From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 09:12:30 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 13:12:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlBOA-0000CT-1E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:12:30 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlBO8-0000CM-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:12:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlBO8-0003Fb-CC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:12:28 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:54510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlBO6-0003i6-Kx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:12:28 -0400 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C9726665 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:12:24 -0400 (EDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.9; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: Update crawl to 0.25.0 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:12:23 -0400 Message-ID: <87sgevcfyg.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Patch attached. The new version of Crawl is amazing. Completely reworked spell system and everything! However, apparently the -nodeps.tar.xz release is normally made before the Debian release... since I expressed interest in packaging 0.25.0 asap one of the devs made the tarball themselves, but appare [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [2600:3c02:0:0:f03c:91ff:feae:cb51 listed in] [zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: dustycloud.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Patch attached. The new version of Crawl is amazing. Completely reworked spell system and everything! However, apparently the -nodeps.tar.xz release is normally made before the Debian release... since I expressed interest in packaging 0.25.0 asap one of the devs made the tarball themselves, but appare [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: dustycloud.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [2600:3c02:0:0:f03c:91ff:feae:cb51 listed in] [zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Patch attached. The new version of Crawl is amazing. Completely reworked spell system and everything! However, apparently the -nodeps.tar.xz release is normally made before the Debian release... since I expressed interest in packaging 0.25.0 asap one of the devs made the tarball themselves, but apparently from an OSX machine, and it left all these ._* doodads in it, which broke compilation. I added a couple of lines to get rid of them. I'm not sure if they're going to release another tarball that removes those; I guess if they do, that'll have a different hash. In the meanwhile this does work. I'm not sure if I should push it or not given the above. Maybe we should wait to see if the dev responds to me on IRC about the ._* files. (Apparently after the tournament is done, a 0.25.1 release is likely soon anyway.) - Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-gnu-crawl-Update-to-0.25.0.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From=20288f754bded0d4c306b3b29e1f8d11a90516b48f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:06:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: crawl: Update to 0.25.0. * gnu/packages/games.scm (crawl): Update to 0.25.0. =2D-- gnu/packages/games.scm | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm index 10ac8cb550..e95effa992 100644 =2D-- a/gnu/packages/games.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/games.scm @@ -5264,7 +5264,7 @@ fish. The whole game is accompanied by quiet, comfor= ting music.") (define-public crawl (package (name "crawl") =2D (version "0.24.0") + (version "0.25.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) @@ -5277,8 +5277,18 @@ fish. The whole game is accompanied by quiet, comfo= rting music.") (string-append "http://crawl.develz.org/release/stone_soup-" version "-nodeps.tar.xz"))) (sha256 =2D (base32 "0kdq6s12myxfdg75ma9x3ys2nd0xwb3xm2ynlmhg4628va0pnixr")) =2D (patches (search-patches "crawl-upgrade-saves.patch")))) + (base32 "0rn1wjxdqw33caiwisfypm1j8cid3c9pz01ahicl17144zs29z3d")) + (patches (search-patches "crawl-upgrade-saves.patch")) + ;; The 0.25.0 -nodeps.tar.xz was built from an OSX machine; normally + ;; apparently it's built from a Debian machine before the Debian + ;; packages are made. These ._* files are binary and have the stri= ng + ;; "Mac OS X" in them... removing these seems to result in compilat= ion + ;; again. + (modules '((guix build utils))) + (snippet + '(begin + (for-each delete-file (find-files "." "^\\._")) + #t)))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (inputs `(("lua51" ,lua-5.1) =2D-=20 2.26.2 --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEUQqGKOKndniPjHCcS8Alkl/49NMFAl7oxTcACgkQS8Alkl/4 9NNfOw//Xmy4itls+zzYJK/dK54Exl0oEV4fyoGmrFH7WYeattakRlFWRdrKSehC ZHp+e4J/Da4n7p4Z26XP72Fwzt9z8vWDSpbLtDwjAvWLz6bq6913IgD9Qc3M2pb3 YT77zmSTAEQa7wLpTLUMUyDVKmkjVTLzRyG9HM0TItwRA2nQ0MvtLW92VRxb9wmH lV6bhN4V0CuTEAxx1dgr/wRodsQ+zc6Jlal/auHMEyJymEOdWAp/azI1ShlsLXkW C+TMsBFShR6z+bxTNSsr7V/d2bG8jVpVESQKPt1jXFSpCWGgNr6VKbENZ7bKi5IQ 0eicoIZNxPOh3Egmxf2c2mgj3mA0Vo7TByYEiEtqWeIFnn3mamB/O8HGuEfjyUwD XrMQV3xBWhnBnRbay5APUshJ5FOxzrgponQfpfQ3kxn+8CjLAHtHZ5L/PlQvMgPE G43WWHETstLQZ3+1RcMZgLLcGiLPmoj3KjKHCtFYZRQalWDRe0+eylpE/3wFxVx1 hT74jQMT+TIbmdpFh0eawzTADXgvrpf+vWaQIZwpFNVIgK1aYMmMppt1R/Z758lk weG5+dQ7dDWeGtDCFw6gJSZUKTBfKMa6Q8ZGBpAwu0fFq5ZoqdrznACs898AKPJk X+tSUko/PS2fuLLrivERskk+LW7/nvPopApsnF+iM6XdashECDs= =JPAZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 11:31:51 2020 Received: (at 41892) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 15:31:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49423 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlDZ1-0003ot-8M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:31:51 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlDYy-0003oe-GP for 41892@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:31:49 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592321506; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=P3Og14VTgDcCmMBcODRQ2N7uYjB58hfaRGECUtNjON/cxVVMLJCsR9vuBxfzIuXWFvGOX6KiJCJ7DSLtidGMLvLmRyBL4KpmAoHlkljiL20Kp5CmXQ/drdN1rxjFh6hw97Q5sySx8J3S/5+GpRqzUGPw39spxoRqbRWGe/F0g4g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1592321506; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=gpOQdpQ3OzcO9XCc4kOHFnzd6XaXZELxBubfbV9IqDY=; b=VGFOM8Lg/lp3LT5/xkY5anFW27JKAgtGnriVyJimpvgjpOfLF8KuHEFZCHm+gP9mio3rmHfBIcnEJSFUOMsfA9VaO3sNxYItVaDjPspZFK5+w1K4i2Ta3ry4utMep9pdZurxMAUuXaZVWMyd0LkPOSMZbo/rWz27+d04b+qdN2g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1592321506; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=gpOQdpQ3OzcO9XCc4kOHFnzd6XaXZELxBubfbV9IqDY=; b=YuqdSQ+n4VfyHxffTLbc29f1t7nq6U/TUGK9jSieM79qo/Q6r2AsJZRNT6pcvFTG mEUt6u9M8/EQpCF6SiXA6/bqnvW20g5PRShD6XAr+S+S183AYmXAwMjUzJBq+z45GiI +K6VZ5wo82vY53kz6ZMYoPulmEyvoraJ6XcNheoo= Received: from localhost (p54ad4b58.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.75.88]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 15923215028661014.8469009709956; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:31:42 -0700 (PDT) References: <87sgevcfyg.fsf@dustycloud.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Subject: Re: [bug#41892] Update crawl to 0.25.0 In-reply-to: <87sgevcfyg.fsf@dustycloud.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:31:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87d05zuiw4.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41892 Cc: 41892@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Patch attached. The new version of Crawl is amazing. Completely > reworked spell system and everything! This looks good to me. > I'm not sure if I should push it or not given the above. Maybe we > should wait to see if the dev responds to me on IRC about the ._* files. I think it=E2=80=99s fine. That=E2=80=99s one of the use cases for snippet= s. --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 15:07:53 2020 Received: (at 41892-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 19:07:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGw5-0000kU-2H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:53 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:39018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGw4-0000kM-5k for 41892-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:52 -0400 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9397326618; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:51 -0400 (EDT) References: <87sgevcfyg.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87d05zuiw4.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.9; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [bug#41892] Update crawl to 0.25.0 In-reply-to: <87d05zuiw4.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87o8pide2g.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41892-done Cc: 41892-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Patch attached. The new version of Crawl is amazing. Completely >> reworked spell system and everything! > > This looks good to me. > >> I'm not sure if I should push it or not given the above. Maybe we >> should wait to see if the dev responds to me on IRC about the ._* files. > > I think it=E2=80=99s fine. That=E2=80=99s one of the use cases for snipp= ets. Ok! It's pushed then. (If someone notices that the hash becomes mismatched, it's probably because the source did a re-upload removing those files... I don't know if they will; haven't heard as such.) From unknown Fri Sep 05 16:58:34 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator