GNU bug report logs - #41766
Make it possible to change regexp to identify and highlight grep matches via customization

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Simon Lang <simon.lang <at> outlook.com>

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:32:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 41766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: Simon Lang <Simon.lang <at> outlook.com>
Cc: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>,
 "41766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <41766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: bug#41766: Make it possible to change regexp to identify and
 highlight grep matches via customization
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:55:25 +0100
Simon Lang <Simon.lang <at> outlook.com> writes:

> From bc9b736ff20a03e831bc5110283ccf9241127773 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Simon Lang <simon.lang <at> outlook.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 20:47:08 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Make regexp used to highlight grep matches customizable
>
> * lisp/progmodes/grep.el
> ---
>  lisp/progmodes/grep.el | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/grep.el b/lisp/progmodes/grep.el
> index 7731be5965..3f0c99f6dc 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/grep.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/grep.el
> @@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ To change the default value, use \\[customize] or call the function
>    :set #'grep-apply-setting
>    :version "22.1")
>  
> +(defcustom grep-match-regexp "\033\\[0?1;31m\\(.*?\\)\033\\[[0-9]*m"
> +  "Regex definition to identify grep markers to highlight matches.")

Nit: How about "Regular expression matching grep markers to highlight."

Every defcustom also needs:

  :type 'regexp
  :version "28.1"

as well as possibly being announced in etc/NEWS.

I wonder, though: the default value matches some quite obscure codes
which aren't (and maybe shouldn't be) documented, so is a defcustom
really suitable for this?  Or would a defvar suffice?  (I don't have
strong feelings either way.)

Thanks,

-- 
Basil




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 240 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.