GNU bug report logs - #41742
28.0.50; Derive gnus-edit-form-mode from lisp-data-mode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>

Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 19:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: 41742 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#41742: 28.0.50; Derive gnus-edit-form-mode from lisp-data-mode
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 23:31:46 +0100
Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie> writes:
>
>> While there, would you mind cleaning up how gnus-edit-form-mode-map is
>> defined?  It currently does a defvar+unless+setq dance, whereas it
>> should ideally only be a defvar+let, as per the last few paragraphs of
>> (info "(elisp) Tips for Defining").
>
> Huh, the last few paragraphs of that info page make it look like it's
> _okay_ to do defvar+unless+setq, am I misreading this? Granted it only
> says to do it so you can get the docstring closer to the defvar, and
> there's no docstring in this case, but it does seem acceptable.

I posit it's always better to defvar+let in one swell foop.

> I wonder what the point of writing it this way is, otherwise?

In most places I've seen defvar+unless, it's due to the author thinking
in terms of "if the user hasn't already defined this map before loading
this file, then..."

But defvar provides these semantics for free and in a cleaner way.

Unless I'm missing something, that is.

-- 
Basil




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 340 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.