GNU bug report logs -
#41734
[PATCH] gnu: sudo: Separate Python output.
Previous Next
Reported by: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 09:01:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:56:21 +0200
with message-id <87v9k2aqbu.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#41734] [PATCH] gnu: sudo: Separate Python output.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41734,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: sudo: Separate Python output.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
41734: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41734
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
The Python plugin of "sudo" drag the Python interpreter to the closure of
Guix System. Put it in a separate output.
* gnu/packages/admin.scm (sudo)[arguments]: Add a 'separate-python-output
phase.
---
Hello,
Here's a patch to remove Python from the Guix Sytem closure. As Python
cross-compilation is broken, the "python" output cannot be populated when
cross-compiling. This is not great. An alternative would be not to provide
"python" output when cross-compiling but that requires to turn "output" into a
thunk field, and I been advised not to do that (for performance reasons) in
the past.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Mathieu
gnu/packages/admin.scm | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
index 77981e520a..9d9d70c88d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
@@ -1375,6 +1375,7 @@ system administrator.")
(delete-file-recursively "lib/zlib")
#t))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (outputs (list "out" "python"))
(arguments
`(#:configure-flags
(list (string-append "--docdir=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")
@@ -1432,7 +1433,23 @@ system administrator.")
(substitute* "plugins/sudoers/Makefile.in"
(("^pre-install:" match)
(string-append match "\ndisabled-" match)))
- #t)))
+ #t))
+ (add-after 'install 'separate-python-output
+ (lambda* (#:key target outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
+ (out:python (assoc-ref outputs "python")))
+ ;; Python cross-compilation is not working.
+ (if target
+ (mkdir-p (string-append out:python "/empty"))
+ (for-each
+ (lambda (file)
+ (let ((old (string-append out "/" file))
+ (new (string-append out:python "/" file)))
+ (mkdir-p (dirname new))
+ (rename-file old new)))
+ (list "libexec/sudo/python_plugin.so"
+ "libexec/sudo/python_plugin.la")))
+ #t))))
;; XXX: The 'testsudoers' test series expects user 'root' to exist, but
;; the chroot's /etc/passwd doesn't have it. Turn off the tests.
--
2.26.2
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hey Tobias,
> I like it! In fact I suggest dropping the cross-compilation comment. IMO
> this doesn't need to be reverted or reconsidered even when that's fixed.
Fixed and pushed, thanks for having a look!
Mathieu
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 350 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.