GNU bug report logs - #41727
26.3; Doc of `define-minor-mode' and minor-mode commands

Previous Next

Full log

Message #79 received at 41727 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: stefan <at> marxist.se, 41727 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: bug#41727: 26.3; Doc of `define-minor-mode' and
 minor-mode commands
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 20:18:10 +0300

> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> CC: "41727-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <41727-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 16:58:33 +0000
> Accept-Language: en-US
> 
> > This bug report is sprawling, and it is very hard to make heads or
> > tails of what is being discussed.
> 
> I don't think that's the case.  Of course it takes
> time to read and understand a bug thread.
> 
> > In any case, Eli seems to be of the opinion that
> > no further change is needed here.
> 
> Eli was the one who said (and I agreed):
> 
>   Do we have other places where a function called
>   from Lisp uses the prefix arg in any similar way?
> 
>   It seems bad practice to me: non-interactive calls
>   shouldn't use interactive features.
> 
> That's about the code behavior, not about the doc
> string.

Exactly.

>         But especially given that unusual (per Eli)
> behavior, I think the doc string should make clear
> what the behavior is (for Lisp use).

No, that doesn't follow.

Stefan is right: this bug should be closed.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.