GNU bug report logs - #41689
[PATCH] Add cl-rdkafka

Previous Next

Full log

Message #16 received at 41689 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 41689 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#41689] Add cl-rdkafka
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 11:17:40 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> That is a mistake; there's no reason it can't be listed as a regular input.
>
> During my tests to confirm this, I realized that sbcl-cl-rdkafka
> wasn't actually producing any useful output. This led me down a
> rabbit-hole (albeit a productive one). Below is a new patch set.
>
> 11:23 kate says: guix refresh -l sbcl-lparallel
> Building the following 4 packages would ensure 8 dependent packages
> are rebuilt: ecl-cl-rdkafka <at> 1.0.2 cl-rdkafka <at> 1.0.2
> cl-random-forest <at> 0.1-0.85fbdd4 next <at> 1.5.0
>
> All dependent packages continue to build.
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:01 AM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>> > (propagated-inputs
>> >  `(("librdkafka" ,librdkafka)))
>>
>> Why is the librdkafka library a propagated input instead of a regular
>> input?

Thanks. Patches pushed as 388a89750ec60a320dd7b6a0b0f174cbed4f50c6 and
64174aff927f4f9da18ea452247c838e6bab3306. Except I didn't push the
definition for ecl-cl-rdkafka because it didn't build (because of the
phase moving a file before the cleanup phase IIRC).

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.