GNU bug report logs - #41689
[PATCH] Add cl-rdkafka

Previous Next

Full log

Message #13 received at 41689 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 41689 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#41689] Add cl-rdkafka
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:24:26 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

That is a mistake; there's no reason it can't be listed as a regular input.

During my tests to confirm this, I realized that sbcl-cl-rdkafka
wasn't actually producing any useful output. This led me down a
rabbit-hole (albeit a productive one). Below is a new patch set.

11:23 kate says: guix refresh -l sbcl-lparallel
Building the following 4 packages would ensure 8 dependent packages
are rebuilt: ecl-cl-rdkafka <at> 1.0.2 cl-rdkafka <at> 1.0.2
cl-random-forest <at> 0.1-0.85fbdd4 next <at> 1.5.0

All dependent packages continue to build.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:01 AM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > (propagated-inputs
> >  `(("librdkafka" ,librdkafka)))
>
> Why is the librdkafka library a propagated input instead of a regular
> input?

[0002-gnu-Add-cl-rdkafka.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0001-gnu-lparallel-Modify-system-definition-to-require-sb.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.