Subject: Re: bug#41659: 28.0.50; smime: encryption uses now base64, message not readable

From: Uwe Brauer <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:31:59 +0200

>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:

> Uwe Brauer <[email-masked]> writes:
>> In principle, but I also think users don't use smime that much, because
>> the setup is as you said, cumbersome. I just thought documentation could
>> help in the meantime (recall that I reported the smime bug, err August
>> last year).

> I've been, like, away.  :-/

I am glad  you are back. ;-)

> Better documentation is also welcome, of course.

I'll think about it. Your solution is of course much better.