GNU bug report logs - #41572
28.0.50; [PATCH] Support plain project marked with file .emacs-project

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Zhu Zihao <cjpeople2013 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 04:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 54228

Found in versions 28.0.50, 29.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>, Rudi Schlatte <rudi <at> constantly.at>, Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>, Zhu Zihao <cjpeople2013 <at> gmail.com>, Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>, Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es>, Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>, Manuel Uberti <manuel.uberti <at> inventati.org>, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>, Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com>, 41572 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#41572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Support plain project marked with file .emacs-project
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 19:23:29 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022, 12:30 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> wrote:

>
> > My use case is the following: I'm interested in being able to designate
> > projects (through various means, not only marker files) that may only
> > exist inside other projects.
>
> You previously described your super-project and how you handled it using
> project-find-functions hook with a new element that looked for file
> markers. Does this patch make that easier to do? Without writing custom
> functions?
>

The example i gave did _not_ use file markers. Personally, I can't use
them. I need some elisp way.

> I then want the C-x p family of commands
> > to allow a choice of inner project or any of the associated
> > super-projects.
>
> Please avoid mixing feature requests. I already said that "choice of
> inner or outer" is out of scope for this, but it's easily implemented on
> top.
>

What good are sub and super projects without a way to take advantage of
them? If anything we should focus on the operations first.

I have not seen your other patch. I take it it must have had some drawback
since you superseded it with something else. But post the link, this thread
is too long. I'll look at it on Monday if I have time.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 170 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.