From unknown Fri Sep 12 13:30:23 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#41559 <41559@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#41559 <41559@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: texmathp reports false negatives Reply-To: bug#41559 <41559@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:30:23 +0000 retitle 41559 texmathp reports false negatives reassign 41559 auctex submitter 41559 TEC severity 41559 normal tag 41559 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 27 01:56:00 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2020 05:56:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48048 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdp2m-0001Z0-4B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:56:00 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53236) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdokx-00016s-JQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:37:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdokx-0000vL-Cu for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:37:35 -0400 Received: from se4i-iad1.servconfig.com ([173.231.241.39]:36823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdokw-0001PR-9P for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:37:35 -0400 Received: from biz215.inmotionhosting.com ([192.145.239.51]) by se4-iad1.servconfig.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdokq-000ATh-NW for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:37:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecosaur.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lZt4P6h8ZfgjJg6rm1jqxHVZfTqqDzsiyiiq1tS+Apg=; b=Zpo9YKf6tZ9Sztf8zy37OPZ2/S 6EFDJKWvQfPbsWHokJE3p/HJ7KzeGL8Oh6UfVqoMLu20h8i8fWoa/Q4lQKYHv1EIPFBsyw76j36xm K9AvHXI7B8JtXmdHxJutApMAkfpV+KC8n4L5P4SY4gjpVTjLpMbs2U5uDtxsYu/Ivi4Y2CW2iaq3C NOgLfpeOChGXzj94VzZT8wXPqyIIa+V4mg9KtEeHzkQL3Du1jDIIUtdfkLtK42c/lj8pYGwXbiKZX FGehRY2an5QNCkQoSj/Yes3ed2UhHdFKt1DzZaYQHQQ2vVNW8tUdxO4UF47aT0srwZX0faNqXaHEP i0pJpVBw==; Received: from [180.150.91.8] (port=40886 helo=localhost) by biz215.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jdokp-005UN0-FN for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:37:27 -0700 From: TEC To: bug-auctex@gnu.org Subject: texmathp reports false negatives Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:25:09 +0800 User-agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 26.3 Message-ID: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: tec@tecosaur.com X-Authenticated-Sender: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: tec@tecosaur.com X-Originating-IP: 192.145.239.51 X-SpamExperts-Domain: biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 192.145.239.51 Authentication-Results: servconfig.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=192.145.239.51@biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.36) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0cz3TYWAMatow42l8TcmTKWpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVLnNwvOjTRy4S ZeNWK1scFETNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGD+yo/ytuqFqItjPf6AZtAbzbl kDZNUkuHiojIVh7uAUvUJPyb56S28HmCJDTdSydBUZq99/v+OWrp+SY7iSueayR33y9VBJINjNKN q11CCuncEDhSTycWRZ+mEhPZ4AIOT0faNNeCAjrPaSFl/DrSybA8bq8UYipQyYsgzpAU8UXlIzDf 7jz79rZG84BpHgSuotxkr8Iq9DrIchJDsHwmLyUS6gl8GdZSzkt8NwSA4/77XboatnmCadTOrkIb f975kHhEyM2tiEp+XRIAUc3UzkQMF99VlWOZVo1sbhkkbsVl3+TTaFqscM0+2EG9m6t7g8oiq9mz mwrbQbTulSg7juWBOXp8nHKe0R+FkIqN7hnDD6pB70LlwpsXkY1htC/fMczzN5mQ043Do45hhrwg 0REuqNMl4E+tMKMsv/A3u4xFRxF9LSHNsZFl22lrRRn/H0knlMgOQTVp+x1fo2EPm7RRpkhz2DzV 8AC0M8MF4CCztzIDXsKvmPUtoXMNy+jrxGfp652emegUWxtpCTRaFPDzui326MukPJwgPmzhOi5s sMw9Fq5CUpjLyUD1mywzG65wl0jmfFGcJZU3CwmuPNALcfLsSdDQjx3YJQ9wjpnsoVg7xVfMtGNe 4LVr7/vFVgUVN12b1Ctfih74/Kdn2mre/hsBBxzR0ZxLcHZ9dOgQ7Fn20zmBNycIlvr2qfbeVvfF U34G5+dE1PEEKjPmfSyz5KmljwlYmPhuTAT9ilCV88/WkcyYY9+GasP8dLXS9R/2gMGq0KWAzmMf +ibVDhZl9g7b+PS/AsaHkIRNMLBEZbqkkVp1lrtlJiKu7nIq3jR5NeVaJQBh0uawl0Cg8lnvL9NP 4QSi4tyWn1Lff+bUejAzwJSciIG7w+9d9Jc1Isqoj+dFIMdfCwvmduy37kQIIz8ra8p3EqmJM7Pt ItQwCqNwL+4nALumVid/eH4R X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1-lax1.servconfig.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=173.231.241.39; envelope-from=tec@tecosaur.com; helo=se4i-iad1.servconfig.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/27 01:37:31 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 May 2020 01:55:58 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello! Org-mode recently added support for editing LaTeX fragments in the=20 minibuffer (https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/f5c47d8).=20 While I have previously noticed occasions where (texmathp) has=20 failed to pick up math mode from LaTeX inline deliminators (by=20 which I mean \(\) and \[\]), with this it's become increacingly=20 apparent to me. Perhaps there are issues caused by not having a=20 full LaTeX file with \begin{document} etc., but this doesn't seem=20 to be an issue with 'old' TeX deliminators ($=E2=80=A6$ and $$=E2=80=A6$$). Consider the following examples #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \(a\) #+END_EXPORT and #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \[ a \] #+END_EXPORT In both cases (texmathp) returns nil. However if I replace these=20 LaTeX deliminators with their TeX counterparts, (texmathp) rteurns=20 t, correctly. When using say CDLaTeX it automatically inserts deliminators if=20 (texmathp) returns nil, this is obviously problematic, as it=20 causes 'nesting' of deliminators, I.e. \(\(\alpha\)\). Interestingly, once a level of nesting has been performed,=20 (texmathp) returns t. I hope that someone may be willing to tweak texmathp and have it=20 produce correct results in these cases. Regards, Timothy. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 27 23:02:51 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 03:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je8ok-0005kP-Q8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 23:02:50 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:37074) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je8oi-0005kE-O6 for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 23:02:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-146-134-146.rev.home.ne.jp [42.146.134.146]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 129E26C; Thu, 28 May 2020 12:02:45 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: TEC Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives In-reply-to: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> Comments: In-reply-to TEC message dated "Wed, 27 May 2020 13:25:09 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3661.1590634964.1@localhost> Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:02:44 +0900 Message-ID: <3666.1590634964@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, >>>>> TEC writes: > Consider the following examples > #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \(a\) #+END_EXPORT > and > #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \[ > a > \] #+END_EXPORT > In both cases (texmathp) returns nil. However if I replace these LaTeX > deliminators with their TeX counterparts, (texmathp) rteurns t, > correctly. It doesn't reproduce on my side. I saved a file with the contents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \(a\) #+END_EXPORT #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \[ a \] #+END_EXPORT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- and evaluated (texmathp) by M-: at each position before "a". Both returned t for me. Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 00:32:30 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 04:32:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeADW-0007x2-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:32:30 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:37472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeADU-0007wt-KR for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:32:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-146-134-146.rev.home.ne.jp [42.146.134.146]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C53B76; Thu, 28 May 2020 13:32:26 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: TEC Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives In-reply-to: <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> Comments: In-reply-to TEC message dated "Thu, 28 May 2020 11:23:57 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4430.1590640345.1@localhost> Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 13:32:25 +0900 Message-ID: <4432.1590640345@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Timothy, >>>>> TEC writes: > I'm on > - AucTeX 12.2.0 (fafa28d) > - Emacs 26.3 > - Linux 5.6.13 It doesn't seem that there is significant difference. I'm on GNU Emacs 26.3 (build 1, x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0, GTK+ Version 3.24.9) AUCTeX-date "2020-05-17" > Whether I put mu cursor before or after a latex-mode buffer simply > containing > \(a\) I find (texmathp) returns nil. I'd like to ask the precise position of the cursor. Does "before or after" means "just before" and "just after"? In other words, was the blinking rectangle of the cursor just on the first backslash and just after the closing paren, respectively, of "\(a\)"? If so, `texmathp' does return nil, and that's the expected way in which that function operates. Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 00:45:31 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 04:45:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAQ6-0008Ga-Gf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:45:30 -0400 Received: from se6e-iad1.servconfig.com ([173.231.241.27]:60105) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je9EU-0006Mz-BL for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 23:29:26 -0400 Received: from biz215.inmotionhosting.com ([192.145.239.51]) by se6-iad1.servconfig.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1je9ER-000kG6-Ur; Wed, 27 May 2020 23:29:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecosaur.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-reply-to :References:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=inm+uXT+NPsgPyF44NHLcs2mCnVC8ayxL3Eyw02pibc=; b=kLxJ7zVSZaqWCEW8lTHBZfCM2s CPWO5QL77f8WL8l0VeFlldHYKCdeUICcL1CLscaDB65OLSbXyo22x73aP8rP8g52mVx9rNunrsruL KAc7quaNOF3CqOxDUH/0mpkUT/Vsoe8Fv1jynvWnapRN1tP/pi62Hv4Z1dpEdOak/5BKQVSkrsufd mdD7OzFM7LRco6zwVDZiBxnUo//MuPC5d5vzAfkG/7cQoEgVWhHIvDtiS0Slcsf9q2Rf7U7uukGDe pC+3vonZxbfCDmbWqX8n80Gsz4d1yCV04l3cuV47V5vxMGFeFns865LRnk3YS5pEU4sgqz+KKH7WA Frq42ogQ==; Received: from [180.150.91.8] (port=53766 helo=localhost) by biz215.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1je9EP-000amm-Sm; Wed, 27 May 2020 20:29:22 -0700 From: TEC To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:23:57 +0800 References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 26.3 In-reply-to: <3666.1590634964@localhost> Message-ID: <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: tec@tecosaur.com X-Authenticated-Sender: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: tec@tecosaur.com X-Originating-IP: 192.145.239.51 X-SpamExperts-Domain: biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 192.145.239.51 Authentication-Results: servconfig.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=192.145.239.51@biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0cz3TYWAMatow42l8TcmTKWpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVrwZCI8ghU7xk F2JakvDlhETNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKyP9eGNFz9TW9u+Jt8z2T3KlXnhrv46UZeL1tmEcflJbaLR in8OK4QMadE9+8enrMvJBMGtZu2I+lv9cgpQMljm58fMnqZUTt7CyKlJUh+zhnt7FkO0pyxbyK2p 5t1MlQbloW5O8nKi+aEgzCvYcGcNjkN/7a8lmuPytolScg3DiT/kYfnBzz78ssFjMu86LtOA63sm tGZAtYtdS6tUnvKI4d51VN6FLGUm5LeF0L0j7wEbMp8Qx9A/kiwyVnREl84sOdAaBGAeOKhTx+m3 vF4LsArQv+5M23dYLDjUbMZvVmr6m72Gjb0JXKncO30D1zlDSsJwEdqFYrGPm5xKlgioJzcWbR66 Up7M+jJSl7EpEHTaVz/7pRFegyFAy3NGHeok5WBPmXJ/Kdaz6RuuD9cuG5/1GojKNk/vA6TUbp47 u2sI1JuLkyxl+s9t81KNtzMGoIWEg0dLSnZQ5gvjZLDcjS7UkVihpqIaIpf9QIiqPrZIF8ronaI7 xIN6o34ogH/74O4hBSz/kkmPgL+fgIguTDwBv82NOyZNp9oAZxK++7AdqHLw9OEWRoDE3/rmS6eK rK4Tg1UkTbEm+I7/lj6FfcusqDYXQ8uRbtEhHgufcFYRAQREUG29l0GXe/PlystDVPQ6fMev1BMP vQ9qu4cW0z6bhalFEM/pjPCQA+BAlpsh1Wp4SXbl1nXJ+f+R/LSci8JLiiOdckUewCJrmQRc2XKT 4BCSi2w8mgvy3S772BmGXbjL5WrOTUfAWirxLzz6VQfb/c2NIfGrBGJmxhrCkNUVdZjBMMbNiVwd 5JTWYV1IUaJBgMwwL2V84CL/jJ95Pzbd3buIUhYWapsWVtgqUC0SHFRZuvW0nmCoiYeVyCy0QRO7 zCqjOncW6KwJKe5Vvuh0bGZv8yGlXdhBZHd6awjUm4uTLGX6z23zUo23M/Mnjtguv3iN6EaQM39Q pqao0peHwaUU/gUIfR3pRctyrw06R6bxmsiw7FImj0yCexZ+mKsfyDUY5HUgUa3kFaY= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1-lax1.servconfig.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 May 2020 00:45:28 -0400 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ikumi Keita writes: > It doesn't reproduce on my side. I saved a file with the > contents > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \(a\) #+END_EXPORT > > #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex \[ > a > \] #+END_EXPORT > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It may be worth clarifying that in those examples I created two blank buffers with the given text as the only contents. > and evaluated (texmathp) by M-: at each position before "a". > Both returned t for me. Interesting though. Assuming you did the same as me, this directly contradicts with my results. I'm on - AucTeX 12.2.0 (fafa28d) - Emacs 26.3 - Linux 5.6.13 Whether I put mu cursor before or after a latex-mode buffer simply containing \(a\) I find (texmathp) returns nil. > Regards, Ikumi Keita Thanks for testing, hopefully the extra details may help better identify the issue. Timothy. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 00:45:31 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 04:45:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAQ7-0008Gc-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:45:31 -0400 Received: from se4-iad1.servconfig.com ([144.208.77.49]:39567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAI7-00083p-Df for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:37:16 -0400 Received: from biz215.inmotionhosting.com ([192.145.239.51]) by se4-iad1.servconfig.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAI4-000WRD-L4; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:37:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecosaur.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-reply-to :References:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=leQ/FrKk/77Cp5eRI0TRaP2xQQff8gvnQCP4Xj0klUI=; b=AV7YjpvNUVL3VSuPO/+SRjpHou YXJ6olGGDoQHQh++B8RM79YXZJ16PbTCx/bWL0OPyP5pM/dqmH4tBHE3hk0KPq8AWt6arIlXR2BK6 AtremqHL302203obLmIRsdGrcr1E+qdl5rVXz/w3Fzxvi7ercWEEyUW8bseNJyZq9aPETi5sd19LD ENLs6RMb2/0aaxVQYnbNSHfxgw1veLWn5fMk99Hq9e64W0tTrsrtWfrmhDFCEMRy+Z7Du4fr84MG+ zXLTjZSKaYYdOunPNutNXD2kRPjMwEQJi5xCZQgSXGO+GbLEyWXDLa7a4joYun+oM+e2hwzOJEKGC gHD43zog==; Received: from 180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net ([180.150.91.8]:55262 helo=localhost) by biz215.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAI2-002mcZ-0h; Wed, 27 May 2020 21:37:10 -0700 From: TEC To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:33:29 +0800 References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4432.1590640345@localhost> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 26.3 In-reply-to: <4432.1590640345@localhost> Message-ID: <871rn4pte4.fsf@tecosaur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: tec@tecosaur.com X-Authenticated-Sender: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: tec@tecosaur.com X-Originating-IP: 192.145.239.51 X-SpamExperts-Domain: biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 192.145.239.51 Authentication-Results: servconfig.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=192.145.239.51@biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.14) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0cz3TYWAMatow42l8TcmTKWpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVowlB1ZNQUgTZ cZaP2QWjKETNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKyP9eGNFz9TW9u+Jt8z2T3KlXnhrv46UZeL1tmEcflJbaLR in8OK4QMadE9+8enrMvJBMGtZu2I+lv9cgpQMljm58fMnqZUTt7CyKlJUh+zhvRqWVe/ay1q7NlD 1g/IAl/loW5O8nKi+aEgzCvYcGcNjkN/7a8lmuPytolScg3DiT/kYfnBzz78ssFjMu86LtPZM8G5 XTJm0EYakgRnLFfr4d51VN6FLGUm5LeF0L0j7wEbMp8Qx9A/kiwyVnREl84sOdAaBGAeOKhTx+m3 vF4LsArQv+5M23dYLDjUbMZvVmr6m72Gjb0JXKncO30D1zlDSsJwEdqFYrGPm5xKlgioJzcWbR66 Up7M+jJSl7EpEHTaVz/7pRFegyFAy3NGHeok5WBPmXJ/Kdaz6RuuD9cuG5/1GojKNk/vA6TUbp47 u2sI1JuLkyxl+s9t81KNtzMGoIWEg0dLSnZQ5gvjZLDcjS7UkVihpqIaIpf9QIiqPrZIF8ronaI7 xIN6o34ogH/74O4hBSz/kkmPgL+fgIguBvOIYSElYwSL5WttEdffamdZpNu9fgvpvCMm+Y7yx59V HKlCQEEBY/rvWfY+D8CWf2cyt7dgRuS4AuZbyA31FX1rnl3M5XeqfKStVYey+fPTulJRptMnEIdG JW7dfhGq92PNDpgLsd6Ddd/s7VM53vl3LWfuTZXkO5H5lMge2NG0rIpjO6/1LqHA1UlOUbsqvPC9 Q9YFOhT3/7kRjewWA3Ng+1trZEtIMC+R6YtEOHAccBIk1Sag4dKiqCrF8eZZheQIXyB/SyM+Pb7A vSD5CYOLNWGDBWGlo1aXWhgaUP2oOf2l5jEZvKyCwdHfNdDS2fh+2kLo7+w9dI1786EWpW/MQ5DD mkOVvq06QiHHNEBcHCH3vaknTC6iqrrlK11qDzn23lmbQ455+TwtsPDDuUKmuZArOtTNo6IvivK0 zpEMtHRZ4dNoAEFrRIcozef47duugWgmqZHBDDH3Mm//gxRcGvAMkGKozu6mLYl2/vU= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1-lax1.servconfig.com X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ikumi Keita writes: >> Whether I put mu cursor before or after a latex-mode buffer >> simply containing \(a\) I find (texmathp) returns nil. > > I'd like to ask the precise position of the cursor. Does "before > or after [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [144.208.77.49 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: que.jp] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [144.208.77.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 May 2020 00:45:28 -0400 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Ikumi Keita writes: >> Whether I put mu cursor before or after a latex-mode buffer >> simply containing \(a\) I find (texmathp) returns nil. > > I'd like to ask the precise position of the cursor. Does "before > or after" means "just before" and "just after"? In other words, > was the blinking rectangle of the cursor just on the first > backslash and just after the closing paren, respectively, of > "\(a\)"? If so, `texmathp' does return nil, and that's the > expected way in which that function operates. Ooops, that's poor wording on my part. Should have been: Whether I put my cursor before or after "a" in a latex-mode buffer simply containing \(a\) I find (texmathp) returns nil. I.e. With "|" representing the cursor, I've tried \(|a\) and \(a|\) Hope that clarifies, Timothy. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 00:55:28 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 04:55:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50649 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAZj-0008VR-QY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:55:28 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:37544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAZh-0008VH-RK for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:55:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-146-134-146.rev.home.ne.jp [42.146.134.146]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7C85077; Thu, 28 May 2020 13:55:23 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: TEC Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives In-reply-to: <871rn4pte4.fsf@tecosaur.com> References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4432.1590640345@localhost> <871rn4pte4.fsf@tecosaur.com> Comments: In-reply-to TEC message dated "Thu, 28 May 2020 12:33:29 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4697.1590641723.1@localhost> Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 13:55:23 +0900 Message-ID: <4698.1590641723@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> TEC writes: > Ooops, that's poor wording on my part. Should have been: > Whether I put my cursor before or after "a" in a latex-mode buffer > simply containing \(a\) I find (texmathp) returns nil. > I.e. With "|" representing the cursor, I've tried \(|a\) and \(a|\) > Hope that clarifies, Thanks, it does reproduce. It seems that `texmathp' returns nil if "\(a\)" is at the beginning of the buffer. I'll see if I can fix it. Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 00:58:23 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 04:58:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAcW-000089-Bd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:58:23 -0400 Received: from se6-iad1.servconfig.com ([144.208.77.50]:49883) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAcU-000081-JM for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:58:19 -0400 Received: from biz215.inmotionhosting.com ([192.145.239.51]) by se6-iad1.servconfig.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAcQ-000MrJ-Vn; Thu, 28 May 2020 00:58:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecosaur.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-reply-to :References:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1ZE7INPjG+3oeJ4EkJcgSQNuVsTLts8Tw2+IpCYgLg8=; b=i6DZc3Nxad8YggRkalHbxVVEFV xh2IDMSaMrotP5J+XC9IyueM2OAeKukoXT0kqU+kFF5zfcZ/aDoL0q/1L2ZLOnODMqpCje7+j63oQ 5AbXBYlPnmmcUqG8ch8tJaIlOUq7mJKItu31UHRtc7sfHO65MZKYmxiNCMHJTEGJJDFNHkGfyqmFR ynUMXfGLlG63tUltwp4qR5dFshkOaeISe6SITUJQIitfygP+DwkOif8LZ86UC1+eclBA0Fq+4V+ZH 1McIpgNjwRlHN97nbAUPewWaJYHrj+dpmkWymncM61ET2ulfFll0m2j42NvNbaItmrBxBKtCfDb0Z pIvgNvXA==; Received: from [180.150.91.8] (port=55636 helo=localhost) by biz215.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jeAcP-003Pfi-8k; Wed, 27 May 2020 21:58:13 -0700 From: TEC To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:56:15 +0800 References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4432.1590640345@localhost> <871rn4pte4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4698.1590641723@localhost> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 26.3 In-reply-to: <4698.1590641723@localhost> Message-ID: <87zh9sodul.fsf@tecosaur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: tec@tecosaur.com X-Authenticated-Sender: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: tec@tecosaur.com X-Originating-IP: 192.145.239.51 X-SpamExperts-Domain: biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 192.145.239.51 Authentication-Results: servconfig.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=192.145.239.51@biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.23) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0cz3TYWAMatow42l8TcmTKWpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVloLWW2/x1YEN ytjTEPJFQETNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKyP9eGNFz9TW9u+Jt8z2T3KlXnhrv46UZeL1tmEcflJbaLR in8OK4QMadE9+8enrMvJBMGtZu2I+lv9cgpQMljm58fMnqZUTt7CyKlJUh+zhg4LUtxtpC2CDTkl UA7o8gnloW5O8nKi+aEgzCvYcGcNjkN/7a8lmuPytolScg3DiT/kYfnBzz78ssFjMu86LtOA63sm tGZAtYtdS6tUnvKI4d51VN6FLGUm5LeF0L0j7wEbMp8Qx9A/kiwyVnREl84sOdAaBGAeOKhTx+m3 vF4LsArQv+5M23dYLDjUbMZvVmr6m72Gjb0JXKncO30D1zlDSsJwEdqFYrGPm5xKlgioJzcWbR66 Up7M+jJSl7EpEHTaVz/7pRFegyFAy3NGHeok5WBPmXJ/Kdaz6RuuD9cuG5/1GojKNk/vA6TUbp47 u2sI1JuLkyxl+s9t81KNtzMGoIWEg0dLSnZQ5gvjZLDcjS7UkVihpqIaIpf9QIiqPrZIF8ronaI7 xIN6o34ogH/74O4hBSz/kkmPgL+fgIguTDwBv82NOyZNp9oAZxK++7AdqHLw9OEWRoDE3/rmS6eE EfawA9k/YyL9FPRJjKP9fcusqDYXQ8uRbtEhHgufcFYRAQREUG29l0GXe/PlystDVPQ6fMev1BMP vQ9qu4cW0z6bhalFEM/pjPCQA+BAlpsh1Wp4SXbl1nXJ+f+R/LSci8JLiiOdckUewCJrmQRc2XKT 4BCSi2w8mgvy3S772NPUopguIlEm5AgdO5SFeUv6VQfb/c2NIfGrBGJmxhrCkNUVdZjBMMbNiVwd 5JTWYV1IUaJBgMwwL2V84CL/jJ95Pzbd3buIUhYWapsWVtgqUC0SHFRZuvW0nmCoiYeVyCy0QRO7 zCqjOncW6KwJKe5Vvuh0bGZv8yGlXdhBZHd6awjUm4uTLGX6z23zUo23M/Mnjtguv3iN6EaQM39Q pqao0peHwaUU/gUIfR3pRctyrw06R6bxmsiw7FImj0yCexZ+mKsfyDUY5HUgUa3kFaY= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1-lax1.servconfig.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ikumi Keita writes: > Thanks, it does reproduce. It seems that `texmathp' returns nil > if "\(a\)" is at the beginning of the buffer. I'll see if I can > fix it. That's great to hear. Thank you very much for taking a look at this. With the new org-edit-special for inline LaTeX fragments, having this work smoothly would be marvelous :) If you'd also be willing to check out the \[ a \] case as well, that would be similarly appriciated. Thanks, Timothy. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 02:28:56 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 06:28:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeC2B-0002Vl-MO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:28:55 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:38112) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeC2A-0002Vb-G1 for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:28:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-146-134-146.rev.home.ne.jp [42.146.134.146]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D594874; Thu, 28 May 2020 15:28:50 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: TEC Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives In-reply-to: <87zh9sodul.fsf@tecosaur.com> References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4432.1590640345@localhost> <871rn4pte4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4698.1590641723@localhost> <87zh9sodul.fsf@tecosaur.com> Comments: In-reply-to TEC message dated "Thu, 28 May 2020 12:56:15 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7480.1590647330.1@localhost> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 15:28:50 +0900 Message-ID: <7481.1590647330@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Timothy, >>>>> TEC writes: > That's great to hear. Thank you very much for taking a look at this. > With the new org-edit-special for inline LaTeX fragments, having this > work smoothly would be marvelous :) > If you'd also be willing to check out the > \[ > a > \] > case as well, that would be similarly appriciated. I installed a fix in the git repo. You can try it out with the following patch. Regards, Ikumi Keita diff --git a/texmathp.el b/texmathp.el index ba5aba39..723623bc 100644 --- a/texmathp.el +++ b/texmathp.el @@ -185,13 +185,11 @@ customize (customize calls it when setting the varia= ble)." ((memq type '(sw-toggle)) 'togglers))) (set var (cons (car entry) (symbol-value var)))) (setq texmathp-onoff-regexp - (concat "[^\\\\]\\(" - (mapconcat 'regexp-quote switches "\\|") - "\\)") + (concat "\\(?:[^\\\\]\\|\\`\\)" + (regexp-opt switches t)) texmathp-toggle-regexp - (concat "\\([^\\\\\\$]\\|\\`\\)\\(" - (mapconcat 'regexp-quote togglers "\\|") - "\\)")))) + (concat "\\([^\\\\\\$]\\|\\`\\)" + (regexp-opt togglers t))))) = (defcustom texmathp-tex-commands nil "List of environments and macros influencing (La)TeX math mode. @@ -287,14 +285,17 @@ See the variable `texmathp-tex-commands' about which= commands are checked." = ;; Select the nearer match (and env-match (setq match env-match)) - (and mac-match (> (cdr mac-match) (cdr match)) (setq match mac-match)= ) + ;; Use `>=3D' instead of `>' in case called inside \ensuremath{..} + ;; beginning just at (point-min). + (and mac-match (>=3D (cdr mac-match) (cdr match)) (setq match mac-mat= ch)) (setq math-on (memq (nth 1 (assoc (car match) texmathp-tex-commands1)= ) '(env-on arg-on))) = ;; Check for switches (and (not math-on) (setq sw-match (texmathp-match-switch bound)) - (> (cdr sw-match) (cdr match)) + ;; Use `>=3D' instead of `>' by similar reason as above. (bug#41559) + (>=3D (cdr sw-match) (cdr match)) (eq (nth 1 (assoc (car sw-match) texmathp-tex-commands1)) 'sw-on) (setq match sw-match math-on t)) = From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 28 02:44:06 2020 Received: (at 41559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2020 06:44:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeCGj-0002uW-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:44:06 -0400 Received: from se2f-iad1.servconfig.com ([173.231.248.12]:52769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jeCGi-0002uJ-GJ for 41559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:43:57 -0400 Received: from biz215.inmotionhosting.com ([192.145.239.51]) by se2-iad1.servconfig.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jeCGf-0000lw-1I; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:43:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tecosaur.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-reply-to :References:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dDCMgTah4CubrKMRIWd4/gvBrHWSBelRWHUikdQKvtM=; b=pPx3zZBEIvncZVqlA+SzL3V7Ao UXvSBVapWM72FgWG9V0ye+9Ot+QhXlGIuZsK7p9M1po9ue6FfTXwLwKUpoFTWZkeuW8Ae1pkMXlp3 fdxA5OLmt0WboAS64Mt9hTyUwjUDai5vEvt7JuQ3UWeVPRZkpVF+8cEuZdUl+VOd4ALNqsz5MRwfp spS5nSNcgNzsxE3CttIZBPi/WxB34aCYNQWJsOkCcWOLCHFmFdAuNWMwlufGLTLV7ZdICc/tBtWvl M7LNqBFdFRUJJSyHg6jfcXr6PkEj20xfdF1oZuqw1AEKKi/Vj2dukkpP5APtDmj3om/Vtry86+Xpa VK7b+Heg==; Received: from 180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net ([180.150.91.8]:58272 helo=localhost) by biz215.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jeCGd-006wCK-Ki; Wed, 27 May 2020 23:43:52 -0700 From: TEC To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#41559: texmathp reports false negatives Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 14:43:15 +0800 References: <87h7w2ueej.fsf@tecosaur.com> <3666.1590634964@localhost> <87367kpwj4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4432.1590640345@localhost> <871rn4pte4.fsf@tecosaur.com> <4698.1590641723@localhost> <87zh9sodul.fsf@tecosaur.com> <7481.1590647330@localhost> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 26.3 In-reply-to: <7481.1590647330@localhost> Message-ID: <87y2pco8yj.fsf@tecosaur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: tec@tecosaur.com X-Authenticated-Sender: biz215.inmotionhosting.com: tec@tecosaur.com X-Originating-IP: 192.145.239.51 X-SpamExperts-Domain: biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 192.145.239.51 Authentication-Results: servconfig.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=192.145.239.51@biz215.inmotionhosting.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.18) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0cz3TYWAMatow42l8TcmTKWpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhV9eZCvrmfXNte ym4E/zZjnkTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKyP9eGNFz9TW9u+Jt8z2T3KlXnhrv46UZeL1tmEcflJbaLR in8OK4QMadE9+8enrMvJBMGtZu2I+lv9cgpQMljm58fMnqZUTt7CyKlJUh+zht9uOCFp1yW8TP0Q Y7MDJ/3loW5O8nKi+aEgzCvYcGcNjkN/7a8lmuPytolScg3DiT/kYfnBzz78ssFjMu86LtMqOS8O J7ycceStJz72PftL4d51VN6FLGUm5LeF0L0j7wEbMp8Qx9A/kiwyVnREl84sOdAaBGAeOKhTx+m3 vF4LsArQv+5M23dYLDjUbMZvVmr6m72Gjb0JXKncO30D1zlDSsJwEdqFYrGPm5xKlgioJzcWbR66 Up7M+jJSl7EpEHTaVz/7pRFegyFAy3NGHeok5WBPmXJ/Kdaz6RuuD9cuG5/1GojKNk/vA6TUbp47 u2sI1JuLkyxl+s9t81KNtzMGoIWEg0dLSnZQ5gvjZLDcjS7UkVihpqIaIpf9QIiqPrZIF8ronaI7 xIN6o34ogH/74O4hBSz/kkmPgL+fgIguBvOIYSElYwSL5WttEdffavBuKzd95iidw0xEDXqCCIU1 hA2S6uJFs/7HzyhvHqUNf2cyt7dgRuS4AuZbyA31FX1rnl3M5XeqfKStVYey+fPTulJRptMnEIdG JW7dfhGq92PNDpgLsd6Ddd/s7VM53vl3LWfuTZXkO5H5lMge2NG0rIpjO6/1LqHA1UlOUbsqvPC9 Q9YFOhT3/7kRjewWA1FAnOsXl2dgN/C9W0ruD+kccBIk1Sag4dKiqCrF8eZZheQIXyB/SyM+Pb7A vSD5CYOLNWGDBWGlo1aXWhgaUP2oOf2l5jEZvKyCwdHfNdDS2fh+2kLo7+w9dI1786EWpW/MQ5DD mkOVvq06QiHHNEBcHCH3vaknTC6iqrrlK11qDzn23lmbQ455+TwtsPDDuUKmuZArOtTNo6IvivK0 zpEMtHRZ4dNoAEFrRIcozef47duugWgmqZHBDDH3Mm//gxRcGvAMkGKozu6mLYl2/vU= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1-lax1.servconfig.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41559 Cc: 41559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ikumi Keita writes: > I installed a fix in the git repo. You can try it out with the > following patch. Thank you very much for doing this. I'll take a look :) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 06 05:28:44 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2020 09:28:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50743 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhV88-00081d-EC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 05:28:44 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:36666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhV87-00081U-E8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 05:28:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-146-134-146.rev.home.ne.jp [42.146.134.146]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A96C12E for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:28:42 +0900 (JST) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Ikumi Keita Subject: control message for bug #41559 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <42753.1591435719.1@localhost> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 18:28:39 +0900 Message-ID: <42754.1591435719@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 41559 fixed close 41559 quit From unknown Fri Sep 12 13:30:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator