GNU bug report logs - #41490
[PATCH 0/5] Add pEp (pretty Easy privacy)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel <at> gnu.org>, 41490 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#41490] Advice on package naming
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:13:00 +0200

Hi Hartmut,

Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com> skribis:

> I'm still seeking advice on how to name these packages, since the
> original packages have
> quiet uncommon names. Shall I keep the names I'm currently using, or are
> there any other suggestions?
>
> Current names:
>
> pep-engine
> libpepadapter.
> python-pep-adapter
> java-pep-adapter

That LGTM, I think it’s pretty much in line with:

  https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Package-Naming.html

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.