GNU bug report logs - #41428
[PATCH 0/5] Wrappers for c compilers

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Ryan Prior <rprior <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 41428 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#41428] [PATCH 0/5] Wrappers for c compilers
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 23:01:57 +0200

Hi,

Ryan Prior <rprior <at> protonmail.com> skribis:

> My use-case, my vision, is that I want to provide end-users an environment manifest such that `guix environment -m build-env.scm` sets everything up so that `make && make check` succeed.
>
> I created these wrappers in service of this vision, to save end-users the trouble of creating and managing aliases on a per-environment basis when they already don't have to do that using the working set they're familiar with. I want to position Guix as a total win for tooling simplicity; but a lot of small complexities, each of which is easily worked-around, add up quickly to undermine my message.
>
> I would lose all interest in this patch set if I had a more general purpose way of extending a manifest with more things than just packages. I picture, for example, a manifest with three parts:
>
> - packages
> - env variables
> - aliases
>
> Right now afaict a manifest only has the first of those things. Given I've got this nice packagehammer, I'm inclined to insist upon the usefulness of this patch set as a means of turning `cc` into a nail.

I understand your goal and I agree that it’s good to avoid building a
pile of small complexities that all add up.

I don’t think lack of ‘cc’ is one them though.  First, because it’s a
developer tool, and developers will know they can type ‘gcc’, ‘clang’,
or whatever, create an alias, etc.  Second, because most build systems
(Autoconf-generated ‘configure’ scripts, CMake) accommodate the lack of
‘cc’, which thus goes unnoticed.

My 2¢!
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.