GNU bug report logs - #41276
[PATCH 0/9] Various small improvements to EasyPG

Previous Next

Full log

Message #89 received at 41276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
Cc: 41276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#41276: Acknowledgement ([PATCH 0/9] Various small
 improvements to EasyPG)
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 09:45:07 +0300

> From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
> Cc: 41276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 00:42:26 +0200
> 
> We are in agreement.  We numbered the rules differently, which resulted
> in some confusion.

Yes, that's what I thought.

> How do you feel about my suggestion to clarify one of the rules like so?
> 
> -- If only a single file is changed, the summary line can be the normal
> -  file first line (starting with the asterisk).  Then there is no
> -  individual files section.
> +- If only a single file is changed, then the first (and in this case
> +  only) file entry can at the same time serve as the summary line,
> +  provided that this entry fits on a single line.  In this case the
> +  summary should begin with an asterisk and end with a period, like
> +  all file entries always do.

It's fine with me, and it's what I do in my commits.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.