GNU bug report logs - #41189
[PATCH 0/3] Add Fakechroot engine for 'guix pack -RR'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#41189: closed ([PATCH 0/3] Add Fakechroot engine for 'guix
 pack -RR')
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 15:25:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 14 May 2020 17:24:04 +0200
with message-id <87wo5etu97.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#41189] [PATCH v2 0/4] Add Fakechroot engine for 'guix pack -RR'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41189,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] Add Fakechroot engine for 'guix pack -RR'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
41189: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41189
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Add Fakechroot engine for 'guix pack -RR'
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 19:05:54 +0200

Hello Guix!

‘guix pack -RR’ is wonderful, as we know ;-), because it produces
binaries that work everywhere.

However, the overhead of PRoot is sometimes inappropriate, in
particular for those who want to run packed software on
high-performance computers, the very kind of machine that lacks
Guix and unprivileged user namespaces.

This patch series adds an optional “execution engine” to wrappers
that uses ld.so and fakechroot LD_PRELOAD trickery.  Since it’s
just LD_PRELOAD, there’s very little overhead, unlike PRoot.
On the flip side, it doesn’t work as well as PRoot, because it’s
“just” LD_PRELOAD.

For example, some of the ‘open’ calls made in libc are not
intercepted; on such call is in ‘__gconv_load_cache’, which makes
it fail, and in turn makes Guile fail to start in its first
‘scm_to_locale_string’ call.  Things that work well include Bash
and Python 3.  Let me know how well it works for your favorite
application!

The execution engine can now be chosen at run time by setting the
‘GUIX_EXECUTION_ENGINE’.

For the record, tools like udocker support a similar range of
execution engines: <https://github.com/indigo-dc/udocker/>.

Feedback welcome!

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (3):
  pack: Wrapper honors 'GUIX_EXECUTION_ENGINE' environment variable.
  gnu: Add fakechroot.
  pack: Add relocation via ld.so and fakechroot.

 doc/guix.texi                             |  43 +++-
 gnu/packages/aux-files/run-in-namespace.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 gnu/packages/linux.scm                    |  30 +++
 guix/scripts/pack.scm                     |  65 +++++-
 tests/guix-pack-relocatable.sh            |  23 ++
 5 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: 41189-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#41189] [PATCH v2 0/4] Add Fakechroot engine for 'guix pack
 -RR'
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:24:04 +0200

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

>   pack: Wrapper honors 'GUIX_EXECUTION_ENGINE' environment variable.
>   pack: Factorize store references in wrapper.
>   gnu: Add fakechroot.
>   pack: Add relocation via ld.so and fakechroot.

Pushed as 6456232164890dbf5aa20394ee24637feb4b7b9e!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.