From lennart.borgman@gmail.com Mon Aug 10 14:49:13 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Aug 2009 21:49:13 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n7ALnCig003595 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:49:13 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:38088 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Macjv-0006m2-4y for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:49:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Macju-0003b4-FD for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:49:10 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]:37573) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Macju-0003ay-5b for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:49:10 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so1272290ana.21 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C86ks8A6HU3Mu4fS+uXvBqF8z6F+JD8iTKcmBjb/X4s=; b=IL1QrjaEXv/VGiPQ5W0OjOopmH0DU4fnH2EQQl+44KgNFm5iXihqKjlMaQsRP3/qSj pbc1i9ijKW/lMwUqsSXuubkYImqK8waYngTV3mYfR8JuWwaWT9ROuPjuDqn6fNccNrig nNQa3nnTY33KV6QuUgCqogtRU3VwrmknLbr+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=kXA/4BfW/wvDCIuj8LjD28wAvP/zpoFZ9YFK6z8e+cHy8NEXd3HS3cdkY31FiIEOOw Aefr2Vq9/KxB78MiaBH7/ciF8muKWc1ipGmbSTobgO5sTWgbVSAZk6fa7l+kPwP7mjYz xrFNYWaNbI2fY+AdKglGG1O9NMcRjxfwCqddk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.127.17 with SMTP id z17mr4331578anc.153.1249940949270; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:49:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: 23.1.50; Checkdoc should recognize "minor mode" From: Lennart Borgman To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) You are not allowed by checkdoc to write "minor mode `my-mode'". Please allow that. In GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-08-01 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include -fno-crossjumping' From cyd@stupidchicken.com Sun Sep 13 13:25:34 2009 Received: (at 4110) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Sep 2009 20:25:35 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8DKPXlI030096 for <4110@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:25:34 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 028DE57E26C; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:26:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Lennart Borgman Cc: 4110@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.1.50; Checkdoc should recognize "minor mode" Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:26:59 -0400 Message-ID: <87fxaqmvzg.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > You are not allowed by checkdoc to write "minor mode `my-mode'". > Please allow that. Please be specific. From lennart.borgman@gmail.com Sun Sep 13 15:21:29 2009 Received: (at 4110) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Sep 2009 22:21:29 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8DMLRIc019671 for <4110@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:21:28 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so1016258ana.31 for <4110@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=FHy8/hLT8FUNQD3Mj7gLO4xXXfTCAeoL2RrQklfCbFY=; b=rGwWZGbejaL/Ygy+mVKpvrZb+XVZAZuytN2AK0sFTpJpOohvtYUvQTG1aQdJR2AYgq E9Nzr3Jw3cbmrM9mAuxbfMp1glIv3Mf8rD2lF7vMcTjmqBAdafvJGd6Ha3vriRVxiw+K cFG40JPn389+/ESADcsRK1vm982rZ1C5y5Cxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=gX3CDmkrjd/XFjypD/MgRm4AKIsZAay4+uoSunRFJoB6x7IXLU5NrbgSL8taCp5ETt 0/FWLJo+0WDPb2BunhjHK/3XaOQlJ0snQx0g4dzumEx/a/wQqG75NxoTgeeboOr8UkQA yakwsPm2hzD0nmD1TknT4lW1jyXttmsfT8YYY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.43.12 with SMTP id v12mr5634667anj.90.1252880487205; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fxaqmvzg.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87fxaqmvzg.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:21:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 23.1.50; Checkdoc should recognize "minor mode" To: Chong Yidong Cc: 4110@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Chong Yidong wrote: >> You are not allowed by checkdoc to write "minor mode `my-mode'". >> Please allow that. > > Please be specific. You can write "function `my-mode'" or "variable `my-mode'" in a doc string to make checkdoc happy. However I would like to write "minor mode `my-mode'" instead since it is more clear. And I think the `my-mode' link should go to the function since that is wher the doc string from define-minor-mode shows up. From lekktu@gmail.com Thu Oct 22 02:35:31 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 22 Oct 2009 09:35:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,MISSING_SUBJECT, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,NOSUBJECT,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n9M9ZTNW004084 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:35:31 -0700 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so9696363fxm.1 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:35:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=8EmqKmTQZFxRHmBqMf0mAHPBq3MFliknc0lztWoJq6Y=; b=HxQYupT4FFltZz1ItMJj0h3XTFYNK5e7ryT0Cek2T3YESYQLNQM8G9V9i2CKiMAEbc EvYuLj8f7w1qApk14qvzihjcYCGQUOU+1DBevO5UhGKLQhzQ6+vBiuihHNGFYaXeeEYe kJYg0CmwEGM5xp9e/Qz4pt4br7Ml4TcpNJkWo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Y5ybjjcxlLdLgAFAm7oQwPF4q6enZ/vhDgoBesbKLPsYfKZBy2gNxuVUArd1lZsA9C Mqc9bcUQhekOxrkhuBrM/oRLNjZDm8m0DPtCnEMhvvK6rKfs9H9j6QMJR6VObUwlfUeo 7VB35jQ8OYFrwvpcsbgPdQA8bmjmcb1XFRU14= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.145.8 with SMTP id q8mr761204hba.122.1256204124158; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:35:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:35:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 reassign 4326 emacs,ns merge 4261 4434 merge 1589 3359 4207 merge 3829 4077 tags 4781 + patch tags 4747 + patch tags 4579 + patch tags 4471 + patch tags 4434 + patch tags 4234 + patch tags 4221 + patch tags 4147 + patch tags 4144 + patch tags 4139 + patch tags 4023 + patch tags 4736 + moreinfo unreproducible tags 4547 + notabug tags 4451 + notabug tags 4448 + moreinfo tags 4427 + moreinfo tags 4373 + notabug tags 4360 + notabug tags 4271 + moreinfo tags 4236 + moreinfo tags 4143 + moreinfo unreproducible tags 4120 + moreinfo unreproducible tags 4070 + moreinfo unreproducible severity 4422 wishlist severity 4396 minor severity 4394 minor severity 4341 wishlist severity 4300 minor severity 4263 minor severity 4178 minor severity 4172 wishlist severity 4110 wishlist severity 4056 wishlist close 4772 close 4700 close 4599 close 4515 close 4463 close 4445 close 4395 close 4334 close 4289 close 4219 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 08 07:04:31 2021 Received: (at 4110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2021 12:04:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42313 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJEch-0005lf-7X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 07:04:31 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]:36035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJEce-0005lT-VS for 4110@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 07:04:29 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f51.google.com with SMTP id d9so4433945qvo.3 for <4110@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:04:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :user-agent:mime-version; bh=EAu+U3JVXT45zVZd6nerm3t2d4ik7jNoDr0jrJEklhQ=; b=CzPl/+t89XjAdK51DzOAmk1LoCXv/Z3HCXG4FXoNqaLp/cEwcSI7kxrJys452vuhia X5UDAuCVQ1dTuwkz9a5sm2qRvfpyrHExSJ2/MoCGwCW3VSl+3ovjTX+ofI5O5rrJ0D9Z iMHsjpj2kOhXdS4/6Luzv9vpyPiVqHyb26kutDx4Ybbh2q6/O3GjQFEdiEBAGhCUPRG9 jlXAz6NiiQkLr8dogr+FS3IeZl4z+hlX4QHIQ1/u3LOfDWNJBCfzaMU4AMX4Njp0Vqs+ ZmIgPZYwcT4OczCvOFgmGFyGwVCAx6GbbMIjSg6uSWWoDFvEFmB22TZvx4aB2p8odWuv mGOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:user-agent:mime-version; bh=EAu+U3JVXT45zVZd6nerm3t2d4ik7jNoDr0jrJEklhQ=; b=jCW17QAQWJcV9u9aZIhRdKVM/GOAZHMihqCINgJjHdfrQOAsZAH9wf84+NGlXGm/Tn RrNiDG4SGlvHITPc+9xpOoC9j0r+/80U+roHjqX+H3Gi93Oz7Ptxh5quwjEsBaCFBEhD BKt7IQpghO2GMQWXRFe975C3esBpw8wH5aA1E9rrZEHBfJOVuemR5kIfTencqvkem0Ok PuVPiSnA93KQJytP6uBMh60+pqw++4p5mnc9SBEDiBIwfQA2QVzSDbm1tabroOB6iX6a sXJuDCTv6XOM9e8k/saBIJuulCDBju1SGsHeaGbjz4DouYz8v/b95bGYiW0M5mh6J7DI 3ttQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532w8JdMNk5trkLjt4Im0hxVRTSQW7PsMC2QJJF3SZca5QX5lTpq bVT6u68HEMfV+5Uw+MBURaE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBfm26a17kKBEPC9zD89RNplNqQ9p7FXB3td+3ewVG49KZcHyqxVDg2Zs/f+VA6h0dZ1LYaw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1144:: with SMTP id b4mr20523650qvt.12.1615205063500; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:04:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from tbb-desktop ([201.213.132.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm7632188qkm.64.2021.03.08.04.04.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 04:04:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <604612c7.1c69fb81.bb823.da84@mx.google.com> X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <87im61ua0s.fsf@maurooaranda@gmail.com> From: Mauro Aranda To: 4110@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#4110: 23.1.50; Checkdoc should recognize "minor mode" References: <87fxaqmvzg.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:04:19 -0300 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:21:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4110 Cc: Lennart Borgman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lennart Borgman writes: > You can write "function `my-mode'" or "variable `my-mode'" in a doc > string to make checkdoc happy. However I would like to write "minor > mode `my-mode'" instead since it is more clear. And I think the > `my-mode' link should go to the function since that is wher the doc > string from define-minor-mode shows up. The change to allow this should be pretty simple: just add "mode" to the list of suggested words. But I do wonder if instead checkdoc should be happy just with the symbol ending with "-mode". IOW, I tend to think that there is no ambiguity in "`my-mode'" in a docstring, even if my-mode is defined as a variable and as a function. Any opinions? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 26 23:10:21 2021 Received: (at 4110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2021 03:10:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJSG4-0007K7-S8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:10:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54556) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJSG2-0007Jt-U9 for 4110@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:10:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zt9xo3dso6ndA3SQbymtRIID7IiqvgW8qZuH8tXYFg4=; b=HCYXaYSbXsUkIGgaSRVQcPzRlV 3Ohnfvl9/7+CYw/L4SQ6AEk/OhlkH6kKlXNv1wnPVg2jDHUJT5LCMi82ISjyYvH9LAHsQ/j68+uDG cKgZu1BSfAxrUp86mSpn/26kpCoChbjq6O0BlEnC6U6wAwkgQHQOV0/+GJoOdYBVUIcs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJSFt-0001DL-1M; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:10:13 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Mauro Aranda Subject: Re: bug#4110: 23.1.50; Checkdoc should recognize "minor mode" References: <87fxaqmvzg.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <604612c7.1c69fb81.bb823.da84@mx.google.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:10:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <604612c7.1c69fb81.bb823.da84@mx.google.com> (Mauro Aranda's message of "Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:04:19 -0300") Message-ID: <87tujbr3an.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Mauro Aranda writes: > The change to allow this should be pretty simple: just add "mode" to the > list of suggested words. > > But I do wonder if instead checkdoc should be happy just with the symbol > ending with "-mode" [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4110 Cc: Lennart Borgman , 4110@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Mauro Aranda writes: > The change to allow this should be pretty simple: just add "mode" to the > list of suggested words. > > But I do wonder if instead checkdoc should be happy just with the symbol > ending with "-mode". IOW, I tend to think that there is no ambiguity > in "`my-mode'" in a docstring, even if my-mode is defined as a variable > and as a function. > > Any opinions? Yes, I think that's a good idea -- requiring "mode" before `my-mode' seems excessive. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 26 23:10:26 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2021 03:10:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJSGA-0007KW-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:10:26 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJSG8-0007Jz-Aa for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:10:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=0Ghjdxsu+RFfTKE9us48sQky7sQ++KvLmVY1B2rrJAs=; b=f0D7ajiWfj5M4bg0TeuP9m1/Gk 6vLX12bE3pce0DS6dB5JpT+3f/G/QgMGKbh222PP9ZLz6QKJzCxyM4Lo5IaiaWEGbHP6KBWR5WQP5 LHBcEhQjzt8vuggS16Qp5/rw7sDA34z3xQUBy4/RVrGwwd2F2rLVuC4peYTmXR7vZk6U=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJSG0-0001DW-Km for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:10:18 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:10:16 +0200 Message-Id: <87sfyvr3af.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #4110 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 4110 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 4110 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 19 12:21:04 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2021 16:21:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRzYf-0002Fe-Tg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:21:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:38531) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRzYd-0002FP-7p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:20:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 5so9453664plo.5 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:20:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qFBGJ61F2z9cpSSKxlrgLm75PyyP2WhtCX2uxpeRO7s=; b=4rNMZbJXTnsVzg4DUpzv2nJQOPYaiDLahOZau8ee6Eg8W9jR+KTsl9tKqNQnOzRUM9 SB8g73P7CD9s7EymL7//uzf8TKDHGd04Ib/jAh+oPNBObzoMeBnax5kAnXvRiEluTx9b xlamKQY0pw1+U3pELzM3dLrW7WSgt5Qr9b/Fb6wGAzYrdGdFb4yuIilsI7/wItEKRzGx 8qFV+LawUxi5iGsa88xhCP5pO1jQPXKORmkzumzatBPU13DkYs6oj0zVgF/KjolUohRw L74P1Jy1n4xgY+TPXIJPdcNiFbH1f5fA3IYahGLIsIAF35v8nWlx92L/ZVFEn0pwMkBv blSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iFnMLXnWpdgNIBUDYoZi4M4RE1OxtALB5c7AOAK3iPL3gKihX Z4xQhJUb+n1gqbPXRNoc3tHjmPIapxvdyOnlCEOTRy+N X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBXO/XC9i8j9wDDzSpItRFDXHnnXpfcCT7RliGXLSJOQxOPDEhvm5eu0hhu1cZ7/MXwr4oab4xi2fhLJ51+rE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7c42:: with SMTP id e2mr32755454pjl.132.1632068441537; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:20:41 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:20:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 4110 - moreinfo tags 4110 confirmed thanks Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.214.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.214.175 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 4110 - moreinfo tags 4110 confirmed thanks Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager tags 4110 - moreinfo tags 4110 confirmed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 24 17:45:23 2021 Received: (at 4110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2021 21:45:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTt0U-000705-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:45:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:41600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTt0S-0006zh-Mw for 4110@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:45:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id x8so4580629plv.8 for <4110@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jh/COxzlgNQLFmx1ddEasbWFxC8sw1bXzKjPvjhO88k=; b=z2iTXZ4r6gi9AbTw7HqK1zFhE6mYBeIherkl2WgDxmbXN3mUkZuBkhY2CZVhYVHmWe 0omxI2zQEJhoKB/4IQSe6F/HsKSWpAiw89gvhEb70PmBmrhvPWN/RkN7tm3Irh44P+FC 69u6Gi7+/xapl+OdgIr5b8yi0ffPqvvW0lyoFGnAOVUGhv5Zt/JQFgl3nlE2/fLE5xTm TDN4hjC+qMeaX8RhtGdNVCbtJ04WHzJmoN/hNDUhiLiPLGTPcsrCtlED9lgc0CHf2agh 3vgaOsJL2P5EAhQxtPq/mvCKefzX1+obSdAWW7ipTahsOcyJCecQaaRkgLyarDmBEwA+ LHrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Et4IkQJMioEFZeZcc4BM8SPGXzq5OsRP3qxmvk3Uf1gm9HeEs sYUbWyt5S3eMlCU9H3l8Od5BB8LEokM+1oeX52s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCqTHDwy90rjptw5p6KRZiPXWxnUhYSRTykot0L2S7nWdiVekXrT8ektB8HWOFoTzMOe8lSSbNQnD0agSZM4Y= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:189:b0:13d:965f:e83f with SMTP id z9-20020a170903018900b0013d965fe83fmr11342394plg.32.1632519914853; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:14 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87tujbr3an.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:10:08 +0200") References: <87fxaqmvzg.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <604612c7.1c69fb81.bb823.da84@mx.google.com> <87tujbr3an.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#4110: 23.1.50; Checkdoc should recognize "minor mode" To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4110 Cc: 4110@debbugs.gnu.org, Lennart Borgman , Mauro Aranda X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 4110 fixed close 4110 28.1 thanks Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Mauro Aranda writes: > >> The change to allow this should be pretty simple: just add "mode" to the >> list of suggested words. >> >> But I do wonder if instead checkdoc should be happy just with the symbol >> ending with "-mode". IOW, I tend to think that there is no ambiguity >> in "`my-mode'" in a docstring, even if my-mode is defined as a variable >> and as a function. >> >> Any opinions? > > Yes, I think that's a good idea -- requiring "mode" before `my-mode' > seems excessive. I independently arrived at this conclusion, then I found this bug report. I agree that there is no confusion, and this check leads to a ton of such dubious warnings in the Emacs tree. So I've now fixed this on master (commit 79a9b50621). From unknown Fri Aug 15 03:37:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator