Subject: Re: bug#41099: 28.0.50; TRAMP process-file ignores exit status of remote process

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:11:28 +0300

Hi Michael,

On 14.05.2020 18:49, Michael Albinus wrote:
> I understand (and sympathize) both positions. However, Tramp has
> returned for decades no strings for process-file, so I don't expect any
> code in the wild which expects this.

But is there code in the wild that expects the _current_ behavior?

It sounds rather odd to me, given that such code would only be intended 
to run on remote systems, but never on the local one. Is that about right?