GNU bug report logs - #41097
28.0.50; (dired-toggle-marks) not working after copy

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>

Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 15:35:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 41097 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, tomasn <at> posteo.net, arthur.miller <at> live.com
Subject: bug#41097: 28.0.50; (dired-toggle-marks) not working after copy
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 20:32:01 +0300
* Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> [2020-05-10 19:28]:
> The doc has always spoken of "flagging" only for the
> deletion mark, `D', and that mark is also called a
> "flag" (_the_ flag).  It is the only mark that has
> ever been called a "flag".  It flags a possible
> danger -- "Hey! Over here. Watch out."

Thanks, that gives me more clariy.

> It should always be about "flagging for deletion".
> This is important because deletion is consequential.
> That's presumably the reason for having always used
> a special term for `D' marks.
> 
> "Flag", in the Dired context, is like a red flag --
> a warning, of sorts: "Pay attention! This marking
> is particularly important."  That's also the reason
> we font-lock `D'-marked lines specially (red!).

It makes sense to me now. Thank you.

Jean




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 86 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.