GNU bug report logs - #41097
28.0.50; (dired-toggle-marks) not working after copy

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>

Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 15:35:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: tomasn <at> posteo.net, 41097 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, arthur.miller <at> live.com, Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>
Subject: bug#41097: 28.0.50; (dired-toggle-marks) not working after copy
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 07:34:24 +0200
Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> IOW, explicitly say that toggling applies to `*' marks.

Yes, exactly.

> > But the inconsistency goes much further, we say that commands operate
> > on the "marked" files, but we mean only the *-marked files.
>
> See above.  (Are you talking about `t' here still?
> Why do you say "commands" (plural)?)

No, I mean commands, like

  dired-do-delete is an interactive compiled Lisp function in
  `dired.el'.
  [...]

  Delete all marked (or next ARG) files.

It doesn't say *-marked.  "Marked" typically means *-marked most of the
time.

> > (the term "marker character" is already used in the manual.)
>
> FWIW I don't understand why you added that part
> in parens to your message.

I only wanted to make clear that it's not a new term but one users that
read the manual are familiar with.  And it's maybe less misguiding than
"flag" (personally I could also live with just "character", since marks
are really just that).

Michael.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 86 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.