From unknown Thu Sep 11 17:28:42 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#41033 <41033@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#41033 <41033@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc Reply-To: bug#41033 <41033@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:28:42 +0000 retitle 41033 [PATCH] gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc reassign 41033 guix-patches submitter 41033 Christopher Howard severity 41033 normal tag 41033 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 02 18:48:09 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2020 22:48:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0vZ-0000sP-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:48:09 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0vX-0000sI-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:48:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0vW-0000fL-NK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:48:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0vV-0007rV-Ox for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:48:06 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.40]:12886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0vU-0007kk-Vu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:48:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F62400B2 for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 00:48:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= mime-version:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :subject:subject:message-id:received:received:received; s= dkim20160331; t=1588459680; x=1590274081; bh=R9B39EwdyzIqGt5sEr2 1cJL0TB2yTYwNKg+yfkEFMZA=; b=ThZA3kZJTscjZhMbOaEvU6meWAFG03QyvL0 xZqimQUczhuFvNzPfROSPfK/MMdgIeWD9d3gujQLhfg0I2ksR0HRtcXE3gAiNCi+ KRoj7HVZ16xFl3Wbu33LVsEQHz9VLswsztnlPaHZane6mop1uk3b0+QVCcp1zi5V 003BzGDHZ695jg8qfDVO2ZECJgzInDHjuDN5HVvB0INBwtoTBtwY1ZlJ13C+ZUQ5 S6bNB+yvYJF7PZWBcLWLhAsVkcuUbCCPZlcwuXkvxPuo97JiTsaxa2kZMibtslRv 6iyM1P11yp5P7mFzVkov7AWi6mxz5hyLTOJubLHPgS81JoowZSuyUwTh4uCl4oL+ pNJ+r5DDe6z/9FbRQWGZgMR8pv/aaASb21vimwGfudhj0A9ZS4k78kTIbuWPAc2q ABG2mUEfwaEi022rTqy8AQSO6KT/Foc4Oa/qQSXzKGS/Ie8vhrXuK9veA7RxHgyK pi0wHzHePIutu5PxLmjevNKmqZRu6/C+LCCEuZO/BkoXwgHXNR0fn6rqbDCxWNOe 01CP1rkhnlMN3AHa+UghQUV8XOl8XY7tsgPg55rQPnhc1q0g/Z6cE1cRa67NhJjM XO5s3y4727TVd8MZgqa6KJaFQ2lqPGhwgy44dMeW0xQ29NwtrIK2bV5uGIvvUIrI HfmyDhEs= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id akbZXx7eB2XV for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 00:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.1]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 108F6400AC for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 00:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2F5F17A for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 00:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1a3c1bf5091742ae78a5946c92a622206dcdf596.camel@librehacker.com> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc From: Christopher Howard To: guix-patches@gnu.org Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 14:47:56 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-J7qG6i+VFhwqwWO6EQwk" MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: none client-ip=95.128.36.40; envelope-from=christopher@librehacker.com; helo=mx.kolabnow.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 18:14:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 95.128.36.40 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-J7qG6i+VFhwqwWO6EQwk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I need libusb-0.1 to build some older software, but libusb-0.1 build fails due to a warning from the current GCC version. (Evidently libusb- 0.1 is set to die on any warning.) The attached patch silences the warning. -- Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net) --=-J7qG6i+VFhwqwWO6EQwk Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-libusb-0.1-fix-build-failure-on-newer-gcc.patch" Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-gnu-libusb-0.1-fix-build-failure-on-newer-gcc.patch"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RnJvbSAzNTFiYjcwMDRmOWJiZThkNTBiYmM3YTJlMmExY2IzOTAwNTUxZTI3IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBIb3dhcmQgPGNocmlzdG9waGVyQGxpYnJl aGFja2VyLmNvbT4KRGF0ZTogU2F0LCAyIE1heSAyMDIwIDE0OjQxOjAwIC0wODAwClN1YmplY3Q6 IFtQQVRDSF0gZ251OiBsaWJ1c2ItMC4xOiBmaXggYnVpbGQgZmFpbHVyZSBvbiBuZXdlciBnY2MK ClBhY2thZ2UgYnVpbGQgZmFpbHMgb24gdHJ1bmNhdGlvbiB3YXJuaW5nIGZyb20gY3VycmVudCBn Y2MuIFNpbGVuY2VzCnRoaXMgd2FybmluZy4KLS0tCiBnbnUvcGFja2FnZXMvbGlidXNiLnNjbSB8 IDQgKysrLQogMSBmaWxlIGNoYW5nZWQsIDMgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygrKSwgMSBkZWxldGlvbigtKQoK ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9saWJ1c2Iuc2NtIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL2xpYnVz Yi5zY20KaW5kZXggMDFjMTM4Y2I0ZS4uM2JiMmRjZDE4NiAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvZ251L3BhY2th Z2VzL2xpYnVzYi5zY20KKysrIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL2xpYnVzYi5zY20KQEAgLTgsNiArOCw3 IEBACiA7OzsgQ29weXJpZ2h0IMKpIDIwMTcgSm9uYXRoYW4gQnJpZWxtYWllciA8am9uYXRoYW4u YnJpZWxtYWllckB3ZWIuZGU+CiA7OzsgQ29weXJpZ2h0IMKpIDIwMTggVG9iaWFzIEdlZXJpbmNr eC1SaWNlIDxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3I+CiA7OzsgQ29weXJpZ2h0IMKpIDIwMTggVmFncmFudCBDYXNj YWRpYW4gPHZhZ3JhbnRAZGViaWFuLm9yZz4KKzs7OyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgwqkgMjAyMCBDaHJpc3Rv cGhlciBIb3dhcmQgPGNocmlzdG9waGVyQGxpYnJlaGFja2VyLmNvbT4KIDs7OwogOzs7IFRoaXMg ZmlsZSBpcyBwYXJ0IG9mIEdOVSBHdWl4LgogOzs7CkBAIC0xMTMsNyArMTE0LDggQEAgdmVyc2lv biBvZiBsaWJ1c2IgdG8gcnVuIHdpdGggbmV3ZXIgbGlidXNiLiIpCiAgICAgICAoc2hhMjU2CiAg ICAgICAgKGJhc2UzMgogICAgICAgICAiMGk0YmFjeGt5cjd4eXF4Ym1iMDB5cGtydjRzd2tnbTBt Z2hiempzbnc2Ymx2dmN6Z3hpcCIpKQotICAgICAgKHBhdGNoZXMgKHNlYXJjaC1wYXRjaGVzICJs aWJ1c2ItMC4xLWRpc2FibGUtdGVzdHMucGF0Y2giKSkpKSkpCisgICAgICAocGF0Y2hlcyAoc2Vh cmNoLXBhdGNoZXMgImxpYnVzYi0wLjEtZGlzYWJsZS10ZXN0cy5wYXRjaCIpKSkpCisgICAgKGFy Z3VtZW50cyBgKCM6Y29uZmlndXJlLWZsYWdzIChsaXN0ICJDRkxBR1M9LVduby1mb3JtYXQtdHJ1 bmNhdGlvbiIpKSkpKQogCiAoZGVmaW5lLXB1YmxpYyBsaWJ1c2I0amF2YQogICA7OyBUaGVyZSBp cyBubyBwdWJsaWMgcmVsZWFzZSBzbyB3ZSB0YWtlIHRoZSBsYXRlc3QgdmVyc2lvbiBmcm9tIGdp dC4KLS0gCjIuMjYuMgoK --=-J7qG6i+VFhwqwWO6EQwk-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 03 06:59:00 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2020 10:59:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVCKq-0000TY-AT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 06:59:00 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVCKo-0000TC-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 06:58:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVCKo-0003a0-DB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 06:58:58 -0400 Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:39504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVCKn-0006mo-0J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 06:58:58 -0400 Received: (qmail 26318 invoked by uid 1009); 3 May 2020 12:58:48 +0200 Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st (clamdscan: 0.98.6/25800. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st. Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. Processed in 0.023151 secs); 03 May 2020 10:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gravity) (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 3 May 2020 12:58:47 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 12:58:46 +0200 From: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= To: Christopher Howard Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc Message-ID: <20200503105846.fvouqze7r5qhb5nf@gravity> References: <1a3c1bf5091742ae78a5946c92a622206dcdf596.camel@librehacker.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4uahux66rjjjezgf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a3c1bf5091742ae78a5946c92a622206dcdf596.camel@librehacker.com> Received-SPF: none client-ip=37.59.186.212; envelope-from=kuba@kadziolka.net; helo=pat.zlotemysli.pl X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/03 06:58:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: guix-patches@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --4uahux66rjjjezgf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:47:56PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > I need libusb-0.1 to build some older software, but libusb-0.1 build > fails due to a warning from the current GCC version. (Evidently libusb- > 0.1 is set to die on any warning.) The attached patch silences the > warning. Thanks for your patch! I'm wondering though, whether it wouldn't be more resilient to add a -Wno-error flag instead. After all, the compiler is going to get upgraded sooner or later, which will introduce new warnings, and libusb 0.1 isn't getting any upgrades... A quick grep suggests that this wouldn't be the first package to disable Werror. Makes sense, since this mode is mostly useful to developers, and not packagers. What do you think? Kind regards, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka --4uahux66rjjjezgf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE5Xa/ss9usT31cTO54xWnWEYTFWQFAl6uo+UACgkQ4xWnWEYT FWT9+Q/9HjHQs3ctKLH6EnMjWfaOyxGmCPE7TjpTr8mMG1F1eR0ONLOnSxHe88Ac VItBgOUkh9On7dTvaLCP902lMn1oyvGvDADpIgf9COSr+X/U8RRHiSVACCe/4DeL Lf0+1nFItKgrpGPA4K9nwhKq8AExdbokMCtxpGQfmORbtcY0p7b9VZNTUSrEdcZK EJrlvv+EiLkyzB8ovmWqDSbyPpJ/3Oj6TcXaJFaXTzQtzQUfXb1YxXxuPSf6VuRZ QMA76RywZiZGRJBk+Qmka7FtP6YWlsh75Pd+DIwybrwGG4Sz/68atDNC9gOXVykC p3dSrwYqgxfpD4IaVLWNvzRxRRoVdp8dApoC89xZnvVGe0nn0Zqz47wPgqGPNiP4 IH1jvdhqBRRb8kfVJIxArZD0qpwxiHE8LtNt5DCoqCYO86GKbbk+sbltZa53YBSz Hbqbi+dGitNZlOZNhv2tYg+R7NyrTTspccdrtgixnskbO/BLLURq8unJeewjUUCn qDFQ2LjDxX11ifApTYZAs8KY5U3jHqVkeDQY6peTJSVDIvLZjWeekCUbC7grJ0wG UYYziXkzJBxkkEukjQuKp049UWxJsiEU5aXJzebkTN/ZdNKgbcAYKh24AgGnc4PN rxRGf/Ta1N1U+Hzaj89dsUXPP3uSMP6khFv5m2UDxG55Y2JawZk= =vddo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4uahux66rjjjezgf-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 03 12:13:47 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2020 16:13:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVHFS-0000iY-Rn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 12:13:47 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVHFP-0000iP-JJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 12:13:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVHFP-0000FO-9V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 12:13:43 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.42]:39140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVHFO-0000g9-16 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 12:13:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1AF65B; Sun, 3 May 2020 18:13:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:content-type :references:in-reply-to:date:date:from:from:subject:subject :message-id:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1588522417; x=1590336818; bh=t1BXUAhZxYoX3rfBlPX8TQBfL6ddnxnbPFr 52fG/WJE=; b=j2hBnHHJ3Bnr7bVqg0vrxFEjatGSSVt4q0Nz6eDwhcliP9hs7Lx Tu+hZT8Kgd6cuU/h0dmLHpbPE7Di1HzNd/gFvhfMkJhqCAzYuG+dbXbjTh4j5AVt 5KIEgCQ63LT1hB3wlnQDwmFvxWBHqQw30GNhy4E1zBmPlRF7bQQFnQyC9mhXIePq 9khKKqhD11KBgCPbfP+YvWHk8NBKXP4zRJBadlVfeGzDqpsAqGeKytpji4c+5jwA ktc3oQB/SPQwcF5D8mG6R4NASwiI2H/mlamHuiyVHS3dlX6jW0/tK3dfhsB93dB1 MTubSrxRwI1MFbv+SN4Ps8tnE2uT1SE6QlVAyIX1CofcCf8vwNep8bVi+pv37c7w H1QS1pTlFFQryIn8yMBw9UCZt4gIflCZQyYvq6Fo3tZhN0oIXtJqtxpKYqh1CZ17 mHnTTpvL/gAl11b5bSV5POThQUyFzfiy8aRaf9YzoBrc+bAJqIl94ktg7d0D7u5P /sujN+/BfKatwEEaF4BZwELL+7UvOMOlNEXGZeTQ3FSGeH3h+31fwlRI+i8BtRU3 LsFU0uHF+b1aUUI5W69+20D9KbBIc8QBiKdWNN0b2qcbebDB0b3EqFkgRc+QIzLH duoj7o7Fj+9m9Smd4Urm+dPgzzH0XV2C58cRFln3g1ayJzdlvCayMscE= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lx9yV2Urf4wY; Sun, 3 May 2020 18:13:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1BA435F; Sun, 3 May 2020 18:13:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51CEF12EBC; Sun, 3 May 2020 18:13:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc From: Christopher Howard To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 08:13:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200503105846.fvouqze7r5qhb5nf@gravity> References: <1a3c1bf5091742ae78a5946c92a622206dcdf596.camel@librehacker.com> <20200503105846.fvouqze7r5qhb5nf@gravity> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=95.128.36.42; envelope-from=christopher@librehacker.com; helo=mx.kolabnow.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/03 12:13:40 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: guix-patches@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Sounds good to me. Can you make the edit to the patch? -- Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net) On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 12:58 +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:47:56PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > > I need libusb-0.1 to build some older software, but libusb-0.1 > > build > > fails due to a warning from the current GCC version. (Evidently > > libusb- > > 0.1 is set to die on any warning.) The attached patch silences the > > warning. > > Thanks for your patch! I'm wondering though, whether it wouldn't be > more > resilient to add a -Wno-error flag instead. After all, the compiler > is > going to get upgraded sooner or later, which will introduce new > warnings, and libusb 0.1 isn't getting any upgrades... > > A quick grep suggests that this wouldn't be the first package to > disable > Werror. Makes sense, since this mode is mostly useful to developers, > and > not packagers. > > What do you think? > > Kind regards, > Jakub Kądziołka From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 03 16:57:04 2020 Received: (at 41033-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2020 20:57:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLfc-0001ZP-EX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 16:57:04 -0400 Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:37048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLfb-0001Z7-BZ for 41033-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 16:57:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 31115 invoked by uid 1009); 3 May 2020 22:57:01 +0200 Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st (clamdscan: 0.98.6/25800. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st. Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. Processed in 0.021163 secs); 03 May 2020 20:57:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gravity) (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 3 May 2020 22:57:01 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 22:56:59 +0200 From: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= To: Christopher Howard Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc Message-ID: <20200503205659.yee5vejdbqoic2c3@gravity> References: <1a3c1bf5091742ae78a5946c92a622206dcdf596.camel@librehacker.com> <20200503105846.fvouqze7r5qhb5nf@gravity> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lhquchwhgkyqvn3p" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41033-done Cc: 41033-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --lhquchwhgkyqvn3p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 08:13:32AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > Sounds good to me. Can you make the edit to the patch? Sure! I pushed the modified patch: commit 96e399ee30251a0767a45b2bde3f052b25c62714 (HEAD -> master, upstream/m= aster) Author: Christopher Howard Date: Sat May 2 14:41:00 2020 -0800 gnu: libusb-0.1: fix build failure on newer gcc * gnu/packages/libusb.scm (libusb-0.1): Disable -Werror. Signed-off-by: Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka Cheers! --lhquchwhgkyqvn3p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE5Xa/ss9usT31cTO54xWnWEYTFWQFAl6vMBcACgkQ4xWnWEYT FWQRMA/9EIyjFBDApsKuaNieoMUYVh40J4rZKmsf8eFQxHtGiPMrvveoJ+lC8jOs WFjJewl3MVcsLwIhLFJXVapRLJhmORyxe57V2vhsk17oQkuS0inPee18K8rRYz4l wAdL7vxfuILTwlpgqIgLxM29MqU/9NqXEMC+P6/gplJIJ450xtgiUTfi6Mqg5Xsm wXm5M073xU2rI2fQxjv3G9QKo4MCSoJ9UrQhbqt28UbclWUGXPw/+X5CA9gLUq6J jPjKG3r0M1nzY8FpKcIwjgdPhoi3vzSCbwCztXyFUzvWly9sUKOAsGy4rwczt0M1 wPxm0jBQBSGDBVUji2nJHnBAmzxOkoRWah02c95zmGEbr2T8KtZK2wCvLRnnvAXu oo2OKEO/wkWUUFXIZn40wmN5QFbmPbb1E72xx5Oj8moJ6Dl7nwpukGiOQeGnw5xu kNQhqb3n0dsbL4GP1UsEiC6t5X6fuAsWwWxTErJqy5kUqGptsIW2J3PMJWjsVx6D k767VLsMZ1c7OegxqSjQbAy/4lfqW1Eh7Hj+1Ewcs41R5+iZe753B71aDG8rVYth uLS8j8R1IDQTBKV0cV6RG1uQlf/8anSA3s0KSPy2yTmKx2mE2lhhpB/KNMnFZu5U vNXNUx/Y/d51N8jtIxwNw0rFit1gyoTzXrkebIcx95Wzrpf6OmA= =VBpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lhquchwhgkyqvn3p-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 17:28:42 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator