GNU bug report logs - #40967
27.0.50; vc-diff in indirect buffers

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 40967 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nathan Moreau <nathan.moreau <at> m4x.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, 40967 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
 Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>
Subject: Re: bug#40967: 27.0.50; vc-diff in indirect buffers
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 23:47:40 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

Gentle ping. This can be rebased on whichever branch you like if it does
not apply cleanly (currently it is based on d6f6353cfdbbea for because it
happened to be checked-out locally).

Nathan

On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 02:19, Nathan Moreau <nathan.moreau <at> m4x.org> wrote:

> Here is a new version of the patch, with support for most of the
> commands defined in vc.el.
>
> The support is not exhaustive as I was not able to make all commands work
> I did not succeed in testing all the commands: vc-delete-file and
> vc-rename-file are probably candidates next.
>
> Feedback is very welcome, I am not used to the contribution process on
> Emacs.
> Nathan
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 00:37, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> wrote:
> >
> > On 16.06.2020 15:08, Phil Sainty wrote:
> > > Personally I'd be ok with seeing piecemeal changes to commands
> > > like these to enable certain common workflows to DTRT with
> > > indirect buffers.
> >
> > All right then.
> >
> > > I think there will likely be a subset of
> > > commands which are of higher value than others, and so there
> > > might not be such a vast number of things which are very useful
> > > to change in practice.
> >
> > IDK, seems like it wouldn't simplify the proposed patch. It's short
> > already anywa.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.