Subject: bug#40967: 27.0.50; vc-diff in indirect buffers

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 21:32:28 +0300

On 03.10.2020 20:33, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Nathan Moreau <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
>> Thanks for having a look. This looks good to me.
> 
> Dmitry, do you have any comments here?  The feature makes sense to me
> conceptually, but I'm not a domain expert.

No objections from me.

I'm not a fan of using indirect buffers like this, but if you like the 
feature, and the patch works well for you, please go ahead.