GNU bug report logs - #40966
Missing substitutes on ci.guix.gnu.org?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: bug#40966: closed (Re: bug#40966: Missing substitutes on
 ci.guix.gnu.org?)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 17:20:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#40966: Missing substitutes on ci.guix.gnu.org?

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 40966 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
40966: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40966
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 40966-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40966: Missing substitutes on ci.guix.gnu.org?
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:19:31 -0400
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 12:19:07AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Do you still encounter these issues with current Cuirass?
> 
> If not, let's close this issue!

I don't think so, and I think Cuirass has changed enough that any
similar problem would have a different cause. Closing...

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Missing substitutes on ci.guix.gnu.org?
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:53:39 -0400
I've noticed that certain packages never seem to have substitutes
available from ci.guix.gnu.org.

This is not about packages that consistently fail to build, like Vigra
(LibreOffice) [0], but packages that never seem to be attempted at all,
and are not found when searching on the CI results.

For example, ncmpcpp has not been built since February 2020:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=spec%3Aguix-master+system%3Ax86_64-linux+ncmpcpp

And Borg has apparently never been built:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=spec%3Aguix-master+system%3Ax86_64-linux+borg

By the way, the dates that are shown in this interface do not display
the year (can we fix that?):

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2275489/details

[0] <https://bugs.gnu.org/40887>



This bug report was last modified 3 years and 290 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.