Subject: bug#40919: 27.0.91; next-error-select-buffer does not always behave as documented

From: Juri Linkov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 01:29:07 +0300

>>> Suggestions for a better (shorter?) name for the new function welcome, by
>>> the way.
>> Maybe next-error-find-keep-navigation.
>
> Short, but kinda cryptic (why "find"?). Not bad, but some other options:

Sorry, a typo, I meant next-error-keep-navigation.

> next-error-maybe-current-keep-navigation
> next-error-no-navigation-try-current

Not bad, I guess it's difficult to find a name that it both short and self-describing.