GNU bug report logs -
#40862
gnu: Add xarchiver.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 40862 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 40862 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#40862
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 08:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 08:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
[0001-gnu-Add-xarchiver.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#40862
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 09:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 40862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Raghav,
Thanks for this patch. When running 'guix lint' on this patch, I have
the following warnings:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
/home/mathieu/guix-master/gnu/packages/compression.scm:87:5: xarchiver <at> 0.5.4.14: the source file name should contain the package name
/home/mathieu/guix-master/gnu/packages/compression.scm:87:5: xarchiver <at> 0.5.4.14: the source URI should not be an autogenerated tarball
fetching CVE database for 2020......
fetching CVE database for 2019...
fetching CVE database for 2018...
fetching CVE database for 2017...
/home/mathieu/guix-master/gnu/packages/compression.scm:85:13: xarchiver <at> 0.5.4.14: can be upgraded to 0.5b2
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> +(define-public xarchiver
> + (package
> + (name "xarchiver")
> + (version "0.5.4.14")
> + (source
> + (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri
> + (string-append "https://github.com/ib/" name "/archive/"
> + version ".tar.gz"))
You should use "git-fetch" method for github repositories (see linter
warning above).
> + (list
> + "--disable-plugin"))) ; Not required
Why is it not required?
> + (synopsis "Graphical Front-end for Archive Operations")
No camel case notation.
> + (description "Xarchiver is the ultimate solution for handling archives. It
> +is a desktop-environment independent archiver front end.")
"Ultimate" is maybe exaggerated! Also you could elaborate a bit on the
functionalities of this tool.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#40862
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 09:54:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 40862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Mathieu!
> Thanks for this patch. When running 'guix lint' on this patch, I have
> the following warnings:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> /home/mathieu/guix-master/gnu/packages/compression.scm:87:5:
> xarchiver <at> 0.5.4.14: the source file name should contain the package name
> /home/mathieu/guix-master/gnu/packages/compression.scm:87:5:
> xarchiver <at> 0.5.4.14: the source URI should not be an autogenerated tarball
> fetching CVE database for 2020...... fetching CVE database for 2019...
> fetching CVE database for 2018... fetching CVE database for 2017...
> /home/mathieu/guix-master/gnu/packages/compression.scm:85:13:
> xarchiver <at> 0.5.4.14: can be upgraded to 0.5b2 --8<---------------cut
> here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> >
> > +(define-public xarchiver
> > + (package
> > + (name "xarchiver")
> > + (version "0.5.4.14")
> > + (source
> > + (origin
> > + (method url-fetch)
> > + (uri
> > + (string-append "https://github.com/ib/" name "/archive/"
> > + version ".tar.gz"))
>
> You should use "git-fetch" method for github repositories (see linter
> warning above).
>
> > + (list
> > + "--disable-plugin"))) ; Not required
>
> Why is it not required?
>
> > + (synopsis "Graphical Front-end for Archive Operations")
>
> No camel case notation.
>
> > + (description "Xarchiver is the ultimate solution for handling
> > archives. It +is a desktop-environment independent archiver front end.")
>
> "Ultimate" is maybe exaggerated! Also you could elaborate a bit on the
> functionalities of this tool.
Please find the revised patch attached with this email.
Regards,
RG.
[0001-gnu-Add-xarchiver.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#40862
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 40862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Raghav,
I applied 'fill-region' over the description, moved it to the end of
the file and pushed.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Reply sent
to
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:30:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:30:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 40862-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Raghav,
I applied 'fill-region' over the description, moved it to the end of
the file and pushed.
Thanks,
Mathieu
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 24 May 2020 11:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 88 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.