GNU bug report logs -
#40815
gnu: Add metamath
Previous Next
Reported by: "B. Wilson" <elaexuotee <at> wilsonb.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:55:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:02:37 +0200
with message-id <87a70jfqgi.fsf <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#40815] gnu: Add metamath
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40815,
regarding gnu: Add metamath
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
40815: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40815
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
This is my first packaging attempt, so careful critiques are very welcome.
The package definition itself is pretty bog standard, apart from how the "doc" output is supplied. Upstream provides the official documentation as a pdf offered separately from the source. I decided to include this as an input and manually copy it over. Upstream does also have a repo with the TeX sources. Would it be better to typset it directly instead?
Also, regarding my `install-doc' phase, is the way I copy over the /gnu/store/<hash>-metamath.pdf file reasonable? Unfortunately, `install-file' doesn't allow renaming the destination, so I had to mimic its effect. Is there a better, or more idiomatic way to do this kind of thing?
Anyway, cheers and guix!
[0001-gnu-Add-metamath.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
elaexuotee <at> wilsonb.com writes:
> I trust your initial impression on this one. Let's use the patch from my
> previous email that excises the commented out code. Does it look
> reasonable?
Certainly. I removed the book-revision and book-version bindings, since
they were not used in the current package definition, tweaked a bit the
description, and applied your patch.
I hope we can have the book either as a doc output, or as a separate
package, bundled at some point. Meanwhile, I'm closing this bug report.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 19 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.