GNU bug report logs - #40774
Error messages shouldn't be hidden when the user is idle

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 40774 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, ndame <at> protonmail.com
Subject: bug#40774: Error messages shouldn't be hidden when the user is idle
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:41:11 +0200

> From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org,  40774 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  ndame <at> protonmail.com
> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 22:54:53 +0200
> 
> >> > This whole discussion started from a request to be able to accumulate
> >> > messages in the echo-area so that the user who is away could see them
> >> > all when he/she comes back from whatever took him/her away.  There
> >> > could be quite a lot of messages accumulated during that period, and
> >> > the request was to leave them all on display.  For which you proposed
> >> > to use clear-message-function in a way that doesn't actually clear
> >> > them.
> >> >
> >> > Is the above an accurate description and summary of what is being
> >> > proposed here?  If so, is it now clear what kind of job I think
> >> > display of echo-area messages was never designed to support?
> >>
> >> Thanks for explanation, now it's clear where is the misunderstanding.
> >>
> >> Actually, the patch for clear-message-function here is unrelated
> >> to the feature that uses set-message-function to accumulate messages
> >> and doesn't use clear-message-function.
> >>
> >> The feature here is intended for users who want to always leave
> >> the last displayed message in the echo-area, and never clear it.
> >> It will be possible even to do this conditionally.
> >
> > But if messages aren't cleared, they will accumulate, and then we get
> > to the problems I described.  So it is not "unrelated", really.
> 
> When the message is not cleared, it will be displayed until another message
> will replace it.  This is unrelated to multi-message feature.

OK, then I guess it was a mistake to discuss this under this
particular bug report.

> > In any case, if this feature is unrelated, why do you want to have it
> > on the release branch?
> 
> This is another misunderstanding.  I didn't intend to have this
> on the release branch.  But since you mentioned it, why not?

Because we are done experimenting on the release branch.  Only
bugfixes should be installed there.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.