Subject: Re: bug#40750: Use error face for errors

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:38:52 +0100

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <[email-masked]> writes:

> I agree, but in theory there could be a customisable face for this that
> defaults to the current default.

That's true.

> But is it even possible to systematically tell whether a given message
> corresponds to an error?

I imagined `error' (and `signal'?) putting a face on the return value
from `format-message':

  (signal 'error (list (apply #'format-message args))))

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no