From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:12:16 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#40737 <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#40737 <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Reply-To: bug#40737 <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:12:16 +0000 retitle 40737 Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch reassign 40737 guile submitter 40737 dsmich@roadrunner.com severity 40737 important thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 20 15:34:38 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2020 19:34:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcBh-0004NF-NE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:34:38 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33761) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcBg-0004N8-6O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:34:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcBe-00029W-Uw for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:34:36 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_MIMEOLE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcBd-000285-OS for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:34:34 -0400 Received: from p-impout001aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.132]:44114 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcBd-00022j-8H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:34:33 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id QcBYjDzvR9GgiQcBZjTfdU; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:34:29 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Cb52G4jl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=8Wjwkxo3AAAA:20 a=AM0nc3y1yLe9o9kx8TYA:9 a=RyniExsqNeBSMlDh:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=AZw0f-kbwjuKNxJpVPIA:9 a=AZ3L2clSF_Uv2tD9:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Message-Id: <3583c04a12981cebf9a014b71c2d6f1a27b851af@webmail> From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'bug-guile@gnu.org'" X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:34:28 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_e94b0e78be25e009bc61fcccef08663f" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGmed2DomuF9GKrZnkmaNPFPuDWZ5bFQcs2jLGiqDjg43+IwJtUTmLsjGxp1LohOqExoxOy2ZDxSBQMwYYBs+IX9r+MaYh3E3HV+2GLiym9mfdR426Un nEkpUc2x8tlgNXeoAZ3EFtLb29ULASNk2/tcsp5DOZOev6x02vR6oBAZ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=47.43.26.132; envelope-from=dsmich@roadrunner.com; helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/20 15:34:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Received-From: 47.43.26.132 X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here is a backtrace of running guile on a builtroot constructed system for rpi3. Thumb2 instructions: BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=y Gcc 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION="7.5.0" Glibc. Uses the patch from https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/merge_requests/3 Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gitlab.com] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE 1.0 XPRIO Has X-Priority header X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here is a backtrace of running guile on a builtroot constructed system for rpi3. Thumb2 instructions: BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=y Gcc 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION="7.5.0" Glibc. Uses the patch from https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/merge_requests/3 Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gitlab.com] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE --=_e94b0e78be25e009bc61fcccef08663f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is a backtrace of running guile on a builtroot constructed system= =0Afor rpi3.=0AThumb2 instructions: BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=3Dy=0AGc= c 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION=3D"7.5.0"=0AGlibc.=0A=0AUses the patch from=0Ahtt= ps://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/merge_requests/3=0A=0AI hope this mak= es it through the mail client ok. =0A=0A-Dale=0A=0ACore was generated by= `guile'.=0AProgram terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.= =0A#0 0x76ee6f12 in ?? ()=0A[Current thread is 1 (LWP 507)]=0A(gdb) thre= ad apply all backtrace=0A=0AThread 5 (LWP 508):=0A#0 0x76e59674 in __lib= c_do_syscall () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnuea= bihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#1 0x76e5499e in pthread_cond_wait@@G= LIBC_2.4 () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf= /sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#2 0x76e7d7aa in GC_wait_marker () from= =0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib= /libgc.so.1=0A#3 0x76e7dab0 in GC_help_marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/r= pi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#4 0x= 76e7db26 in GC_mark_thread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildro= ot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#5 0x76e4fbb0 in start_t= hread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sy= sroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#6 0x76b450ec in ?? () from=0A/home/dales/br= /rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0ABacktrac= e stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A= =0AThread 4 (LWP 510):=0A#0 0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall () from=0A/h= ome/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthre= ad.so.0=0A#1 0x76e5499e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from=0A/home/= dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.s= o.0=0A#2 0x76e7d7aa in GC_wait_marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/= arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#3 0x76e7dab0= in GC_help_marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux= -gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#4 0x76e7db26 in GC_mark_thread= () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot= /usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#5 0x76e4fbb0 in start_thread () from=0A/home/dale= s/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0= =0A#6 0x76b450ec in ?? () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-l= inux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame= identical to this frame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A=0AThread 3 (LWP 511):=0A#= 0 0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-= buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#1 0x76e57720 in= read () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sy= sroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#2 0x76ef8aee in read_finalization_pipe_data= (data=3D0x74c1f95c) at=0Afinalizers.c:205=0A#3 0x76e7cea8 in GC_do_bloc= king_inner () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabi= hf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#4 0x76e7b068 in GC_with_callee_saves_pu= shed () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sys= root/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#5 0x76e7b094 in GC_do_blocking () from=0A/hom= e/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.= so.1=0A#6 0x76f3f10c in scm_without_guile (func=3D0x76ef8add , data=3D0x= 74c1f95c)=0Aat threads.c:706=0A#7 0x76ef8d7a in finalization_thread_proc= (unused=3D) at=0Afinalizers.c:218=0A#8 0x76eef876 in c_body (d=3D0x74c1= fe1c) at continuations.c:430=0A#9 0x76f4298e in vm_debug_engine (thread= =3D0x76a46c00) at=0Avm-engine.c:972=0A#10 0x76f47b9c in scm_call_n (proc= =3D0x7521dc70,=0Aargv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x74c1fbc0, nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D2= ) at vm.c:1608=0A#11 0x76ef22c4 in scm_call_2 (proc=3D, arg1=3D, arg2=3D= ) at eval.c:503=0A#12 0x76ef31a2 in scm_c_with_exception_handler (type= =3Dtype@entry=3D0x404,=0Ahandler=3D0x76f3f9b9 , handler_data=3Dhandler_d= ata@entry=3D0x74c1fda8, =0A thunk=3D0x76f3fa7d , thunk_data=3Dthunk_data= @entry=3D0x74c1fda8) at=0Aexceptions.c:170=0A#13 0x76f3fbd4 in scm_c_cat= ch (tag=3Dtag@entry=3D0x404,=0Abody=3Dbody@entry=3D0x76eef86d , body_dat= a=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c, =0A handler=3Dhandler@entry=3D0x76eefa= 1d ,=0Ahandler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c, =0A pre_unwind_ha= ndler=3Dpre_unwind_handler@entry=3D0x76eef8fb ,=0Apre_unwind_handler_dat= a=3Dpre_unwind_handler_data@entry=3D0x751fc300) at=0Athrow.c:168=0A--Typ= e for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--c=0A#14 0x76eefba2= in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=3D0x76eef86d ,=0Abody_data=3Db= ody_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c, handler=3D0x76eefa1d ,=0Ahandler_data=3Dhan= dler_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c,=0Apre_unwind_handler=3D0x76eef8fb , pre_un= wind_handler_data=3D0x751fc300) at=0Acontinuations.c:368=0A#15 0x76eefc0= 6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=3D, data=3D) at=0Acontinuatio= ns.c:464=0A#16 0x76f3edd4 in with_guile (base=3D0x74c1fe4c, data=3D0x74c= 1fe64) at=0Athreads.c:645=0A#17 0x76e78e98 in GC_call_with_stack_base ()= from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/us= r/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#18 0x76f3f0cc in scm_i_with_guile (dynamic_state=3D,= data=3D, func=3D) at=0Athreads.c:688=0A#19 scm_with_guile (func=3D, dat= a=3D) at threads.c:694=0A#20 0x76e4fbb0 in start_thread () from=0A/home/= dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.s= o.0=0A#21 0x76b450ec in ?? () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildro= ot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0ABacktrace stopped: previous f= rame identical to this frame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A=0AThread 2 (LWP 509):= =0A#0 0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/= arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#1 0x76e5499= e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-= buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#2 0x76e7d7aa in= GC_wait_marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gn= ueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#3 0x76e7dab0 in GC_help_marker ()= from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/us= r/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#4 0x76e7db26 in GC_mark_thread () from=0A/home/dales= /br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A= #5 0x76e4fbb0 in start_thread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buil= droot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#6 0x76b450ec in ??= () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot= /lib/libc.so.6=0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame identical to this fra= me (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A=0AThread 1 (LWP 507):=0A#0 0x76ee6f12 in scm_is= _pair (x=3D0x0) at pairs.h:182=0A#1 scm_sloppy_assq (key=3D0x752076f0, a= list=3D0x0) at alist.c:59=0A#2 0x76effef8 in scm_hash_fn_ref (table=3Dta= ble@entry=3D0x751da8b0,=0Aobj=3Dobj@entry=3D0x752076f0, dflt=3Ddflt@entr= y=3D0x4,=0Ahash_fn=3Dhash_fn@entry=3D0x76eff79d , assoc_fn=3D0x76ee6f0d= ,=0Aclosure=3Dclosure@entry=3D0x0) at hashtab.c:300=0A#3 0x76efff5c in= scm_hashq_ref (table=3D0x751da8b0,=0Akey=3Dkey@entry=3D0x752076f0, dflt= =3D0x4, dflt@entry=3D0x904) at hashtab.c:426=0A#4 0x76f11f74 in scm_modu= le_variable (module=3D0x74f281e0,=0Asym=3D0x752076f0) at modules.c:500= =0A#5 0x76f430c4 in vm_debug_engine (thread=3D0x76a46e00) at=0Avm-engine= .c:1560=0A#6 0x76f47b9c in scm_call_n (proc=3D0x74107800,=0Aargv=3Dargv@= entry=3D0x7eb8fb64, nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D1) at vm.c:1608=0A#7 0x76ef22b= 0 in scm_call_1 (proc=3D, arg1=3D) at eval.c:496=0A#8 0x76f4298e in vm_d= ebug_engine (thread=3D0x76a46e00) at=0Avm-engine.c:972=0A#9 0x76f47b9c i= n scm_call_n (proc=3D0x7521dc30,=0Aargv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x7eb8fdb0, nargs= =3Dnargs@entry=3D4) at vm.c:1608=0A#10 0x76ef22f4 in scm_call_4 (proc=3D= , arg1=3Darg1@entry=3D0x751fc300,=0Aarg2=3Darg2@entry=3D0x74d09810, arg3= =3Darg3@entry=3D0x76a4ab60,=0Aarg4=3Darg4@entry=3D0x7416c0b8) at eval.c:= 517=0A#11 0x76eea9a0 in scm_print_exception (port=3Dport@entry=3D0x751fc= 300,=0Aframe=3Dframe@entry=3D0x74d09810, key=3Dkey@entry=3D0x76a4ab60,= =0Aargs=3Dargs@entry=3D0x7416c0b8) at backtrace.c:121=0A#12 0x76eef994 i= n print_exception_and_backtrace (args=3D0x7416c0b8,=0Atag=3D0x76a4ab60,= port=3D0x751fc300) at continuations.c:415=0A#13 pre_unwind_handler (err= or_port=3D0x751fc300, tag=3D0x76a4ab60,=0Aargs=3D0x7416c0b8) at continua= tions.c:453=0A#14 0x76f3fa2e in catch_pre_unwind_handler (data=3D0x7eb91= c18,=0Aexn=3D0x74159fa0) at throw.c:135=0A#15 0x76f4298e in vm_debug_eng= ine (thread=3D0x76a46e00) at=0Avm-engine.c:972=0A#16 0x76f47b9c in scm_c= all_n (proc=3Dproc@entry=3D0x7521dc50,=0Aargv=3D0x7eb90068, nargs=3D5) a= t vm.c:1608=0A#17 0x76ef245a in scm_apply_0 (proc=3D0x7521dc50, args=3D0= x304) at=0Aeval.c:603=0A#18 0x76ef2afa in scm_apply_1 (proc=3D, arg1=3Da= rg1@entry=3D0x76a4ab60,=0Aargs=3Dargs@entry=3D0x74d098c8) at eval.c:609= =0A#19 0x76f3fd1c in scm_throw (key=3D0x76a4ab60, key@entry=3D0x76f8bd90= ,=0Aargs=3D0x74d098c8) at throw.c:262=0A#20 0x76f3fe22 in scm_ithrow (k= ey=3Dkey@entry=3D0x76f8bd90 , args=3D,=0Ano_return=3Dno_return@entry=3D1= ) at throw.c:457=0A#21 0x76ef0e66 in scm_error_scm (key=3Dkey@entry=3D0x= 76f8bd90 ,=0Asubr=3Dsubr@entry=3D0x4, message=3Dmessage@entry=3D0x76a4ab= 60,=0Aargs=3Dargs@entry=3D0x304, data=3D0x74d09948) at error.c:90=0A#22= 0x76f41c4a in bind_kwargs (thread=3D, npositional=3D, nlocals=3D14,=0Ak= wargs=3D0x75145ce0, strict=3D1 '01', allow_other_keys=3D0 '00') at=0Avm.= c:1015=0A#23 0x7500c6e4 in ?? ()=0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame ide= ntical to this frame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A=0A(gdb) info reg=0Ar0 0x75207= 6f0 1965061872=0Ar1 0x0 0=0Ar2 0x0 0=0Ar3 0x76ee6f0d 1995337485=0Ar4 0x4= 4=0Ar5 0x76f7c000 1995948032=0Ar6 0x751da8b0 1964878000=0Ar7 0x752076f0= 1965061872=0Ar8 0x3 3=0Ar9 0x74c6d160 1959186784=0Ar10 0x76f8c7e4 19960= 15588=0Ar11 0x76f7c000 1995948032=0Ar12 0x76f7c288 1995948680=0Asp 0x7eb= 8f8d8 0x7eb8f8d8=0Alr 0x76effef9 1995439865=0Apc 0x76ee6f12 0x76ee6f12= =0Acpsr 0x40000030 1073741872=0Afpscr 0x0 0=0A=0A(gdb) disassem /r 0x76= ee6f12,+8=0ADump of assembler code from 0x76ee6f12 to 0x76ee6f1a:=0A=3D>= 0x76ee6f12 : 0b 68 ldr r3, [r1, #0]=0A 0x76ee6f14 : da 07 lsls r2, r3,= #31=0A 0x76ee6f16 : 0a d4 bmi.n 0x76ee6f2e =0A 0x76ee6f18 : 13 f0 06 0f= tst.w r3, #6=0AEnd of assembler dump.=0A=0A --=_e94b0e78be25e009bc61fcccef08663f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is a backtrace of running guile on a builtroot construc= ted system for rpi3.
Thumb2 instructions: BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2= =3Dy
Gcc 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION=3D"7.5.0"
Glibc.

Uses the pat= ch from https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/merge_requests/3

I= hope this makes it through the mail client ok. 

-Dale
<= br>Core was generated by `guile'.
Program terminated with signal SIGS= EGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x76ee6f12 in ?? ()
[Current thr= ead is 1 (LWP 507)]
(gdb) thread apply all backtrace

Thread 5= (LWP 508):
#0  0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall () from /home/da= les/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.= 0
#1  0x76e5499e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from /home/d= ales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so= .0
#2  0x76e7d7aa in GC_wait_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/h= ost/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#3 = 0x76e7dab0 in GC_help_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildr= oot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#4  0x76e7db26 in= GC_mark_thread () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnue= abihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#5  0x76e4fbb0 in start_thread= () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/l= ib/libpthread.so.0
#6  0x76b450ec in ?? () from /home/dales/br/r= pi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
Backtrace= stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 4 (LWP 510):
#0  0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall () from= /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpt= hread.so.0
#1  0x76e5499e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () fro= m /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libp= thread.so.0
#2  0x76e7d7aa in GC_wait_marker () from /home/dales= /br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1#3  0x76e7dab0 in GC_help_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/a= rm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#4  0x76= e7db26 in GC_mark_thread () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-l= inux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#5  0x76e4fbb0 in star= t_thread () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/s= ysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#6  0x76b450ec in ?? () from /home/da= les/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
B= acktrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?= )

Thread 3 (LWP 511):
#0  0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall= () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/l= ib/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x76e57720 in read () from /home/dales/br= /rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#= 2  0x76ef8aee in read_finalization_pipe_data (data=3D0x74c1f95c) at= finalizers.c:205
#3  0x76e7cea8 in GC_do_blocking_inner () from= /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/l= ibgc.so.1
#4  0x76e7b068 in GC_with_callee_saves_pushed () from= /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/l= ibgc.so.1
#5  0x76e7b094 in GC_do_blocking () from /home/dales/b= r/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#= 6  0x76f3f10c in scm_without_guile (func=3D0x76ef8add <read_fina= lization_pipe_data>, data=3D0x74c1f95c) at threads.c:706
#7 = 0x76ef8d7a in finalization_thread_proc (unused=3D<optimized out>)= at finalizers.c:218
#8  0x76eef876 in c_body (d=3D0x74c1fe1c) a= t continuations.c:430
#9  0x76f4298e in vm_debug_engine (thread= =3D0x76a46c00) at vm-engine.c:972
#10 0x76f47b9c in scm_call_n (proc= =3D0x7521dc70, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x74c1fbc0, nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D2)= at vm.c:1608
#11 0x76ef22c4 in scm_call_2 (proc=3D<optimized out&= gt;, arg1=3D<optimized out>, arg2=3D<optimized out>) at eval= .c:503
#12 0x76ef31a2 in scm_c_with_exception_handler (type=3Dtype@en= try=3D0x404, handler=3D0x76f3f9b9 <catch_post_unwind_handler>, han= dler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x74c1fda8,
    thun= k=3D0x76f3fa7d <catch_body>, thunk_data=3Dthunk_data@entry=3D0x74c= 1fda8) at exceptions.c:170
#13 0x76f3fbd4 in scm_c_catch (tag=3Dtag@e= ntry=3D0x404, body=3Dbody@entry=3D0x76eef86d <c_body>, body_data= =3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c,
    handler=3Dhandle= r@entry=3D0x76eefa1d <c_handler>, handler_data=3Dhandler_data@entr= y=3D0x74c1fe1c,
    pre_unwind_handler=3Dpre_unwind_h= andler@entry=3D0x76eef8fb <pre_unwind_handler>, pre_unwind_handler= _data=3Dpre_unwind_handler_data@entry=3D0x751fc300) at throw.c:168
--= Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--c#14 0x76eefba2 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (body=3D0x76eef86d &l= t;c_body>, body_data=3Dbody_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c, handler=3D0x76ee= fa1d <c_handler>, handler_data=3Dhandler_data@entry=3D0x74c1fe1c,= pre_unwind_handler=3D0x76eef8fb <pre_unwind_handler>, pre_unwind_= handler_data=3D0x751fc300) at continuations.c:368
#15 0x76eefc06 in s= cm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=3D<optimized out>, data=3D<= ;optimized out>) at continuations.c:464
#16 0x76f3edd4 in with_gui= le (base=3D0x74c1fe4c, data=3D0x74c1fe64) at threads.c:645
#17 0x76e7= 8e98 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buil= droot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#18 0x76f3f0cc in sc= m_i_with_guile (dynamic_state=3D<optimized out>, data=3D<optimi= zed out>, func=3D<optimized out>) at threads.c:688
#19 scm_w= ith_guile (func=3D<optimized out>, data=3D<optimized out>) a= t threads.c:694
#20 0x76e4fbb0 in start_thread () from /home/dales/br= /rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#= 21 0x76b450ec in ?? () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-= gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
Backtrace stopped: previous frame ide= ntical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

Thread 2 (LWP 509):
#0&n= bsp; 0x76e59674 in __libc_do_syscall () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm= -buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x76e= 5499e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/ar= m-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#2  0x76= e7d7aa in GC_wait_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-l= inux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#3  0x76e7dab0 in GC_h= elp_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf= /sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#4  0x76e7db26 in GC_mark_thread ()= from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/= lib/libgc.so.1
#5  0x76e4fbb0 in start_thread () from /home/dale= s/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0<= br>#6  0x76b450ec in ?? () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildro= ot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
Backtrace stopped: previous= frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

Thread 1 (LWP 507= ):
#0  0x76ee6f12 in scm_is_pair (x=3D0x0) at pairs.h:182
#1&= nbsp; scm_sloppy_assq (key=3D0x752076f0, alist=3D0x0) at alist.c:59
#= 2  0x76effef8 in scm_hash_fn_ref (table=3Dtable@entry=3D0x751da8b0,= obj=3Dobj@entry=3D0x752076f0, dflt=3Ddflt@entry=3D0x4, hash_fn=3Dhash_f= n@entry=3D0x76eff79d <scm_ihashq>, assoc_fn=3D0x76ee6f0d <scm_s= loppy_assq>, closure=3Dclosure@entry=3D0x0) at hashtab.c:300
#3&nb= sp; 0x76efff5c in scm_hashq_ref (table=3D0x751da8b0, key=3Dkey@entry=3D0= x752076f0, dflt=3D0x4, dflt@entry=3D0x904) at hashtab.c:426
#4 = 0x76f11f74 in scm_module_variable (module=3D0x74f281e0, sym=3D0x752076f= 0) at modules.c:500
#5  0x76f430c4 in vm_debug_engine (thread=3D= 0x76a46e00) at vm-engine.c:1560
#6  0x76f47b9c in scm_call_n (pr= oc=3D0x74107800, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x7eb8fb64, nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D1= ) at vm.c:1608
#7  0x76ef22b0 in scm_call_1 (proc=3D<optimize= d out>, arg1=3D<optimized out>) at eval.c:496
#8  0x76f= 4298e in vm_debug_engine (thread=3D0x76a46e00) at vm-engine.c:972
#9&= nbsp; 0x76f47b9c in scm_call_n (proc=3D0x7521dc30, argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0= x7eb8fdb0, nargs=3Dnargs@entry=3D4) at vm.c:1608
#10 0x76ef22f4 in sc= m_call_4 (proc=3D<optimized out>, arg1=3Darg1@entry=3D0x751fc300,= arg2=3Darg2@entry=3D0x74d09810, arg3=3Darg3@entry=3D0x76a4ab60, arg4=3D= arg4@entry=3D0x7416c0b8) at eval.c:517
#11 0x76eea9a0 in scm_print_ex= ception (port=3Dport@entry=3D0x751fc300, frame=3Dframe@entry=3D0x74d0981= 0, key=3Dkey@entry=3D0x76a4ab60, args=3Dargs@entry=3D0x7416c0b8) at back= trace.c:121
#12 0x76eef994 in print_exception_and_backtrace (args=3D0= x7416c0b8, tag=3D0x76a4ab60, port=3D0x751fc300) at continuations.c:415#13 pre_unwind_handler (error_port=3D0x751fc300, tag=3D0x76a4ab60, arg= s=3D0x7416c0b8) at continuations.c:453
#14 0x76f3fa2e in catch_pre_un= wind_handler (data=3D0x7eb91c18, exn=3D0x74159fa0) at throw.c:135
#15= 0x76f4298e in vm_debug_engine (thread=3D0x76a46e00) at vm-engine.c:972<= br>#16 0x76f47b9c in scm_call_n (proc=3Dproc@entry=3D0x7521dc50, argv=3D= 0x7eb90068, nargs=3D5) at vm.c:1608
#17 0x76ef245a in scm_apply_0 (pr= oc=3D0x7521dc50, args=3D0x304) at eval.c:603
#18 0x76ef2afa in scm_ap= ply_1 (proc=3D<optimized out>, arg1=3Darg1@entry=3D0x76a4ab60, arg= s=3Dargs@entry=3D0x74d098c8) at eval.c:609
#19 0x76f3fd1c in scm_thro= w (key=3D0x76a4ab60, key@entry=3D0x76f8bd90 <throw_var>, args=3D0x= 74d098c8) at throw.c:262
#20 0x76f3fe22 in scm_ithrow (key=3Dkey@entr= y=3D0x76f8bd90 <throw_var>, args=3D<optimized out>, no_retur= n=3Dno_return@entry=3D1) at throw.c:457
#21 0x76ef0e66 in scm_error_s= cm (key=3Dkey@entry=3D0x76f8bd90 <throw_var>, subr=3Dsubr@entry=3D= 0x4, message=3Dmessage@entry=3D0x76a4ab60, args=3Dargs@entry=3D0x304, da= ta=3D0x74d09948) at error.c:90
#22 0x76f41c4a in bind_kwargs (thread= =3D<optimized out>, npositional=3D<optimized out>, nlocals= =3D14, kwargs=3D0x75145ce0, strict=3D1 '\001', allow_other_keys=3D0 '\00= 0') at vm.c:1015
#23 0x7500c6e4 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previo= us frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

(gdb) info reg<= br>r0           &= nbsp; 0x752076f0          1= 965061872
r1         &nb= sp;   0x0         = ;        0
r2   &nb= sp;         0x0   = ;            = ;  0
r3         &nb= sp;   0x76ee6f0d       &nbs= p;  1995337485
r4        = ;     0x4       &= nbsp;         4
r5  = ;           0x76f7c000=           1995948032
r6&= nbsp;           = 0x751da8b0          196487= 8000
r7          &n= bsp;  0x752076f0        &nb= sp; 1965061872
r8        &nbs= p;    0x3        =          3
r9  &nbs= p;          0x74c6d160 = ;         1959186784
r10 = ;           0x76f8c7e4=           1996015588
r11=             0x76f= 7c000          1995948032r12           = 0x76f7c288          199594= 8680
sp          &n= bsp;  0x7eb8f8d8        &nb= sp; 0x7eb8f8d8
lr        &nbs= p;    0x76effef9       = ;   1995439865
pc       =       0x76ee6f12     &= nbsp;    0x76ee6f12 <scm_sloppy_assq+6>
cpsr&nbs= p;          0x40000030 = ;         1073741872
fpscr&nb= sp;         0x0   = ;            = ;  0

(gdb) disassem /r 0x76ee6f12,+8
Dump of assembler co= de from 0x76ee6f12 to 0x76ee6f1a:
=3D> 0x76ee6f12 <scm_sloppy_a= ssq+6>:      0b 68   ldr &nbs= p;   r3, [r1, #0]
   0x76ee6f14 <scm_sloppy_as= sq+8>:      da 07   lsls &nbs= p;  r2, r3, #31
   0x76ee6f16 <scm_sloppy_assq+10&g= t;:     0a d4   bmi.n   0x76ee6f= 2e <scm_sloppy_assq+34>
   0x76ee6f18 <scm_sloppy_= assq+12>:     13 f0 06 0f    = tst.w   r3, #6
End of assembler dump.

--=_e94b0e78be25e009bc61fcccef08663f-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 20 15:42:08 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2020 19:42:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcIx-0004Zk-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:42:08 -0400 Received: from p-impout006aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.137]:46162 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcIv-0004Z8-JA for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:42:06 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id QcIpjBbse4hsvQcIpj1ifU; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:41:59 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=F9QpiZpN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=O6dw2x9lFzyInsTHSoEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=kuPfjAebY3YX0fA8V-kA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Message-Id: From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: Forgot command output Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:41:59 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_f6e862b50aa883f33528fd7925a6ccc9" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfD4wfHaPkzh0+heyzIaCVV7P3fnqsQGB0OHk5JgG5RPOr6+nKVPb2ZDrDmq+YvWUp17u1YaPRrdbdiC6opVFOQkI6kTF46ERmitpAGJoZXDO7JM+sjzc GBVrkXjvD/71Y1cxE1/f2ACA6x2G+QLRRxwPHA6yZrGoyhrMGBmvOvk0 X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: # ulimit -c unlimited # guile Backtrace: Exception thrown while printing backtrace: Unrecognized keyword: #:exports Segmentation fault (core dumped) -Dale Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_f6e862b50aa883f33528fd7925a6ccc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # ulimit -c unlimited=0A# guile=0ABacktrace:=0AException thrown while pr= inting backtrace:=0AUnrecognized keyword: #:exports=0A=0ASegmentation fa= ult (core dumped)=0A=0A-Dale=0A=0A --=_f6e862b50aa883f33528fd7925a6ccc9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # ulimit -c unlimited
# guile
Backtrace:
Exception= thrown while printing backtrace:
Unrecognized keyword: #:exports
=
Segmentation fault (core dumped)


-Dale

--=_f6e862b50aa883f33528fd7925a6ccc9-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 20 15:48:11 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2020 19:48:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcOp-0004jk-FI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:48:11 -0400 Received: from p-impout003aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.134]:56180 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQcOn-0004jV-OV for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:48:10 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id QcOhjLXadSkogQcOhjZg1w; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:48:03 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=eKttc0h1 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=Q6Nauhto6WU0tmL2y0EA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=u2qxKXbuWw_W2fVogRAA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Message-Id: <341d9d3072349be09b215117d778cf1233919305@webmail> From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: Even more info Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:48:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_fcb8f63a2eb0cf97cc0a1f393482e2c4" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEuk1XAN2tg4N0A+sIvL0ijpWJsFmTjhSTAyfqedEqpTT5CwSemgYjJecKm+vncjP3f5COFPIL9LciWPEwDk+xV/qlK7tvrZNTd+KFaERgXdubJ8vt5M A9d32XX6c3ohmh8tLwmWR25N5m5H1zZ1CAQ8oo+GDU02EJkhdz8zT4Gp X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Also forgot to mention this is guile 3.0.2. It doesn't fail all the time. When run with GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=-1 , there are never any problems. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_fcb8f63a2eb0cf97cc0a1f393482e2c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also forgot to mention this is guile 3.0.2.=0A=0AIt doesn't fail all the= time.=0A=0AWhen run with GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D-1 , there are never any= problems.=0A=0AWith GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 , it always fails, but I'm= not sure it's in=0Athe same place.=0A=0A-Dale=0A=0A --=_fcb8f63a2eb0cf97cc0a1f393482e2c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also forgot to mention this is guile 3.0.2.

It doesn'= t fail all the time.

When run with GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D-1 , the= re are never any problems.

With GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 , it alwa= ys fails, but I'm not sure it's in the same place.

-Dale

<= /body> --=_fcb8f63a2eb0cf97cc0a1f393482e2c4-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 21 08:37:02 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2020 12:37:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49130 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQs98-0000Si-40 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:37:02 -0400 Received: from p-impout007aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.138]:48384 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQs95-0000SA-Ls for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:37:00 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id Qs8yjmbHgqjkdQs8zjVuEn; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:36:53 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=SZ2JicZu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=sHr4OyxSuDP5ra09z1IA:9 a=7-XBvb30tWAYBIiw:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=gjY9bPtbgme1RsSi8T4A:9 a=TURxAnHJM-NO0QM4:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Message-Id: <5403654b1db917ec825daef46ac98cdbf3634eeb@webmail> From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: RE: bug#40737: Even more info Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:36:52 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_9fc0a916d0fe2740189b6e9b911d9ae0" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfN5mnhPfSlJgPOEz4uq1hXMpMZJqSDfZ0G0NKkTj+KF4Gyqv5gHzpQKyi2dBetTsIOvFjTaO0hWbOvdQEl47d6ZBMYlsNJEPvNuRvXkqUcNemRq/Wion HBQvldt6sGa5K/GkmKzrWnz4oVxRybqvcwmcgWr+qz68rCfK13PXO7CE X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: And with threshold set to 0: # GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=0 guile Pre-boot error; key: misc-error, args: (#f "parent is not a exception type ~S" (#) #f)Aborted (core dumped) Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x76acd6b6 in ?? () [Current thread is 1 (LWP 515)] (gdb) thread apply all backtrace Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [47.43.26.138 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_9fc0a916d0fe2740189b6e9b911d9ae0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And with threshold set to 0:=0A=0A# GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 guile=0APre-= boot error; key: misc-error, args: (#f "parent is not a exception=0Atype= ~S" (#) #f)Aborted (core dumped)=0A=0AProgram terminated with signal SI= GABRT, Aborted.=0A#0 0x76acd6b6 in ?? ()=0A[Current thread is 1 (LWP 515= )]=0A(gdb) thread apply all backtrace=0A=0AThread 4 (LWP 518):=0A#0 0x76= e5f674 in __libc_do_syscall () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildr= oot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#1 0x76e5a99e in pthre= ad_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-= linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#2 0x76e837aa in GC_wait_m= arker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sy= sroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#3 0x76e83ab0 in GC_help_marker () from=0A/ho= me/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc= .so.1=0A#4 0x76e83b26 in GC_mark_thread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/hos= t/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#5 0x76e55b= b0 in start_thread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux= -gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#6 0x76b4b0ec in ?? () from=0A/= home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so= .6=0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt= =0Astack?)=0A=0AThread 3 (LWP 516):=0A#0 0x76e5f674 in __libc_do_syscall= () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot= /lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#1 0x76e5a99e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 ()= from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/li= b/libpthread.so.0=0A#2 0x76e837aa in GC_wait_marker () from=0A/home/dale= s/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1= =0A#3 0x76e83ab0 in GC_help_marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm= -buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#4 0x76e83b26 in= GC_mark_thread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gn= ueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#5 0x76e55bb0 in start_thread () fr= om=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/l= ibpthread.so.0=0A#6 0x76b4b0ec in ?? () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/a= rm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0ABacktrace stopped:= previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A=0AThread 2= (LWP 517):=0A#0 0x76e5f674 in __libc_do_syscall () from=0A/home/dales/b= r/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#= 1 0x76e5a99e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from=0A/home/dales/br/rp= i/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#2 0x= 76e837aa in GC_wait_marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildro= ot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#3 0x76e83ab0 in GC_help= _marker () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/= sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1=0A#4 0x76e83b26 in GC_mark_thread () from=0A/= home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/lib= gc.so.1=0A#5 0x76e55bb0 in start_thread () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/hos= t/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0=0A#6 0x76b4b= 0ec in ?? () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabih= f/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame identical to= this frame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A=0AThread 1 (LWP 515):=0A#0 0x76acd6b6= in __libc_do_syscall () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-li= nux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0A#1 0x76adbc70 in raise () from=0A/= home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so= .6=0A#2 0x76adc73e in abort () from=0A/home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildr= oot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6=0A#3 0x76f45ce8 in scm_throw (= key=3D0x76fb92b0, key@entry=3D0x0,=0Aargs=3D0x76a57360) at throw.c:264= =0A#4 0x76f0b97e in throw_ (args=3D, key=3D0x0) at intrinsics.c:352=0A#5= throw_with_value (val=3D, key_subr_and_message=3D) at intrinsics.c:367= =0A#6 0x74f473da in ?? ()=0A--Type for more, q to quit, c to continue w= ithout paging--c=0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame identical to this f= rame (corrupt=0Astack?)=0A(gdb) info reg=0Ar0 0x0 0=0Ar1 0x7ef92688 2130= 257544=0Ar2 0x0 0=0Ar3 0x8 8=0Ar4 0x0 0=0Ar5 0x7ef92688 2130257544=0Ar6= 0x76a57360 1990554464=0Ar7 0xaf 175=0Ar8 0x75207308 1965060872=0Ar9 0x7= 5207208 1965060616=0Ar10 0x4 4=0Ar11 0x76f82000 1995972608=0Ar12 0xaf 17= 5=0Asp 0x7ef92680 0x7ef92680=0Alr 0x76adbc71 1991097457=0Apc 0x76acd6b6= 0x76acd6b6 =0Acpsr 0x30 48=0Afpscr 0x0 0=0A(gdb) disassem /r 0x76acd6b6= ,+8=0ADump of assembler code from 0x76acd6b6 to 0x76acd6be:=0A=3D> 0x76a= cd6b6 : 80 bd pop {r7, pc}=0A 0x76acd6b8 : 03 4b ldr r3, [pc, #12] ; (0x= 76acd6c8 )=0A 0x76acd6ba : 1d ee 70 0f mrc 15, 0, r0, cr13, cr0, {3}=0AE= nd of assembler dump.=0A(gdb) =0A=0A --=_9fc0a916d0fe2740189b6e9b911d9ae0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And with threshold set to 0:

# GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D= 0 guile
Pre-boot error; key: misc-error, args: (#f "parent is not a e= xception type ~S" (#<record-type &programming-error>) #f)Abort= ed (core dumped)



Program terminated with signal SIGABRT,= Aborted.
#0  0x76acd6b6 in ?? ()
[Current thread is 1 (LWP 5= 15)]
(gdb) thread apply all backtrace

Thread 4 (LWP 518):
#= 0  0x76e5f674 in __libc_do_syscall () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/= arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x= 76e5a99e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host= /arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#2  0= x76e837aa in GC_wait_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroo= t-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#3  0x76e83ab0 in G= C_help_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueab= ihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#4  0x76e83b26 in GC_mark_thread= () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/u= sr/lib/libgc.so.1
#5  0x76e55bb0 in start_thread () from /home/d= ales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so= .0
#6  0x76b4b0ec in ?? () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buil= droot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
Backtrace stopped: previo= us frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

Thread 3 (LWP 5= 16):
#0  0x76e5f674 in __libc_do_syscall () from /home/dales/br/= rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1=   0x76e5a99e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from /home/dales/br= /rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.so.0
#= 2  0x76e837aa in GC_wait_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm= -buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#3  0x76e8= 3ab0 in GC_help_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-lin= ux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#4  0x76e83b26 in GC_mar= k_thread () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/s= ysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#5  0x76e55bb0 in start_thread () from= /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpt= hread.so.0
#6  0x76b4b0ec in ?? () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/= arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
Backtrace stopped= : previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

Thread= 2 (LWP 517):
#0  0x76e5f674 in __libc_do_syscall () from /home/= dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.s= o.0
#1  0x76e5a99e in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.4 () from /home= /dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libpthread.= so.0
#2  0x76e837aa in GC_wait_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi= /host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#3&nbs= p; 0x76e83ab0 in GC_help_marker () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buil= droot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#4  0x76e83b26= in GC_mark_thread () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-g= nueabihf/sysroot/usr/lib/libgc.so.1
#5  0x76e55bb0 in start_thre= ad () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot= /lib/libpthread.so.0
#6  0x76b4b0ec in ?? () from /home/dales/br= /rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
Backtra= ce stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
<= br>Thread 1 (LWP 515):
#0  0x76acd6b6 in __libc_do_syscall () fr= om /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/lib= c.so.6
#1  0x76adbc70 in raise () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/a= rm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf/sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x76adc73= e in abort () from /home/dales/br/rpi/host/arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf= /sysroot/lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x76f45ce8 in scm_throw (key=3D0x76fb= 92b0, key@entry=3D0x0, args=3D0x76a57360) at throw.c:264
#4  0x7= 6f0b97e in throw_ (args=3D<optimized out>, key=3D0x0) at intrinsic= s.c:352
#5  throw_with_value (val=3D<optimized out>, key_s= ubr_and_message=3D<optimized out>) at intrinsics.c:367
#6 = 0x74f473da in ?? ()
--Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to con= tinue without paging--c
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical t= o this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) info reg
r0   &= nbsp;         0x0  &nb= sp;           &nb= sp;  0
r1         &= nbsp;   0x7ef92688       &n= bsp;  2130257544
r2       &nb= sp;     0x0       = ;          0
r3 &nb= sp;           0x8 = ;            = ;    8
r4       &nb= sp;     0x0       = ;          0
r5 &nb= sp;           0x7ef926= 88          2130257544
r= 6            = ; 0x76a57360          19905= 54464
r7          &= nbsp;  0xaf         &n= bsp;      175
r8    &nbs= p;        0x75207308   = ;       1965060872
r9   =           0x75207208 &= nbsp;        1965060616
r10 &= nbsp;          0x4 &nb= sp;           &nb= sp;   4
r11        =     0x76f82000       &= nbsp;  1995972608
r12       &= nbsp;    0xaf       &n= bsp;        175
sp  &nbs= p;          0x7ef92680 = ;         0x7ef92680
lr =             0x76a= dbc71          1991097457pc           &n= bsp; 0x76acd6b6          0x= 76acd6b6 <__libc_do_syscall+6>
cpsr    &nbs= p;      0x30      = ;          48
fpscr = ;         0x0   &= nbsp;           &= nbsp; 0
(gdb) disassem /r 0x76acd6b6,+8
Dump of assembler code fro= m 0x76acd6b6 to 0x76acd6be:
=3D> 0x76acd6b6 <__libc_do_syscall+= 6>:    80 bd   pop     {= r7, pc}
   0x76acd6b8 <__errno_location+0>: &nbs= p;   03 4b   ldr     r3, [pc, #1= 2]   ; (0x76acd6c8 <__errno_location+16>)
  = ; 0x76acd6ba <__errno_location+2>:     1d ee 7= 0 0f     mrc     15, 0, r0, cr13= , cr0, {3}
End of assembler dump.
(gdb)

--=_9fc0a916d0fe2740189b6e9b911d9ae0-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 27 17:24:26 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2020 21:24:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50140 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je3XG-0005oI-BH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:24:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je3XE-0005o3-Fd for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:24:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je3X8-0004Cs-DK for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:24:18 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37160 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1je3X7-00080Z-8y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:24:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 23:24:16 +0200 Message-Id: <874ks1hy0v.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #40737 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) severity 40737 important quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 17 18:36:40 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2020 22:36:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlgfg-0000aX-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:36:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlgfd-0000aJ-KB for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:36:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlgfY-0008PR-99; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:36:32 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=58818 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jlgfX-00076Q-Ob; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:36:32 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: dsmich@roadrunner.com Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch References: <3583c04a12981cebf9a014b71c2d6f1a27b851af@webmail> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:36:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3583c04a12981cebf9a014b71c2d6f1a27b851af@webmail> (dsmich@roadrunner.com's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:34:28 +0000") Message-ID: <87zh91nwup.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: 40737@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Dale, dsmich@roadrunner.com skribis: > Here is a backtrace of running guile on a builtroot constructed system > for rpi3. > Thumb2 instructions: BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=3Dy > Gcc 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION=3D"7.5.0" > Glibc. > > Uses the patch from > https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/merge_requests/3 > > I hope this makes it through the mail client ok.=20 > > -Dale > > Core was generated by `guile'. > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [...] > #0 0x76ee6f12 in scm_is_pair (x=3D0x0) at pairs.h:182 > #1 scm_sloppy_assq (key=3D0x752076f0, alist=3D0x0) at alist.c:59 > #2 0x76effef8 in scm_hash_fn_ref (table=3Dtable@entry=3D0x751da8b0, > obj=3Dobj@entry=3D0x752076f0, dflt=3Ddflt@entry=3D0x4, > hash_fn=3Dhash_fn@entry=3D0x76eff79d , assoc_fn=3D0x76ee6f0d , > closure=3Dclosure@entry=3D0x0) at hashtab.c:300 > #3 0x76efff5c in scm_hashq_ref (table=3D0x751da8b0, > key=3Dkey@entry=3D0x752076f0, dflt=3D0x4, dflt@entry=3D0x904) at hashtab.= c:426 > #4 0x76f11f74 in scm_module_variable (module=3D0x74f281e0, > sym=3D0x752076f0) at modules.c:500 > #5 0x76f430c4 in vm_debug_engine (thread=3D0x76a46e00) at > vm-engine.c:1560 Is this bug still present after the recent lightening merge in 3c3270491e78891e988af1b8007c6d8de9071a3c? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 18 09:49:46 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2020 13:49:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jluvK-0001yh-Er for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:49:46 -0400 Received: from p-impout002aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.133]:57037 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jluvF-0001yP-Mx for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:49:45 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id luv9jvql1v4w0luv9j146f; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:49:36 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=KaesTjQD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=Yn_N38yXIQDShd9jBFkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=7kCnHHfGwKojwe8DNmgA:9 a=Oh0tMjyWgGnpxlAF:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=PnVOTTmvsOeot2Fdb9eX:22 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 Message-Id: From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'=?UTF-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?='" X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:49:35 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_f86e5d52d35d2de1ac37001d83e1a740" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBBS7OWFh6Md+CFfOBdRTZj521aCMhE1AUvXCjZorjD/rMsRkweEnDdvj2+5mAG6zRwdr1jNW91BsLd/fknIwAGaCeiJlDsAuBeiZpZn8YNRpNOleh6s 7Q5p+la3Gxgpu+PJLnavmDX4bdLe6vbjXdQt/ziARuRyFKt2CVebsh8b5Tx/LzgBFuJHVVJ1/gtJqg== X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I'm still seeing segfaults on rasbian on an rpi3. Have not tried buildroot yet. That patch *did* fix a boatload of errors on arm, but this segfault is an unrelated problem I think. Only happens on arm though. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [47.43.26.133 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_f86e5d52d35d2de1ac37001d83e1a740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm still seeing segfaults on rasbian on an rpi3. Have not tried=0Abuild= root yet.=0A=0AThat patch *did* fix a boatload of errors on arm, but thi= s segfault is=0Aan unrelated problem I think. Only happens on arm though= .=0A=0AHere is a way to reproduce:=0A=0AIn the test-suite/standalone dir= :=0Awhile GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 make TESTS=3Dtest-language check-TESTS= ; do=0A:;done=0A=0AAnd then:=0A../../meta/uninstalled-env ../../libtool= --mode=3Dexecute gdb=0A../../libguile/guile core=0A=0AProgram terminate= d with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.=0A#0 0x76f505cc in scm_is_str= ing (x=3D0x0) at strings.h:293=0A293 return SCM_HAS_TYP7 (x, scm_tc7_str= ing);=0A[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x76fe6010 (LWP 21616))]=0A(gdb) bt= =0A#0 0x76f505cc in scm_is_string (x=3D0x0) at strings.h:293=0A#1 scm_st= ring_to_symbol (string=3D0x0) at symbols.c:361=0A#2 0x722df4cc in ?? ()= =0ABacktrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt=0A= stack?)=0A=0A=09-----------------------------------------From: "Ludovic= Court=C3=A8s" =0ATo: dsmich@roadrunner.com=0ACc: 40737@debbugs.gnu.org= =0ASent: Wednesday June 17 2020 6:36:34PM=0ASubject: Re: bug#40737: Segf= ault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with=0Aarm patch=0A=0AHi Dale,=0A=0A= dsmich@roadrunner.com skribis:=0A=0A > Here is a backtrace of running g= uile on a builtroot constructed=0A system=0A > for rpi3.=0A > Thumb2 ins= tructions: BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=3Dy=0A > Gcc 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION= =3D"7.5.0"=0A > Glibc.=0A >=0A > Uses the patch from=0A > --=_f86e5d52d35d2de1ac37001d83e1a740 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm still seeing segfaults on rasbian on an rpi3.  Have= not tried buildroot yet.

That patch *did* fix a boatload of erro= rs on arm, but this segfault is an unrelated problem I think.  Only= happens on arm though.

Here is a way to reproduce:

In the= test-suite/standalone dir:
while GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 make TESTS= =3Dtest-language check-TESTS; do :;done

And then:
../../meta/u= ninstalled-env ../../libtool --mode=3Dexecute gdb ../../libguile/guile c= ore

Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.#0  0x76f505cc in scm_is_string (x=3D0x0) at strings.h:293
293=        return SCM_HAS_TYP7 (x, scm_tc7_str= ing);
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x76fe6010 (LWP 21616))]
(gdb)= bt
#0  0x76f505cc in scm_is_string (x=3D0x0) at strings.h:293#1  scm_string_to_symbol (string=3D0x0) at symbols.c:361
#2&nb= sp; 0x722df4cc in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical t= o this frame (corrupt stack?)




-----------------------------------------

From:= "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s"
To: dsmich@roadrunner.com
C= c: 40737@debbugs.gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday June 17 2020 6:36:34PM
Su= bject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm pa= tch

Hi Dale,
=0A
=0A dsmich@roadrunner.com skribis:
=0A<= br>=0A > Here is a backtrace of running guile on a builtroot construc= ted
=0Asystem
=0A > for rpi3.
=0A > Thumb2 instructions:= BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2=3Dy
=0A > Gcc 7.5: BR2_GCC_VERSION=3D= "7.5.0"
=0A > Glibc.
=0A >
=0A > Uses the patch from=0A > --=_f86e5d52d35d2de1ac37001d83e1a740-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 18 10:54:32 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2020 14:54:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlvw0-0003la-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:54:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlvvy-0003lK-2J for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:54:31 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlvvr-0006Qo-PT; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:54:23 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=32920 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jlvvr-0008Nx-8s; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:54:23 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: dsmich@roadrunner.com Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 1 Messidor an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:54:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (dsmich@roadrunner.com's message of "Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:49:35 +0000") Message-ID: <877dw4jug2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, dsmich@roadrunner.com skribis: > I'm still seeing segfaults on rasbian on an rpi3. Have not tried > buildroot yet. > > That patch *did* fix a boatload of errors on arm, but this segfault is > an unrelated problem I think. Only happens on arm though. > > Here is a way to reproduce: > > In the test-suite/standalone dir: > while GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 make TESTS=3Dtest-language check-TESTS; do > :;done > > And then: > ../../meta/uninstalled-env ../../libtool --mode=3Dexecute gdb > ../../libguile/guile core > > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > #0 0x76f505cc in scm_is_string (x=3D0x0) at strings.h:293 > 293 return SCM_HAS_TYP7 (x, scm_tc7_string); > [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x76fe6010 (LWP 21616))] > (gdb) bt > #0 0x76f505cc in scm_is_string (x=3D0x0) at strings.h:293 > #1 scm_string_to_symbol (string=3D0x0) at symbols.c:361 > #2 0x722df4cc in ?? () > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt > stack?) OK. On IRC you mentioned that this does not happen with GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D-1, right? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 18 11:17:42 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2020 15:17:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlwIQ-0004ME-3K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:17:42 -0400 Received: from p-impout003aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.134]:56735 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlwIL-0004Lx-I2 for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:17:41 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id lwIFjZKiCyLuYlwIFjSX9v; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:17:31 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=K4pc4BeI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=YhqpkABJZr7UqGa2iXEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=g1Kf3WvJfSgA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=_-taUkkfuwPv9tAztLwA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=PnVOTTmvsOeot2Fdb9eX:22 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 Message-Id: <89343dd8d49b11614376fe595b4af8143417201f@webmail> From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'=?UTF-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?='" X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:17:30 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_7759787f8a59aeaef6359cbb212215d6" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfH2Ebpbp3ZYK0FC1LEslw0hOpLqBKDwU29T22U/bxpWjZ/8AVAznz+CvpB60LHkl2uky6mZ9Zh0Jh4Wm0KgJZyVTMxlBBXiaMGNaZ9v73elxOeiS4tHU mFQYILv6i4HsdqTSe77Pb6TT83KjDiz596ym1Hm3d+RDKlLv1UKne07vUFVXToy8DOYunN7RnvV6ug== X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: "Ludovic Courtès" > dsmich@roadrunner.com skribis: > > In the test-suite/standalone dir: > > while GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=0 make TESTS=test-language check-TESTS; > > OK. > > On IRC you mentioned t [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [47.43.26.134 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_7759787f8a59aeaef6359cbb212215d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" =0A> dsmich@roadrunner.com skribis:=0A > >= In the test-suite/standalone dir:=0A > > while GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0= make TESTS=3Dtest-language check-TESTS;=0A> =0A> OK.=0A > =0A > On IRC= you mentioned that this does not happen with=0AGUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D-1= , right?=0A >=0A=0AThat is correct.=0A=0A-Dale=0A=0A --=_7759787f8a59aeaef6359cbb212215d6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s"
> dsmich@r= oadrunner.com skribis:
=0A> > In the test-suite/standalone dir:=
=0A > > while GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D0 make TESTS=3Dtest-langua= ge check-TESTS;
>
> OK.
=0A>
=0A > On IRC you= mentioned that this does not happen with GUILE_JIT_THRESHOLD=3D-1, righ= t?
=0A>

That is correct.

-Dale

=0A --=_7759787f8a59aeaef6359cbb212215d6-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 19 12:07:39 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2020 16:07:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56679 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jmJYJ-000452-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:07:39 -0400 Received: from lungold.riddles.org.uk ([82.68.208.19]:12664) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jmJYH-00044t-EG for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:07:38 -0400 Received: from [192.168.127.1] (port=28388 helo=caithnard.riddles.org.uk) by lungold.riddles.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jmJYF-0000fX-24 for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:07:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53821 helo=caithnard.riddles.org.uk) by caithnard.riddles.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.93.0.4 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jmJYE-0000PK-Ts for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:07:35 +0000 From: Andrew Gierth To: 40737@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Message-ID: <87366r9h34.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:07:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Patch attached. -- Andrew. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=guile-arm.patch Content-Description: arm constant fix diff --git a/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c b/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c index 4445266af..2b4eecc29 100644 --- a/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c +++ b/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ encode_thumb_immediate(unsigned int v) return ((v & 0xff) | (1 << 12)); /* abcdefgh 00000000 abcdefgh 00000000 */ if (((v & 0xffff0000) >> 16) == (v & 0xffff) && (v & 0xff) == 0) - return ((v & 0x000000ff) | (2 << 12)); + return (((v & 0x0000ff00) >> 8) | (2 << 12)); /* abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh */ if ( (v & 0xff) == ((v & 0xff00) >> 8) && ((v & 0xff00) >> 8) == ((v & 0xff0000) >> 16) && --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 19 15:10:45 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2020 19:10:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jmMPV-00004s-IJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:10:45 -0400 Received: from p-impout010aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.141]:60585 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jmMPS-0008WJ-BX for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:10:44 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id mMPLjRNp6OQ8hmMPLjSLr1; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 19:10:36 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=SrXuF8G0 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=6Omw106BHXQhsn2DJPEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=iBhWLZKeAAAA:8 a=BUlG1OanY0Q6bFs5T2YA:9 a=xmjsTpsqWQbTo2Zz:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=A6JYFPPBVq9T8PoXqI0p:22 Message-Id: <3d5bd4ffc426b08c162d8c0c2e592360fe8e6ae9@webmail> From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'Andrew Gierth'" X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: RE: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 19:10:35 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_2735b514c3cecd5f54219549736069a7" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfF3YOXomyBbkaVk3vGPGTJtkYPma7S7LnTFpg9ReReD4wFS3hx038qD5IN04f5U+2tgD+j2aeaTgE1mUVbk+fjFmBIC/ics1KcZ0nlS+y81ohZpIfmkW DThhrJzAOj4xU+ewfneWbQtYikXPG/t1e2tF/wonB2cTzLVzKsG7cWxBnPwrLAFKb62hWE+DERSfolVtI8uCINOOEO822IO7GTM= X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here is the start of a case to go in tests/movi.c: #include "test.h" // Should really test all of the cases seen in // arm-cpu.c: encode_thumb_immediate() Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_2735b514c3cecd5f54219549736069a7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is the start of a case to go in tests/movi.c:=0A=0A#include "test.h= "=0A=0A// Should really test all of the cases seen in=0A// arm-cpu.c: en= code_thumb_immediate()=0A=0A/* 00000000 00000000 00000000 abcdefgh */=0A= /* 00000000 abcdefgh 00000000 abcdefgh */=0A/* abcdefgh 00000000 abcdefg= h 00000000 */=0A/* abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh */=0A/* 1bcdefgh --=_2735b514c3cecd5f54219549736069a7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is the start of a case to go in tests/movi.c:

#i= nclude "test.h"

// Should really test all of the cases seen in// arm-cpu.c: encode_thumb_immediate()

/* 00000000 00000000 0000= 0000 abcdefgh */
/* 00000000 abcdefgh 00000000 abcdefgh */
/* abcd= efgh 00000000 abcdefgh 00000000 */
/* abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh abcd= efgh */
/* 1bcdefgh << 24 ... 1bcdefgh << 1 */

sta= tic void
run_test(jit_state_t *j, uint8_t *arena_base, size_t arena_s= ize)
{
  jit_begin(j, arena_base, arena_size);
 
=   jit_movi(j, JIT_R0, 0xa500a500);
  jit_retr(j, JIT_R0);
  jit_uword_t (*f)(void) =3D jit_end(j, NULL);

 = fprintf(stderr, "returns 0x%08x\n", f());
  ASSERT(f() =3D=3D 0= xa500a500);
}

int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
&nb= sp; return main_helper(argc, argv, run_test);
}

=0A --=_2735b514c3cecd5f54219549736069a7-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 20 10:04:44 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2020 14:04:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jme6u-0002W1-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:04:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jme6q-0002Vn-Lv for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:04:42 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jme6h-0007wf-P9; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:04:31 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=41468 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jme6h-00050l-62; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:04:31 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Andrew Gierth Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch References: <3583c04a12981cebf9a014b71c2d6f1a27b851af@webmail> <87366r9h34.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:04:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87366r9h34.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> (Andrew Gierth's message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:07:34 +0100") Message-ID: <877dw1bzpv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: Andy Wingo , dsmich@roadrunner.com, 40737@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Andrew, Andrew Gierth skribis: > diff --git a/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c b/libguile/lighteni= ng/lightening/arm-cpu.c > index 4445266af..2b4eecc29 100644 > --- a/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c > +++ b/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c > @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ encode_thumb_immediate(unsigned int v) > return ((v & 0xff) | (1 << 12)); > /* abcdefgh 00000000 abcdefgh 00000000 */ > if (((v & 0xffff0000) >> 16) =3D=3D (v & 0xffff) && (v & 0xff) =3D=3D = 0) > - return ((v & 0x000000ff) | (2 << 12)); > + return (((v & 0x0000ff00) >> 8) | (2 << 12)); > /* abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh */ > if ( (v & 0xff) =3D=3D ((v & 0xff00) >> 8) && > ((v & 0xff00) >> 8) =3D=3D ((v & 0xff0000) >> 16) && I pushed this fix to the lightening repo on your behalf: https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/commit/1bb909a44d2303f88bb05125fc67= 42e97f80cd1d The CI jobs pass: https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/pipelines/158337465 I=E2=80=99ll try merging it into Guile, but do you have a test that reprodu= ces the original bug, either at the Guile level or in C using the lightening API? Perhaps the test that Dale posted yesterday at ? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #include "test.h"=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 static void=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 run_test(jit_state_t *j, uint8_t *arena_base, size_t arena_size) {=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 jit_begin(j, arena_base, arena_size);=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 jit_movi(j, JIT_R0, 0xa500a500);=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 jit_retr(j, JIT_R0);=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 jit_uword_t (*f)(void) =3D jit_end(j, NULL);=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 ASSERT(f() =3D=3D 0xa500a500);=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 }=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 int=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 main (int argc, char *argv[])=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 {=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 return main_helper(argc, argv, run_test);=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 }=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 20 10:38:10 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2020 14:38:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jmedG-0003Kk-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:38:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jmedE-0003KU-Ir for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:38:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmed8-0004Yj-2x; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:38:02 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=41682 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jmed7-0001Ii-M7; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:38:01 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Andrew Gierth Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch References: <3583c04a12981cebf9a014b71c2d6f1a27b851af@webmail> <87366r9h34.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> <877dw1bzpv.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:37:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877dw1bzpv.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:04:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87366pby60.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: Andy Wingo , dsmich@roadrunner.com, 40737@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > Andrew Gierth skribis: > >> diff --git a/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c b/libguile/lighten= ing/lightening/arm-cpu.c >> index 4445266af..2b4eecc29 100644 >> --- a/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c >> +++ b/libguile/lightening/lightening/arm-cpu.c >> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ encode_thumb_immediate(unsigned int v) >> return ((v & 0xff) | (1 << 12)); >> /* abcdefgh 00000000 abcdefgh 00000000 */ >> if (((v & 0xffff0000) >> 16) =3D=3D (v & 0xffff) && (v & 0xff) =3D=3D= 0) >> - return ((v & 0x000000ff) | (2 << 12)); >> + return (((v & 0x0000ff00) >> 8) | (2 << 12)); >> /* abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh */ >> if ( (v & 0xff) =3D=3D ((v & 0xff00) >> 8) && >> ((v & 0xff00) >> 8) =3D=3D ((v & 0xff0000) >> 16) && > > I pushed this fix to the lightening repo on your behalf: > > https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/commit/1bb909a44d2303f88bb05125fc= 6742e97f80cd1d > > The CI jobs pass: > > https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/pipelines/158337465 > > I=E2=80=99ll try merging it into Guile, but do you have a test that repro= duces > the original bug, either at the Guile level or in C using the lightening > API? Perhaps the test that Dale posted yesterday at > ? Replying to myself after our discussion on IRC: I=E2=80=99ve merged the tes= t you provided, Dale (with the addition of enter/leave_jit_abi), and pushed. https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/commit/24ef197b1269f8371b1f4a412caa= 6d2b99d66839 I=E2=80=99ll look into merging into Guile later today, and then I guess we = can close this bug. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 22 10:34:11 2020 Received: (at 40737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2020 14:34:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnNWV-0000qj-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:34:11 -0400 Received: from p-impout005aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.136]:37131 helo=p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnNWS-0000qW-G4 for 40737@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:34:09 -0400 Received: from localhost ([54.243.7.172]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id nNWLjyP1SWIhOnNWLjn9Am; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:34:02 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=SbSJicZu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:117 a=ZhHbwgLlxfPm5G22ibXkng==:17 a=dSg6v7tjMxUA:10 a=Foml57wWJ4Txkoi9hRQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=yYRRCDqi4DEA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 Message-Id: <78e69ea91256399129c1f52b9377877777393ab6@webmail> From: dsmich@roadrunner.com To: "'=?UTF-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?='" X-Mailer: Atmail X-Originating-IP: [65.185.85.154] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Subject: Re: bug#40737: Segfault in arm gcc7, thumb2 builroot, with arm patch Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:34:00 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_5bafa624e68a91cc0cad833c233d03f3" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFDJQZnBVjnXLZMexOnVIPewOnXM6snqNRIqBkbY5j2g3urT1XNk2auwdUnU8dn5NJiP5nguWaoPSwG2CMFJQDNSzwOnX8VCcmLko5xq2giDDlnHV84u EMSnRErGsYbm33QZ4Krfpqy6g75+8xdplyogQD3wm4BqpiRsaZEPhKB0EDIQ4Xfs46jf0g5akpbsnnO+66wMCW7ge2JhfPNrTvLfMx+h7MOAkVOA0yWuLUeC eYGNjq+rVK3KE0k9+bZV0g== X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 40737 v3.0.3 close 40737 v3.0.3 Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737 Cc: 'Andy Wingo' , 'Andrew Gierth' , "'40737@debbugs.gnu.org'" <40737@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --=_5bafa624e68a91cc0cad833c233d03f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable close 40737 v3.0.3=0A=0A --=_5bafa624e68a91cc0cad833c233d03f3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable close 40737 v3.0.3

=0A --=_5bafa624e68a91cc0cad833c233d03f3-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 22 11:18:21 2020 Received: (at 40737-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2020 15:18:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnODC-0001zK-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:18:21 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com ([209.85.167.182]:40345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnOD8-0001z6-Tl for 40737-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:18:16 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id t25so15923317oij.7 for <40737-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xLiAUrFPXSGMKdnwvIlFj7iYeHN9nvgvd124VWBfKPA=; b=LqW7IwEfOE7wUfHCttszga3qj6+lN5v6keohs1ZnzVHI/iYK+E8Xz4LzGFPMxyI2oD vuG9O/fRP9eBnlUgJPAWrT83T3Y/QGIs7IF5hZG2NzyJTgF3dpw6bX3L8wNuQ+A3Rc4i pn2zIoMXbFutbWTju1lU/6OaN/76lv9hEGPVt7sozHm5UYKR2obWU+hFsyxI6kAN/8y7 kcyaKgZNI0p8nQhKTe5IJbjhrKJK+WU3UOXe75EAPI/FRZvkcfBFnp8ULfEvgKR/n5q3 KbMKU653b3aM1fbzq+MX49VQ/hYBEOSdiDakaRqgUBQioe0T08fAy4xAp399TcDNeZoC G1mA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xLiAUrFPXSGMKdnwvIlFj7iYeHN9nvgvd124VWBfKPA=; b=CKzcoBy7fs+EgBVDZDT0QomidmGMgXJ8scN58P9ckx5ZHPEzL3FCd0vGH3X6JhBAsZ HQb2Xw/qVc85EmBk8ediqL89wgzvvcYIxv4SO9Nntg9OMfHOmQSZtZGm4Sj99zPX6MEg 93qEpT2oYPI2RcYMf4zVX07HGMu4CNW2RdFkhqmVDxCAl+odj/mtYyjgtR/0XyP/xACt gDkJoS32gt0uFHkX9mOzm4D5SHcvnTvSbD72H/Iu+bQXXs5xQ0cwAh3fqlLbon8NcAj4 gWpRVi8u1oMXzt/aPtQr8Xx+PrMZ7ojnHd5Bu3q6IXHEQGLD+FpuvBiTntddBsb7ZpAc Wo0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iT7Qz/7NlfG41nK04xjuWrgiCGjw0xoJoNhztSqbiPDo4/CA8 WBJExf1gj4/zpn9puVacMgRibMafFdO+aNb3ccNFZKzF X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsg1ZL7+6nd6bhcuZ38lG89DHdlrReHnJBM2HY4MZTNIYNsUzQ95lQBgAm4c+7DSxuDD7xOAmNtxc7CQYSmxw= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d58d:: with SMTP id m135mr12331428oig.102.1592839089017; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:18:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:3a22:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:18:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Dale Smith Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:18:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: 40737-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: 40737-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40737-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Fixed in the 3.0.3 release by commit 7e814190e From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:12:16 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator