GNU bug report logs - #40725
27.0.91; Tutorial reports false positive key rebindings

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 40725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
Cc: 40725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40725: 27.0.91; Tutorial reports false positive key rebindings
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:33:59 +0300

> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
> Cc: 40725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:26:53 +0100
> 
> > AFAIU from the code, the main consideration with C-c is when the user
> > turns on the CUA mode, not because it's a common prefix.  So maybe we
> > should narrow the test to only make sure CUA rebindings get caught?
> 
> Good point.  I hadn't thought of that and I'll look into it.

Thanks.

> >> > How do we distinguish the case where _all_ of the subcommands were
> >> > rebound, for example?
> >> 
> >> I don't think the current logic tries to handle that either, does it?
> >
> > Well, we are trying to improve the current logic, aren't we?
> 
> You drive a hard bargain. ;) I thought I'd suggest the current small
> patch before attacking tutorial.el wholesale, but I can do both in one
> go after the end of April when I'll have more free time.

It's fine to do it piecemeal.  But if you are not sure you will get to
that soon, perhaps leave some FIXME somewhere, so that we don't forget.

> While we're on the topic of improving the manual - it's on my todo to
> eventually help with a Greek and possibly even Hungarian translation.

You mean the tutorial, right?

> Is there anything more to it than posting a patch to
> bug-gnu-emacs/emacs-devel for review, such as getting a GNU translation
> team involved or anything like that?

No, I think posting it and letting people comment is good enough.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.