GNU bug report logs -
#40687
Missing right border on composed text used in 'display property
Previous Next
Full log
Message #11 received at 40687 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 17/04/2020 16.33, Stephen Berman wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:44:36 -0400 Clément Pit-Claudel <cpitclaudel <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the following sample code, I observe the results shown in the attached image. The first two "ab" have a border, but the last one only has three-quarters of its border: the right side is missing.
>>
>> (defface my-button
>> '((t :box(:line-width -4 :style released-button)
>> :background"lightgrey":foreground"black"))
>> "Button face")
>>
>> (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "button")
>> (insert "\n")
>> (insert (propertize "ab" 'face 'my-button))
>> (insert " ")
>> (insert (propertize (compose-chars ?a '(Br . Bl) ?b) 'face 'my-button))
>> (insert " ")
>> (insert (propertize "ab" 'display (compose-chars ?a '(Br . Bl) ?b) 'face 'my-button))
>> (insert " ")
>> (pop-to-buffer-same-window (current-buffer)))
>
> I see the same thing, but I noticed that when you add a space to
> composed characters of the display property, ie.:
> (compose-chars ?a '(Br . Bl) ?b ? )
> then right side border appears.
IIUC, this space is read as the number 32 and considered as the encoded version of the rule (tr . br). Indeed, this gives the same result:
(insert (propertize "ab" 'display (compose-chars ?a '(Bc . Bc) ?b '(tr . br)) 'face 'my-button))
But is that even a valid composition rule?It seems to break with non-trivial composition, like the following:
(insert (propertize "ab" 'display (compose-chars ?a '(Bc . Bc) ?b ? ) 'face 'my-button))
(instead of being stacked, a and b are side by side)
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 28 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.