GNU bug report logs - #40677
Jami

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Jan Wielkiewicz <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia <at> interia.pl>

Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:02:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #143 received at 40677 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia <at> interia.pl>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 40677 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#40677] [PATCH 23/30] gnu: pjproject, pjproject-jami:
 Remove broken pjproject package. Make pjproject-jami package stand-alone by
 moving package code from pjproject into it.
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:44:42 +0200

On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:03:42 +0200
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Why is pjproject package "broken"? Could pjproject-jami inherit from
> it and only change the suitable bits?
> 
> Mathieu

The pjproject package we had in Guix have never worked - the build
phase always failed. I attempted to fix it, but never successfully.
Jami is also the only package that uses pjproject, but a highly
modified version. I did some research about it and it seems pjproject
can't even be used as a system-wide library.

That's what I found:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02/msg00009.html


Jan Wielkiewicz
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 7 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.