Subject: Re: bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 21:49:08 +0300

On 05.05.2020 20:40, Drew Adams wrote:
> The word "destructive" is sufficiently strong.
> And in the case of the gotchas being discussed
> it's not necessarily even destructive
> modification.

It's not modification if it's not destructive. At least, in the context 
of the problem we're trying to describe.

Destructive modification, by itself, is a very regular occasion. Not 
something to warn against.