Subject: Re: bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:41:57 +0300

> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
>  [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
> From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:32:45 +0300
> 
> My point is, that program is using the same instrument as this one, 
> which *will* blow up at runtime.

No, it isn't the same instrument.  Your program constructs a function
call using address that has no valid instructions.  Paul's program
does nothing like that, it just attempts to write to a data address
which may or may not be in write-protected storage.  So your program
will always blow up, whereas the other one will only blow up if the
memory is write-protected.