From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:18:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40658: Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++ Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 40658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 40658@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Stefan Monnier X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.158704107627532 (code B ref -1); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:45:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 12:44:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3si-0007A0-79 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sg-00079s-I7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sf-0001T9-EF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sd-0008Tm-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:33 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:42849 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sd-0008Sa-EE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 24324 invoked by uid 3782); 16 Apr 2020 12:44:28 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p4FE15C1F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.31]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 5361 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Emacs. C++ comments can be continued onto the next line by an escaped NL. This is configured in Emacs with the variable comment-end-can-be-escaped. However, Fforward_comment (in the backward direction) doesn't take this into account. A BOL following an escaped NL cannot be at the end of a C++ line comment: // C++ comment first line \ Second line of comment ^ | point Point here is in the middle of a comment. It is therefore wrong in Fforward_comment not to check comment-end-can-be-escaped when immediately after an Sendcomment. This can be fixed thusly: diff --git a/src/syntax.c b/src/syntax.c index e24b98da32..ff125b137c 100644 --- a/src/syntax.c +++ b/src/syntax.c @@ -2572,8 +2572,9 @@ between them, return t; otherwise return nil. */) } else if (code == Sendcomment) { - found = back_comment (from, from_byte, stop, comnested, comstyle, - &out_charpos, &out_bytepos); + found = (!quoted || !Vcomment_end_can_be_escaped) + && back_comment (from, from_byte, stop, comnested, comstyle, + &out_charpos, &out_bytepos); if (!found) { if (c == '\n') This should clearly go into the master branch. I think it should also go into the emacs-27 release branch, since it is relevant for a nasty bug, bug #40052. There, scrolling in a C++ include file, which consists of a #define macro ~2,400 lines long is deadly slow. With the above fix in place, scrolling is over 4 times as fast, although still too slow. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:18:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40658: Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++ Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alan Mackenzie Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 40658@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 40658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40658.158704413832135 (code B ref 40658); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 40658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 13:35:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37747 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP4g5-0008MF-Lr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:35:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47289) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP4g3-0008M0-LT for 40658@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:35:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP4fx-0002hh-Vd; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:35:30 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3761 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jP4fx-00078q-7r; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:35:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:35:14 +0300 Message-Id: <83lfmveep9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 +0000) References: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 +0000 > From: Alan Mackenzie > Cc: Stefan Monnier > > This should clearly go into the master branch. I think it should also go > into the emacs-27 release branch, since it is relevant for a nasty bug, > bug #40052. Sorry, too late for that now. This code is there for the last 20+ years, we can endure that a bit more, I think. From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:18:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40658: Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++ Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 40658@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 40658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40658.158705816830997 (code B ref 40658); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 40658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 17:29:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39308 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8KO-00083t-6v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:29:28 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:22530 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8KM-00083e-Eu for 40658@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:29:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 43770 invoked by uid 3782); 16 Apr 2020 17:29:24 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p4FE15C1F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.31]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:29:23 +0200 Received: (qmail 8757 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Apr 2020 17:29:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:29:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20200416172923.GB5235@ACM> References: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> <83lfmveep9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83lfmveep9.fsf@gnu.org> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Eli. On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 16:35:14 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 +0000 > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > Cc: Stefan Monnier > > This should clearly go into the master branch. I think it should also go > > into the emacs-27 release branch, since it is relevant for a nasty bug, > > bug #40052. > Sorry, too late for that now. This code is there for the last 20+ > years, we can endure that a bit more, I think. OK, I've committed the patch to master. The code, in effect, just dates from 2015, when I added support for escaped EOLs in comments. I will put some workaround into CC Mode (which I would have to have done anyway). -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:18:14 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Alan Mackenzie Subject: bug#40658: closed (Re: bug#40658: (Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++)) Message-ID: References: <20200416173114.GC5235@ACM> <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 40658 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 40658@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:32:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1587058322-31364-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1587058322-31364-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #40658: Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++ which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 40658@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 40658: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D40658 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1587058322-31364-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 40658-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 17:31:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39316 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8MA-00088u-20 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:31:18 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:22544 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8M7-00088m-VZ for 40658-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:31:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 45675 invoked by uid 3782); 16 Apr 2020 17:31:15 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p4FE15C1F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.31]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:31:14 +0200 Received: (qmail 8775 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Apr 2020 17:31:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:31:14 +0000 To: 40658-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#40658: (Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++) Message-ID: <20200416173114.GC5235@ACM> References: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40658-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Bug fixed. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). ------------=_1587058322-31364-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 12:44:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3si-0007A0-79 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sg-00079s-I7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sf-0001T9-EF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sd-0008Tm-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:33 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:42849 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP3sd-0008Sa-EE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 24324 invoked by uid 3782); 16 Apr 2020 12:44:28 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p4FE15C1F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.31]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 5361 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:26 +0000 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++ Message-ID: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Emacs. C++ comments can be continued onto the next line by an escaped NL. This is configured in Emacs with the variable comment-end-can-be-escaped. However, Fforward_comment (in the backward direction) doesn't take this into account. A BOL following an escaped NL cannot be at the end of a C++ line comment: // C++ comment first line \ Second line of comment ^ | point Point here is in the middle of a comment. It is therefore wrong in Fforward_comment not to check comment-end-can-be-escaped when immediately after an Sendcomment. This can be fixed thusly: diff --git a/src/syntax.c b/src/syntax.c index e24b98da32..ff125b137c 100644 --- a/src/syntax.c +++ b/src/syntax.c @@ -2572,8 +2572,9 @@ between them, return t; otherwise return nil. */) } else if (code == Sendcomment) { - found = back_comment (from, from_byte, stop, comnested, comstyle, - &out_charpos, &out_bytepos); + found = (!quoted || !Vcomment_end_can_be_escaped) + && back_comment (from, from_byte, stop, comnested, comstyle, + &out_charpos, &out_bytepos); if (!found) { if (c == '\n') This should clearly go into the master branch. I think it should also go into the emacs-27 release branch, since it is relevant for a nasty bug, bug #40052. There, scrolling in a C++ include file, which consists of a #define macro ~2,400 lines long is deadly slow. With the above fix in place, scrolling is over 4 times as fast, although still too slow. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). ------------=_1587058322-31364-1-- From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:18:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40658: Fforward-comment: Incorrect recognition of end of comment in C++ Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alan Mackenzie Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 40658@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 40658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40658.15870600971994 (code B ref 40658); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 40658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 18:01:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8pU-0000W5-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:01:37 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:63359) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8pT-0000Vs-Mo for 40658@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:01:36 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 511601002FA; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:01:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B07EA100216; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:01:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1587060088; bh=drdQU/H4AfrT7y7vC+Ng4cHTJ+8UuISfB5hWE3O7XrY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WtF4Yu/HljGoTucXzbVYtXsCPqLXehS/UVS87rQ+RdwT8BQh7/AQVbzjS/jNw6ETA 2fIoKPH7u4FNPBr2f7w9kBOMwnd2C4KIMYOebiIBitj1euf1qLbnTpGOYvpr2KmsBy sT+uYYRn0dwoa6Z9N7c4WcjW0ua2vbd96OT66mZbYLvWuRool6HSs0n0jp7YU/tGqX BTn2zZDR7eZjyIyYDvj2c+2qQmU0CGwV6X2bCioI6hgyf9nimpSe147aWVJ9fSa5EG 6OpqeGuRVaqAAX43+lkFA8uGfD4ED3HUeJHFPgIKcsp9v8ltJE8nL/pwdglDLYaey5 VVfiRIod7yNNw== Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 065C01204F1; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:01:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier Message-ID: References: <20200416124426.GA5328@ACM> <83lfmveep9.fsf@gnu.org> <20200416172923.GB5235@ACM> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:01:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200416172923.GB5235@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:29:23 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.149 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > I will put some workaround into CC Mode Even better, thanks. > (which I would have to have done anyway). Well, there's no such obligation, really ;-) Stefan