GNU bug report logs - #40650
guix test suite failures building Debian package

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 40650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: 40650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40650: guix test suite failures building Debian package
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:50:31 +0200

Hi Vagrant,

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> skribis:

> On 2020-04-16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Any of the test suites that require networking will need to be disabled
>>> for Debian packages.
>>
>> That should be fine.
>
> Well, they need to be disabled even if networking is available...

Would it be an option for you to run:

  unshare -Un make check

or similar?

If not we would need to identify all the places that check for
networking and replace them with a constant.  For tests/*.scm, you can
change ‘network-reachable?’ to return #f.  For tests/*.sh, you have to
grep/sed for ‘getaddrinfo’.

>> Here’s it’s ‘search-bootstrap-binary’ from (guix tests) that tries to
>> create the file above, having downloaded it earlier.
>>
>> For the ‘guix’ package in Guix, what we do is that this and related
>> files are inputs to the package; that way, they are not downloaded at
>> all upon ‘make check’ since they’re already there.
>>
>> All you need is to ensure that
>> gnu/packages/bootstrap/*-linux/{bash,mkdir,tar,xz} exist, are
>> executable, and are statically-linked.  You could provide Debian
>> binaries if that’s more appropriate.
>
> Regarding providing Debian binaries, I could Build-Depend (the debian
> equivalent of "inputs") on bash-static and symlink to that, and maybe
> use busybox-static and symlinks for mkdir and tar, but I don't think
> there's a static implementation of xz in Debian.
>
> Do they strictly need to be statically linked? These are just for test
> suites, not actually used in the eventual packaged guix?

Actually no, it would also work with dynamically-linked binaries since
we’re not doing chroot builds.

So you could copy (not symlink) binaries from Debian, even simply those
that happen to be in /bin.

> I notice it's also checking for i686-linux/bash above even though the
> build was done on amd64/x86_64 ... and it would be non-trivial to enable
> cross-architecture checks for all architectures across all of Debian's
> architectures.

It’s simply that we use i686 binaries on x86_64.

At any rate, you’ll restrict the package to the subset of architectures
that Guix supports, right?

>> We may need to provide a dummy .gitconfig file or something here so we
>> can run these tests.  See also <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/37679>.
>> (The same applies to several test failures.)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I could try a couple things ... basically re-implement the patch from
> #37679 in Debian's packaging (e.g. HOME=/some/path and populate
> $HOME/.gitconfig), or apply the patch and try it. :)

Yeah, let’s do something about it.  :-)

>>> test-name: scandir*, properties
>>> location: /build/guix-jgTHmh/guix-1.1.0/tests/syscalls.scm:257
>>> source:
>>> + (test-assert
>>> +   "scandir*, properties"
>>> +   (let ((directory
>>> +           (dirname
>>> +             (search-path %load-path "guix/base32.scm"))))
>>> +     (every (lambda (entry name)
>>> +              (match entry
>>> +                     ((name2 . properties)
>>> +                      (and (string=? name2 name)
>>> +                           (let* ((full (string-append directory "/" name))
>>> +                                  (stat (lstat full))
>>> +                                  (inode (assoc-ref properties 'inode))
>>> +                                  (type (assoc-ref properties 'type)))
>>> +                             (and (= inode (stat:ino stat))
>>> +                                  (or (eq? type 'unknown)
>>> +                                      (eq? type (stat:type stat)))))))))
>>> +            (scandir* directory)
>>> +            (scandir directory (const #t) string<?))))
>>> actual-value: #f
>>> result: FAIL
>>
>> Could you wrap the ‘scandir*’ and ‘scandir’ calls in ‘pk’, run:
>
> like this?
>                 (pk (scandir* directory))
>                 (pk (scandir directory (const #t) string<?)))))

Yes.

>>   make check TESTS=tests/syscalls.scm
>>
>> and send ‘test-suite.log’?
>
> It's a bit expensive for me to do a build for just this test, but I can
> patch it and it should still get included in the full test-suite.log,
> yes?

Yes.

> I guess it might make sense to do a build from a chroot manually to
> debug some of these test suite issues, but I usually just do a full
> package build to make sure I didn't manually tweak something without
> remembering what it was later...

Perhaps it’s reproducible in a “regular” Debian environment?

>>> ++ guix build guile-gcrypt --with-branch=guile-gcrypt=master -d
>>> accepted connection from pid 17231, user vagrant
>>> updating checkout of 'https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git'...
>>> guix build: error: cannot fetch branch 'master' from https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git: the SSL certificate is invalid: 0x08 - The certificate is not correctly signed by the trusted CA
>>> + latest_drv=
>>> FAIL tests/guix-build-branch.sh (exit status: 1)
>>
>> This test relies on network access + HTTPS certificates.  It does check
>> for the former but not the latter.  Any suggestions on how to do that?
>
> This might be a candidate for "autopackagetests" described earlier.
>
> Alternately/Additionally, ship or create a git repository from the
> source tree, run git daemon on a random free port, and try it there.

Uh, that would be better… I’d gladly accept patches.  :-)

Thanks for your feedback!  Hopefully we can easily address the remaining issues.

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.