GNU bug report logs - #40597
[PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40597: closed ([PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in
 guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions.)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 03:20:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:19:14 -0400
with message-id <87pmvlpop9.fsf_-_ <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#40597: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40597,
regarding [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
40597: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40597
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball,
 rebuild instructions.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:34:38 +0200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

following the discussion in guix-devel, here is a small doc
addition to explain how binary-tarball modifications can
be built and then tested...

WDYT ?

-- 
Vincent Legoll

[0001-doc-Mention-update-guix-package-in-guix-binary-tarba.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>, 40597-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40597: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in
 guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions.
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:19:14 -0400

Hi Vincent and Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Vincent,
>
> Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>>>From dd961656d9bd98d11ba5e38be89cd1952fefc263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:25:57 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball
>>  rebuild instructions.
>>
>> * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package'.
>
> I agree this needs to be documented, but I don’t think this is the right
> place: “Binary Installation” is for users who want to install.  Instead,
> we should document it in a section explicitly targeting Guix developers,
> maybe under “Contributing”?

A "Updating the Guix Package" subsection has since been added to the
Contributing section, which I believe covers this.

Thank you,

Closing.

Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.