From unknown Mon Jun 23 05:59:23 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#40597 <40597@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#40597 <40597@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions. Reply-To: bug#40597 <40597@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:59:23 +0000 retitle 40597 [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarba= ll, rebuild instructions. reassign 40597 guix-patches submitter 40597 Vincent Legoll severity 40597 normal tag 40597 patch moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 13 08:34:49 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2020 12:34:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59344 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNyIa-0005Cg-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:34:49 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54101) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNyIZ-0005CZ-1R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:34:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNyIW-0006dp-CD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:34:45 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNyIU-0008Gj-JX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:34:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]:33196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNyIU-0008GL-8O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:34:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id v8so10024289wma.0 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 05:34:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language; bh=imiV69mogbvcyGMyxfy3Eh703f/zGRXwSHzi6xiF1kQ=; b=m9eCBJX0O9zaTM//rKaVA75f774lQtV1Ce3fAreKcdghkiJ2werEZ4m+rg8aAJx225 zDp0v4UfcuklcIMINT2N4ukbDnx+STOuAfaB80OpMGKHIlLc+wQjXOdURfGw2fhbKRs3 IMc5Ux/CsvgLX4smS3v9vsFD8PMtdeb1eNDlFMpTXEh3SLNV0YdGekU9O+s1sCojTqn4 xOLDckoe13Qr30eEOTJI8WAkYktGCooIFEoF/zK+twF1yLNh9Kn/SU8h1qKdUPJbtI9q 23cJa6IaHxG5EN0Wn2snD8aDlsCr7FtTggX4NzDmDcEHiyJu6zurqDPQ0Gu5/DQArOwr Lnww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language; bh=imiV69mogbvcyGMyxfy3Eh703f/zGRXwSHzi6xiF1kQ=; b=H0P766DSdzL2EjTVh3Y2ttNomOygcghXEeO2auTRKG+6qSzFJebIJaGmGbY7BoG0rk +XUolvhA4W7txZv2qvcJ5yRg+S6wCeFPf8JiJktJCOe3eEEvnYxHHDNbLDbVWTAQaP6T D5m6otRKXKnQ4vUAr1WKGelApg/9b2aqnwcuINklItnB/PHAs86RL4YBjdGMNtgHw3E+ MpGJB9Abj65+P/45DtgU14JK0PhcgQ1djybv4mZv6IUIW8Vgf9w9s/udHCVvLN5BQCh7 xDTXLVNPJSRkqmasgglR6SbHNmMbrrJKPuNBaJuatyXPafTxGEVxUwfWZvSZaHKc+YvP ZCGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZTZVu3lAl1bU1yGcpxCBssHx03tgNsyaUVeftBYvEoZ3mZDB/a 3iNHS7fsLGG4IOtc04HSPqGDJiDZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJbbNS6xdvS6KmfAnVly9oI7KBufvMYjm3G3ZH208CxcF3u5v2ukjna9ZQh9ouJq5ImHmX2+w== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c14b:: with SMTP id z11mr3399715wmi.44.1586781280822; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 05:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (se167-1-82-242-148-1.fbx.proxad.net. [82.242.148.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e1sm3728261wrc.12.2020.04.13.05.34.39 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 05:34:39 -0700 (PDT) To: guix-patches@gnu.org From: Vincent Legoll Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions. Message-ID: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:34:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7AE309F5C52C4E49FDB5101A" Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::335 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, following the discussion in guix-devel, here is a small doc addition to explain how binary-tarball modifications can be built and then tested... WDYT ? Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (vincent.legoll[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------7AE309F5C52C4E49FDB5101A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, following the discussion in guix-devel, here is a small doc addition to explain how binary-tarball modifications can be built and then tested... WDYT ? -- Vincent Legoll --------------7AE309F5C52C4E49FDB5101A Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name="0001-doc-Mention-update-guix-package-in-guix-binary-tarba.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="0001-doc-Mention-update-guix-package-in-guix-binary-tarba.pa"; filename*1="tch" >From dd961656d9bd98d11ba5e38be89cd1952fefc263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent Legoll Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:25:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball rebuild instructions. * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package'. --- doc/guix.texi | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 891e2693f6..8bf4ef9b74 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ Copyright @copyright{} 2020 Jakub Kądziołka@* Copyright @copyright{} 2020 Jack Hill@* Copyright @copyright{} 2020 Naga Malleswari@* Copyright @copyright{} 2020 Brice Waegeneire@* +Copyright @copyright{} 2020 Vincent Legoll@* Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or @@ -736,6 +737,16 @@ guix pack -s @var{system} --localstatedir \ @xref{Invoking guix pack}, for more info on this handy tool. +If you have local modifications you want to include in the resulting +tarball, you have to run the following command in your modified Guix +source tree before doing the above: + +@example +make update-guix-package +git commit -m'NOT_FOR_UPSTREAM:allow testing a modified guix-binary' \ + gnu/packages/package-management.scm +@end example + @node Requirements @section Requirements -- 2.20.1 --------------7AE309F5C52C4E49FDB5101A-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 13 09:41:22 2020 Received: (at 40597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2020 13:41:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzL0-0000Se-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:41:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzKy-0000SP-9o for 40597@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:41:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzKt-00083H-10; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:41:15 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=44318 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzKs-0007uV-DA; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:41:14 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: [bug#40597] [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions. References: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:41:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> (Vincent Legoll's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:34:38 +0200") Message-ID: <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40597 Cc: 40597@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Vincent, Vincent Legoll skribis: >>>From dd961656d9bd98d11ba5e38be89cd1952fefc263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vincent Legoll > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:25:57 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball > rebuild instructions. > > * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package'. I agree this needs to be documented, but I don=E2=80=99t think this is the = right place: =E2=80=9CBinary Installation=E2=80=9D is for users who want to insta= ll. Instead, we should document it in a section explicitly targeting Guix developers, maybe under =E2=80=9CContributing=E2=80=9D? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 13 09:43:44 2020 Received: (at 40597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2020 13:43:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzNI-0000WK-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:43:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:42824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNzNG-0000W7-5Q for 40597@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:43:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j2so10181595wrs.9 for <40597@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 06:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=GQcDUDrRfAsUkzDhd3Gx8pG63bcRcXRBiX0P2PWdFoQ=; b=YML7GWbfjjj71dvirRwkIB8CygfEjp+B5BnO6ypfjyLr38XpYrs+6pCeECAcgRJaiY 9wQDyvV7lzWGqktqNDX8qHqYw+cemyJXfkMvtPVy1NubsTsLXPxDqyYTKAL1x7rzowXG /h4qM9k/PSo28OFNpEQBFBjw9WlYc5uEBOWaqE69qfVPid882PKA/3FsYd0SNagOGRma xvJ5aQ0MECaKoNXQuZ/FF2QPijJipLWaNPu4G69sBBHKOlZj9fcY4Hc7bJYNArrNV6bv +G2Wb8tyYxy4LHRKLbToHHsSOI18yaG0So2BC2h4V7xUuiE0Qi9Q7mw64cX93DlBx71A NcCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=GQcDUDrRfAsUkzDhd3Gx8pG63bcRcXRBiX0P2PWdFoQ=; b=e136a9dIaJz3hhi3in57/Nig5PI8YVdAEL3Zy5o+UcKu2xphNkZX7JkZ33GgLo/7Ti DzMzgqLaG7SiCfwIsCXaau0d0wH5hfXmkp+CoDfUvtNmahu9b/rDbfCFDXX2hHlqjAAK LL6y1UJBZ3YzxfAeJq7HlTD3MEjYiBRtlvZ16kD4Cr0Np8yGaM2b3ShfVQrFqELQHjD6 k8popNmgphBmJaSdoENUrCgrIk4Ii/wKnwCCP0i2ke2b+J7RKboLQif0vKOaAHAo3bN1 ifqPq4JS9RuF6qQRSrwA482VGzc057jEJvxVNVurbx7q5dNqhywaQTPRrLSLT8KYGi+R AbCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaF+PdvcH49frJWHBVUwMjIx/cFUuKFOleP90cxkvSas/mFqev1 eBKtWPy6JLzoyysnw+j8RFacGdaR X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL78GK8bAieQqezrQvLItx9Rkt9fCbPjaIteXrhAJmM/PmHS5UuW1ZwVdSqYVlZYVVvxQYq1A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc92:: with SMTP id g18mr9568414wrr.10.1586785416017; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 06:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (se167-1-82-242-148-1.fbx.proxad.net. [82.242.148.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm15113236wrs.81.2020.04.13.06.43.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 06:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [bug#40597] [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= References: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Vincent Legoll Message-ID: <91ebc21a-2d35-a51d-c474-799d12db2cca@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:43:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40597 Cc: 40597@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) On 13/04/2020 15:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Vincent Legoll skribis: > >> * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package'. > I agree this needs to be documented, but I don’t think this is the right > place: “Binary Installation” is for users who want to install. Instead, > we should document it in a section explicitly targeting Guix developers, > maybe under “Contributing”? OK, I'll see what I can do. -- Vincent Legoll From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 25 16:15:04 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2020 20:15:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdJV1-0001r7-PR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 16:15:04 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:37592) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdJV0-0001o9-1k for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 16:15:02 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,434,1583190000"; d="scan'208";a="349576170" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 May 2020 22:14:56 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 22:14:56 +0200 Message-Id: <875zcjvkjj.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #40597 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 40597 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 23:19:24 2021 Received: (at 40597-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2021 03:19:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3VQi-0007wK-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:19:24 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com ([209.85.160.181]:45635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3VQf-0007w4-9G for 40597-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:19:23 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id z25so859606qto.12 for <40597-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sSWrGkTKDCWzaxmC2nZP5m55dL6y2B9EY9fpqbFjN1k=; b=GgDalSxrM10n5j1ejhFg3sRXN/tNdHt2JgDOXzyeWk8QkeQvta5WybJElPflPvrwW6 ttCVCWs5VYtmLnVsWX/3ES2TinurcjftCu6u+DrB4wyp1Ctv6qVr77MBDrIB4OIvRA3X kwv8bPdDW9YWmJDji3Y0SY7JhEulfMXWjELUGcKcM6Nr2gCAPGzFwfTVwopfDfFWdDK6 gPAf44o/oOpbMQiaS3M5kvY0jgfFYQGbK2r97/p6AY0aVzukODy9VPZgfJWWEdqUKJ3l ZIPf2dx7Ew7cEg40BelOeoD4wlmmV9kVrWNttSWRBamkUZMNZStr6m5anSnDeweRSBUV uBmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sSWrGkTKDCWzaxmC2nZP5m55dL6y2B9EY9fpqbFjN1k=; b=sdezAinbezXhvX2rG+Cdqqjxu6Ya4FYm1k0FVy7+a0wDbjmyED8iLFw4H7cBO6lAMp jlqHTqFY+Z766V43BkHNXDTJ/GEHeuQv6rDOwSnCqw0yo5n+0BtTw/+h+H35gFcA9xBq 3/YKPkaDU1N0WCTp3/OQWftv93v/peFPtJQiUAKUpYfWtv+a02OZvrfHzS9c3wIfrsvs GrE3k58pboyhBeswwy4knzE5vOpXbWcwiTBajk0V9vYjbaGY9cYucakTdhm8FH0S7Gtj 23NZh/vf7NxZkWFwbpCSw2ubgZ3es7Qnyx/bPDjaHaaWqg96b4VkRD7K5+zh1lJCeraj TdiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530aHmbAglLX9HSyJ+KsLVx453apAGymIJpduwKR+bIjY6h2TXJn ooflBdmGQKPey5Ak2r88xaAcMFUpSUBNHz1s X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTm0Y9PXAaA2XDENuhVnYXhHdaB8a1yStQyWdhSNq7KYH3Ie/5XibLbXlSFXqb4A+ogBs8bw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:24e:: with SMTP id c14mr7339147qtx.85.1626232755722; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-136-19.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.136.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b25sm419179qka.123.2021.07.13.20.19.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:19:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#40597: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball, rebuild instructions. References: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:19:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:41:12 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmvlpop9.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40597-done Cc: Vincent Legoll , 40597-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Vincent and Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Vincent, > > Vincent Legoll skribis: > >>>>>From dd961656d9bd98d11ba5e38be89cd1952fefc263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Vincent Legoll >> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:25:57 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball >> rebuild instructions. >> >> * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package= '. > > I agree this needs to be documented, but I don=E2=80=99t think this is th= e right > place: =E2=80=9CBinary Installation=E2=80=9D is for users who want to ins= tall. Instead, > we should document it in a section explicitly targeting Guix developers, > maybe under =E2=80=9CContributing=E2=80=9D? A "Updating the Guix Package" subsection has since been added to the Contributing section, which I believe covers this. Thank you, Closing. Maxim From unknown Mon Jun 23 05:59:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:24:14 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator