GNU bug report logs - #40573
27.0.90; flymake-mode broken in scratch buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.0.90

Done: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #80 received at 40573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 40573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>,
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#40573: 27.0.90; flymake-mode broken in scratch buffer
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:21:50 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:13 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

>
> > Shouldn't we just take a "best-effort" approach here?
>
> I think you will find that opinions differ on what is "best effort" in
> this context.  Which is completely fine, we don't need to agree on
> such issues.
>

Indeed, we don't need to, but here's my take on anyway,
followed by a question.

For me, best effort here means: do something self-contained
that brings some good and brings no harm.  I think introducing
lisp-data-mode is _exactly_ in those conditions.

That's not to say we can't use do _more_ good as we
extend our efforts. But we shouldn't let those ambitions
stifle the initial deed, smaller, but unquestionably positive.

So I'm thinking of introducing lisp-data-mode later on in
master, following Stefan's patch. And using it only for `dir-locals.el`
for now (and for my own files of course).

Is that OK with you?


-- 
João Távora
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 25 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.