GNU bug report logs - #40573
27.0.90; flymake-mode broken in scratch buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 40573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: bug#40573: 27.0.90; flymake-mode broken in scratch buffer
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:07:15 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:49 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  joaotavora <at> gmail.com,
> >   40573 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dgutov <at> yandex.ru
> > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:06:51 -0400
> >
> > > Each package could add its data file name to auto-mode-alist.
> > > For example, bookmark.el could do something like:
> > >
> > >   (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist (cons bookmark-default-file
> 'emacs-lisp-data-mode))
> >
> > For generated files, it's probably better to add a -*- cookie in
> > the file.
>
> Right.  But some modes define an init file that users need to create
> and maintain.
>

Right.  But:

1. do we have a starting idea of which of those are mode-generated
and which of those are user-generated? And which can be either?

2. do we need to decide on this, admittedly nice-to-have behaviour,
before introducing the new major mode?  Shouldn't we just take a
"best-effort" approach here?

João


-- 
João Távora

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.