Subject: bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:53:25 +0900

> At least the question “is texlive-amsfonts broken” is definitively
> answered.  This was what this issue was about, no?  I’d rather keep the
> other issue separate.

Well, it's still broken in the sense that we're not able to typeset with
eufm10, no? That said, I guess it could make sense to define this issue as
"tlpdb non-conformance problems" and close as fixed.