GNU bug report logs - #40549
[usability] revert last generation

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Tom Zander <tomz <at> freedommail.ch>

Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:25:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tom Zander <tomz <at> freedommail.ch>
Subject: bug#40549: closed (Re: bug#40549: [usability] revert last generation)
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:50:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#40549: [usability] revert last generation

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 40549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
40549: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40549
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Tom Zander <tomz <at> freedommail.ch>
Cc: 40549-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40549: [usability] revert last generation
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:49:13 +0200
Hi,

Thanks for the report.  Because you reported 2 issues:

  a) one about the order of ’%actions’ processing
  b) one about short-name with optional argument

I prefer to close this bug and track the issues into 2 separated
numbers, i.e.,

  a) see #50472 <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/50472>
  b) see #50473 <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/50473>

because it eases the actionable steps to fix them.


All the best,
simon

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Tom Zander <tomz <at> freedommail.ch>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [usability] revert last generation
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:23:52 +0200
This could be nicer:

I just installed something and want to revert this last generation, as seen in 
`guix package -l`.

Doing a single call like `guix package -S 17 -d 18`   does not work, and I'd 
like it to work.

What it does is that it notices I'm currently on generation 18 and thus it 
can't delete that one. As such it just errors out and returns.

What I expect to happen (regardless of order of arguments) is that it switches 
to the 17th generation and then deletes generation 18.

-- 
Tom Zander





This bug report was last modified 3 years and 259 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.