GNU bug report logs -
#40525
inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) failed
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2020 17:53:17 +0100
with message-id <877dyc68hu.fsf <at> cbaines.net>
and subject line Re: bug#40525: inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) failed
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40525,
regarding inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) failed
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
40525: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40525
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hey,
The Guix Data Service seems to be having trouble processing the
core-updates branch [1]
1: https://guix-patches-data.cbaines.net/repository/2/branch/core-updates
At some point, usually when extracting the information about lint
warnings, package derivations or system tests, the inferior guix repl
crashes.
Looking at some strace output (attached), a mmap system call fails with
ENOMEM, however I don't think my system was out of memory or that the
process was even using that much memory at the time.
I'm not trying to use the Guix Data Service much with the core-updates
branch, but I wouldn't want this issue to break the data at
data.guix.gnu.org once the core-updates changes are merged.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Chris
[guix-inferior-strace (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Glad you manage to get more info.
>>
>> Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
>>
>>> Following up on this, I've built Guile on core-updates with libgc <at> 7
>>> rather than libgc <at> 8 (which is what's used above), and I can't reproduce
>>> the issue. So, I'm getting more certain that this is a regression which
>>> the libgc upgrade has led to.
>>
>> Bah. :-/
>>
>> We noticed similar issues with libgc <at> 8 earlier but it seemed to be
>> fixed:
>>
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36812
>>
>>> Would it be feasible to keep guile, or at least the guile Guix uses with
>>> libgc <at> 7 for now?
>>
>> Yes, we can define a Guile variant in (gnu packages guile) and have
>> (guix self) refer to it.
>
> I've sent a patch which I think does this now [1]. Assuming I've done
> the right thing, is this something that can be merged in to core-updates
> Marius?
>
> 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40684
>
> I've tested the patch by running:
>
> ./pre-inst-env guile build-aux/compile-as-derivation.scm "$PWD"
>
> Then taking the Guix I get, and trying the script to reproduce the issue
> through the guix repl, and it seems to work.
I've merged the fix [1] in now, and it looks to have worked [2].
1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40684
2: https://guix-patches-data.cbaines.net/revision/cef392f3936922b7b0b74bd59be67e660c10db67
Thanks for your help in resolving this Ludo!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 11 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.