From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 03:08:01 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 07:08:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzNx-0002FT-5R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:08:01 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzNv-0002FG-9N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:07:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52501) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzNu-00063g-6L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:07:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzNs-0006sd-9B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:07:57 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:48780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzNr-0006pj-RD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:07:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739BD2E9CE for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:07:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MF8hKq9TMMNl for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:07:52 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586070472; bh=zRvgyWszmoSMUkMIR++hpzqDht5kSWnz0p7kVu0y/dc=; h=Date:From:Subject:To; b=XPS2o2CTwOfFPaWh0G8kq3S9M3ivea9XTKNnBzWihpoh8w+CuXRLtJkN2hmlcFrUn E6KpWv1+bNneilktuUebG468mLY/e/thNgewC1ezhfLEKWNk0rbw86ybSmxADe6kiB wBPtLOWax4LE4MMaLi16V75l+z1vEj5WEwSAG0e6y117MIPnkX9i2brrsa/4TiL3V5 MAgbL/d+EoZDmHLu8M5t901+HpTci0GPYb1HICuEXmfnyH7kUSMNmJqktV3y0K9kmW joNs2678s949Wmpb7ZPfGwGqD5SYih1hG1XaKRrqi4n0DBptY/1ZCYCDfSHS/FCO87 hsgJY2eaYiobg== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 07:07:51 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--=_RainLoop_534_492370147.1586070471" From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> Subject: gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: guix-patches@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 178.21.23.139 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) ----=_RainLoop_534_492370147.1586070471 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----=_RainLoop_534_492370147.1586070471 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="update-gsm.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="update-gsm.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RnJvbSA2MmRmZWI1ZDgwMTc2MmNlNTgyNGQwM2UxNTQ3MGVkM2VkNmNlMmMyIE1vbiBTZXAg MTcgMDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBSYWdoYXYgR3VydXJhamFuIDxyYWdoYXZndXJ1cmFq YW5AZGlzcm9vdC5vcmc+CkRhdGU6IFN1biwgNSBBcHIgMjAyMCAwMzowNDozMiAtMDQwMApT dWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIGdudTogZ3NtOiBVcGRhdGUgdG8gMS4wLjE5LgoKKiBnbnUvcGFj a2FnZXMvYXVkaW8uc2NtIChnc20pOiBVcGRhdGUgdG8gMS4wLjE5LgotLS0KIGdudS9wYWNr YWdlcy9hdWRpby5zY20gfCAxNCArKysrKysrKystLS0tLQogMSBmaWxlIGNoYW5nZWQsIDkg aW5zZXJ0aW9ucygrKSwgNSBkZWxldGlvbnMoLSkKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9nbnUvcGFja2Fn ZXMvYXVkaW8uc2NtIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL2F1ZGlvLnNjbQppbmRleCA2ZDI5MTg0NTky Li5lOGQ0OGY0OWQwIDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9nbnUvcGFja2FnZXMvYXVkaW8uc2NtCisrKyBi L2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9hdWRpby5zY20KQEAgLTMzNDMsNyArMzM0Myw3IEBAIGNvZGUsIHVz ZWQgaW4gQGNvZGV7bGlidG94Y29yZX0uIikKIChkZWZpbmUtcHVibGljIGdzbQogICAocGFj a2FnZQogICAgIChuYW1lICJnc20iKQotICAgICh2ZXJzaW9uICIxLjAuMTgiKQorICAgICh2 ZXJzaW9uICIxLjAuMTkiKQogICAgIChzb3VyY2UKICAgICAgKG9yaWdpbgogICAgICAgICht ZXRob2QgdXJsLWZldGNoKQpAQCAtMzM1MiwxOCArMzM1MiwyMiBAQCBjb2RlLCB1c2VkIGlu IEBjb2Rle2xpYnRveGNvcmV9LiIpCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICItIiB2ZXJz aW9uICIudGFyLmd6IikpCiAgICAgICAgKHNoYTI1NgogICAgICAgICAoYmFzZTMyCi0gICAg ICAgICAiMDQxYW12cHo4Y3Z4eWtsM3B3cWxkcnp4bGlnbW16Y2c4bmNkbnhiZzMycmxxZjNx MXhoNCIpKSkpCisgICAgICAgICAiMXhraGE5c3M1ZzVxbmZheWJpOGlsMG1jdnA4a253Zzlw bGdoODQwNHZoNThkMHBuYTBzOSIpKSkpCiAgICAgKGJ1aWxkLXN5c3RlbSBnbnUtYnVpbGQt c3lzdGVtKQogICAgIChhcmd1bWVudHMKICAgICAgYCgjOnRlc3QtdGFyZ2V0ICJ0c3QiCi0g ICAgICAgIzptYWtlLWZsYWdzICcoIklOU1RBTExfUk9PVD0lb3V0cHV0IgotICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICJDQ0ZMQUdTPS1mUElDIFwKLS1jIC1PMiAtRE5lZWRGdW5jdGlvblBy b3RvdHlwZXM9MSAtV2FsbCAtV25vLWNvbW1lbnQiKSA7ZGVmYXVsdCBvcHRpb25zCisgICAg ICAgIzptYWtlLWZsYWdzCisgICAgICAgKGxpc3QKKyAgICAgICAgOzsgQWRkZWQgLWZQSUMg d2l0aCBvdGhlciBkZWZhdWx0IG9wdGlvbnMuCisgICAgICAgICJDQ0ZMQUdTPS1mUElDIC1j IC1PMiAtRE5lZWRGdW5jdGlvblByb3RvdHlwZXM9MSAtV2FsbCAtV25vLWNvbW1lbnQiKQog ICAgICAgICM6cGhhc2VzCiAgICAgICAgKG1vZGlmeS1waGFzZXMgJXN0YW5kYXJkLXBoYXNl cwogICAgICAgICAgKGFkZC1iZWZvcmUgJ2luc3RhbGwgJ3ByZS1pbnN0YWxsCiAgICAgICAg ICAgIChsYW1iZGEgXwogICAgICAgICAgICAgIChsZXQgKChvdXQgKGFzc29jLXJlZiAlb3V0 cHV0cyAib3V0IikpKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKHN1YnN0aXR1dGUqICJNYWtlZmlsZSIK KyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKCgiSU5TVEFMTF9ST09UXHQ9IikKKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIChzdHJpbmctYXBwZW5kICJJTlNUQUxMX1JPT1RcdD1cdCIgb3V0KSkpCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAobWtkaXItcCAoc3RyaW5nLWFwcGVuZCBvdXQgIi9pbmMiKSkKICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIChta2Rpci1wIChzdHJpbmctYXBwZW5kIG91dCAiL21hbiIpKQogICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgKG1rZGlyLXAgKHN0cmluZy1hcHBlbmQgb3V0ICIvbWFuL21hbjEiKSkKLS0gCjIu MjYuMAoK ----=_RainLoop_534_492370147.1586070471-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 03:10:02 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 07:10:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzPt-0002Mh-KS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:10:01 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:55748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKzPs-0002MQ-0A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:10:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5162CD62 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:09:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvX1K6FzhWm0 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 09:09:58 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586070598; bh=LtFS6fT8kS5IiIPxclo3nd+8Ik4Aw1wawqzymR5cOTo=; h=Date:From:Subject:To; b=jP9QbNIoc1LoTMUYhPGA/je9BrMwpY2RzhePkuyhfjPcuR01SRghFCtzJRkS0VGZ8 aMdcu2dCWcRx7sHaput7ka3K4HEQKfSuFPoeM6VZMfa97Ai5FiX4xQhLQXDTWgAZbh 6/Rr+z58tTxHmyawa0E5VMaHFQEyh2P7GCn+PhOkvRAwDAXD8N7yEchASH5jSodHb6 SIV12qwXqlEbELbNKvawkpw0jZfuW90JiSy17Hw3uld7DLEi7gSUMqrlZDRvrNOCCy m/sWYHCKfS0CfYVV7szuK9afzA7iqzrFOil+zxRBJbHSPuQ8hsQIz9hD4035m67aAf K5x5/rtz98dRA== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 07:09:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: block 40264 by 40445 Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: disroot.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [178.21.23.139 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) block 40264 by 40445 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 05:40:17 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 09:40:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1lJ-0006QM-M4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:40:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:42549) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1lH-0006Po-MC for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:40:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id h15so13730912wrx.9 for <40445@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 02:40:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Znj1LlD9OVD73hg1UpFYBkWmNZHU1/R9zTHUY5xt2NI=; b=WrYbfr1/bU2+07jY3wwYiejVLYcNb3fl67eWuZsy1ZgBbnXuatlrZthm+6bX6SFo+P 55POBiS+OeJblwKEQDg4EfoMBKfi6sSOtyRC0egdi4KnKLD34n4RqxNcSfAh60qytowT Xe+n09hya8kskBZo8vzOxozhKwMj4qyQU5jgIP7qJkoIeP9jjaPrR423bemWkqIZDdT1 o64BYFycgPA2MKeTij9HpcX5uM+7s/2K0k66D7vd9mcg+7Zn+XfoPUW5lWuix2mLHT8c GJ+NSSmiDXGIDgoMq06G4qZqAVf5TM2jfyuVxg3SNqmCa+S6jfn4E3MqsSDRelLbBAc7 fD/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Znj1LlD9OVD73hg1UpFYBkWmNZHU1/R9zTHUY5xt2NI=; b=hgeG+DJwGMesfqiQDFfb1BZ9y5VTBlX8xcCcY2TgAoTzH40aFgHRkvHbjR+fIyLKGR 7U6GIsg/TJGJl0YC7vL/AZ6Mpe99X18bW+QwWvf3/Bg3V6eX2C0txh/R0IqKYngEUIdq HyRqc+8uJZGX3zu42ddaPUF1pBqq0bJk1zfVNgjKV3jJEqLPlifOCwMWZDlvECrUkHxe q9Ryl+FELiOORzWOFYXdqwZ6bswTOJuSB1APlSrE7hkOYieY3Mk6f9DtYoHNtelbIzFq ICzqilmV9LC5MJ2+CbehjdEv5RDfFcil4ooLVu3et/pZqyKUMKkWvHIn5RmqcVBwzTl1 3+Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubypohqLv3zTwU5unIz0loU8TcJiX8Glq15Y7mJayL5Ld8j1+f1 J63iPUdncMBSWpZQ+bILwLv2OWhx2fU/0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJNkGI9rFymeHW64t10day/Na1pNmxMEaOeuaiutBxkw6qqVLqwBHEyeO1vTYk6N+7Zg1ZvVQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8b8e:: with SMTP id o14mr12992506wra.392.1586079608560; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 02:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meru ([2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:4928:41d8:3661:4718]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k84sm19461568wmk.2.2020.04.05.02.40.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 02:40:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Mathieu Othacehe To: "Raghav Gururajan" Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. References: <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:40:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> (Raghav Gururajan's message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2020 07:07:51 +0000") Message-ID: <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Raghav, > + #:make-flags > + (list > + ;; Added -fPIC with other default options. > + "CCFLAGS=-fPIC -c -O2 -DNeedFunctionPrototypes=1 -Wall -Wno-comment") I wonder if we need all those options, the package seems to build fine without them. Could you have a look? Thanks, Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 05:46:02 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 09:46:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1qs-0006j3-8b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:46:02 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:59204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1qp-0006if-6l for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:46:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7020E2EA19; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 11:45:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxdwTeqisIGy; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 11:45:56 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586079956; bh=24ZPMglsZmRn+Ii3raBeBtsyA0gfoCaASi4dV68aFxs=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=WWxyUsG9uRS9d7ZdAE6LPtmVppB7h3tnxmPjyWBQe8Dfvyx14UiFHz/LwdEzuxvag z27IGOsRrUy+zIwGBI9mQRQounAsTyD2rTBCkdmc8SwP1MtpLm4zyw+uIyZrBQReUr gKdEjUIK6kRrqd2oFymBdjJAct2t1A+oywRiqkAMzvnuBUVnHqaSLEaKU9eYKZe7Pb 4v2FXWDS9Q7jH8QfvBx7DI2abv24B/U910NXmtNGVv9XjmNDB95qCy00gcg0I/ja4B PerSML/MOC1+rc1y44fuuXmKw2mtZ7Wt73ZJbptEbll7KgWgWyazj9OG7V4+K94EkA Nio9zGCoI5jYQ== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 09:45:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: "Mathieu Othacehe" In-Reply-To: <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Mathieu!=0A=0A>> + #:make-flags=0A>> + (list=0A>> + ;; Added -fPIC wit= h other default options.=0A>> + "CCFLAGS=3D-fPIC -c -O2 -DNeedFunctionPro= totypes=3D1 -Wall -Wno-comment")=0A> =0A> I wonder if we need all those o= ptions, the package seems to build fine=0A> without them. Could you have = a look?=0A=0AYes, Maxim and I, updated these options, to use libgsm in me= diastreamer, as a part of linphone packaging. :-)=0A=0ABtw, currently the= gsm package is in unusable state, after the commit "74c7f367daa554cedeb5= f02a00d1cd02acf1584b".=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:23:04 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:23:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2Qi-0000Lr-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:23:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:42053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2Qg-0000Kx-5r for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:23:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id h15so13804806wrx.9 for <40445@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:23:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=VBb4RAGItJlm5gcLnBoibeIGIphy+AMeDRLsujjr2j0=; b=B7A+WU0PeI1tqWxWR2mSdqU9aUXe/VILXAKQkAPlauysu03/UgIkxAM5F8iCoWzCWe MlKU1/z/Oz45vlJ49/vI/xAbFpvdTkk904yWhtao1wI505HR6qS/tqDhNxeeT4VQFwJT 6Vqa+pHSizt3EdKp0WZGH8RkBUdE+fLcLJIOP0yon5Ka1XN2oktxmB6T2hShL0tcxT+p OzTDKz0anYf7My92dvUPsr8vb+g5QAVDK6PeqsPW0GoxuRdKDQ1ER56afE38WZ2FrYis 1WDf65IrrJfXd/4HvXrJTrxzeN9ZBPPR2BgjSbhNQjcQ0c870U7HZInOX2mZPaTAamfH uHZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=VBb4RAGItJlm5gcLnBoibeIGIphy+AMeDRLsujjr2j0=; b=ZjNXXpBaGvSu7gr5FeXUawvFPplDl8nC33y7LhqXGw2zv8lQLxLPWZZ3t7Tfutg2kq njoNkXLb9/bfpt6dfTv1E2/Y3AXcAf+3+bMqrMIQWZBzAw6JKh3raWq7fYeNNhMO+liU Kny53l2CAg6rOkpB6G1tzvowN5b13zzFEXV68M3qwnp+eLfv6MoC7oP4PfVNCCwAoJHA kZsEtJ3ZxSro4XF3vWwWgtrAzmXRuwGgg4gNxUW0Zf4ee4IFZXbcC7MXxXl/DvFsA9E1 Ur3cXwYfFxNYYL+x751pLNmsbKI1pKjLzhPRfgciE1pGDdDiLtLB8/cW7RSrYnYdLvto RZQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZnGVPar9JXmoXSEgHgK6lpFNSmGgsbPFiDLoEWDutmNOLSTY5O 2UWP5l7eRbhiJWnke/T7EnnQbdgNm+7New== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL05KEXhnAn1+KC4PfTCUciHDhU+gTi6UW9+pGNA64NqJO7ihmnL7yeAupkPe+dxXTeyo6/dw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6588:: with SMTP id q8mr15885449wru.189.1586082176218; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meru ([2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:4928:41d8:3661:4718]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm18749111wmb.39.2020.04.05.03.22.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:22:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Mathieu Othacehe To: "Raghav Gururajan" Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. References: <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:22:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> (Raghav Gururajan's message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2020 09:45:55 +0000") Message-ID: <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > Yes, Maxim and I, updated these options, to use libgsm in mediastreamer, as a part of linphone packaging. :-) Ok, I see. Maybe it would be preferable to find a way to add "-fPIC" to CCFLAGS without having to repeat all the other options that are already present in the Makefile: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- CCFLAGS = -c -O2 -DNeedFunctionPrototypes=1 -Wall -Wno-comment --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Adding a new 'add-fpic-ccflag' phase could be an option? Thanks, Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:26:53 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:26:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2UO-0000c2-Qn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:26:53 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:48658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2UL-0000bf-1W for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:26:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12502EB66; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:26:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l60g6Tz2BSpL; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586082406; bh=VU1YURVwDwNp/W3qX0n2KV8hFUtIvc2RCNMpRYpQxjE=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=PRHF9xLDXdj5VL9V6UDVWEG9bXWD9dGzCKKqGMCpdF1Bm35lhyKyP2bjfpIvVj8lI MTKER7mziJMvKqOA+5NiGgqJ7r+pjSSVjEgjzQz7V83fCMKL+kDgTbYk5mRZu+WQjH oh85PgK3ZG4p+F/tAswwWuAxIvizSXtu+oWrFAr/WGItWIPoBquKuel23GbBOJdYnk tfiU8zuzfVs4s4jjJD3RsZ6suVG2O9a7kjeqLdpKrjNoQN3+U3VMyflJ5Qm/rv4Xfc qA8+nO6xiUolLzhztjQS35rjkSSRYGJwvbVYHPq60/lwliG1eIwbhzuRG7lyfXjUmR d9x4jJCVPLDBQ== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:26:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: "Mathieu Othacehe" In-Reply-To: <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Mathieu!=0A=0A> Ok, I see. Maybe it would be preferable to find a way = to add "-fPIC" to=0A> CCFLAGS without having to repeat all the other opti= ons that are already=0A> present in the Makefile:=0A> =0A> --8<----------= -----cut here---------------start------------->8---=0A> CCFLAGS =3D -c -O= 2 -DNeedFunctionPrototypes=3D1 -Wall -Wno-comment=0A> --8<---------------= cut here---------------end--------------->8---=0A> =0A> Adding a new 'add= -fpic-ccflag' phase could be an option?=0A=0AWe can do that too. But this= seems simple and less messy :-)=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:28:23 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:28:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2Vr-0000he-83 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:28:23 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:49738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2Vq-0000hT-2Y for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:28:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6747D2EB66; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:28:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgZaAcGzUVnk; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586082500; bh=u78LA5X0KP4zLxSWRqtjiiE7ck4GL+ui+USCRGodi3s=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=W1zRGkYRJcA5UtsKSWoEOvonktK1CoCQmKQOx+nPEDOi4n8MfHhy4qXUJ6SPaKIMj inCr8ox+fxqA0KRyy5NUqiDV6EheooI7eZrxrwVQyrCg6mXxGaIUimhX86ph0332Gj dDU39ablomxcAFXlzHXJCO7VS9mJiQY1ODN38BD8lf8MwPr2xtkdgbjqm9UOPPwRi6 2ofDbMBjQRCCADZD/lBsfrM0XGYqfgm3XsC3X/qm/SI1TIYZfZt6fNyqmdCpK1AkAM K+jKxlTd+ppunvs6N9fFFI1cw5MOGQOGpgPu0mdo/6NuV+JqGDy6ww+QsdRGqy4ZoL eB0q9pfkwfl5g== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:28:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: "Mathieu Othacehe" In-Reply-To: References: <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Mathieu!=0A=0A>> Ok, I see. Maybe it would be preferable to find a way= to add "-fPIC" to=0A>> CCFLAGS without having to repeat all the other op= tions that are already=0A>> present in the Makefile:=0A>> =0A>> --8<-----= ----------cut here---------------start------------->8---=0A>> CCFLAGS =3D= -c -O2 -DNeedFunctionPrototypes=3D1 -Wall -Wno-comment=0A>> --8<--------= -------cut here---------------end--------------->8---=0A>> =0A>> Adding a= new 'add-fpic-ccflag' phase could be an option?=0A> =0A> We can do that = too. But this seems simple and less messy :-)=0A=0AAlso, I believe, the m= ake-flag just overwrites that line in the source.=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:33:26 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:33:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2aj-00010C-Ph for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:33:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:45426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2ai-0000zk-4w for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:33:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id v5so2885026wrp.12 for <40445@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:33:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=6u5x8dPzFoRJDaRthuhb2fGdG3KKWk9KDhPiQoQJ+/s=; b=KBlwPfbVZW6TORryghJwscNiW9DssCdXFHnaA6FD/KxqfQsURNpzToudE7nQ3Xc17h 98aPjd/94Vhk7UYM6mWD66N2T3F2r5s7pfVZk6pPxu6Xyx7u6IOjUDJUKyKA3JSwOGgh YRMeUPIQQQkc5V4twJA+8fZCeZcn1N4O8n8u+HQntjujxzUIrLK7pskVZ1OkbvAusx3M x4m6MfF7MdrRJJ+i8yg5bFgRCqMZIkD4bHTdNETiZCBMAo6o13I51EzvMuklC7EqOe+u Sa8gTJhwUkgzxhvRLcE3rPAUWb2wrVeZZdcWhrWd5ImwSCYMAAgfpwamBY3V0jhSTjkY v4/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=6u5x8dPzFoRJDaRthuhb2fGdG3KKWk9KDhPiQoQJ+/s=; b=LBtRybHOJc1e5G0yQxb0o/tyuVFVdvrxMw4Kd47mqRQDWhRVnEn7TUX0I8VH0VEGvI l0PVX0Ndzhj31XxkGU7l/mrCumgtnslQ5eV/RqW1RBU70TO1iujWw3e9O9AYsMaRfExu ReAN1q71MvweI42EKffBs3C9ghdh5J7W0l1SPuJda07tE0HoSzs+2bHQ4pQ8AQ8oLf8r FDzB8BEJ4cao4Lb/HnFtl/gnRnk3Ufuj/4Pr0zeSJK9rDuSoe3zpPkAOLN9X03UB3U4D za80ALmADjtHNKtIgMDhvxUseCXVwTERXy034dHnucBgR+SA7VMoLCCyGpY7Rhrd/fKi foSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYZ8gWSHcA2deZ7juyDInjRmw9sMh0MHyAhxY429J1bUJC+jB+o jXAGFrv/H0z/V88/3c0zWx8qRNxpPsmQhQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJnJ0BhyFZYfPAmA5iyb0cC/EEpiZqcaSF6uSD4vpJR0oxeaEWevhHqJhi3XDSE8XANPW3tiw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4306:: with SMTP id h6mr12441867wrq.234.1586082798025; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meru ([2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:4928:41d8:3661:4718]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u131sm20400887wmg.41.2020.04.05.03.33.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 03:33:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Mathieu Othacehe To: "Raghav Gururajan" Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. References: <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:33:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> (Raghav Gururajan's message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:28:20 +0000") Message-ID: <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >> We can do that too. But this seems simple and less messy :-) > > Also, I believe, the make-flag just overwrites that line in the source. Yes that's what it does. But if in a future release this package updates its CCFLAGS list in the Makefile, we will have to update our own package definition accordingly. That's why adding 'CCFLAGS += -fPIC' somewhere seems safer to me. Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:37:17 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:37:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2eT-0001DY-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:37:17 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:47252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2eR-0001DM-Gg for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:37:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4792EB83; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:37:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hm_zfhFXDouP; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:37:13 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586083033; bh=8uAV6kmSo2IYMaVtVVLnqTGl6sJNMPcVmvMSK6HRwXE=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gjFX68K2xMKn8ha8HrsX7lpjKlQcYkcGk6KKnW3ufC96/IG4oX8UfB9aXhmasnipn 58P25iwqyUq9BGVXWGgeUq9srS7to689pvZSCmf42Me9/6VRRVCYK8SFT91rlOmaFj 1yUkT8AFswD5HJybDdXnj4ybMvDy8Q+oD8SFlWmMDQanAXAXhSHfXReJbTs+QTKgKp +P2RYyVQLGRD8POIlmG7nLgu2g1q2+pia0m6Cv+MEf64Isq9ApesYUO1m9odW1TxpL 1x6TCmJxnAxZ453+YPjjH1+l7AKYxeDj1SRGWr5gX8Xr3bHHZ4Rjx4g8krEGXtaYF/ eSbLyFG5oKj/g== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:37:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: "Mathieu Othacehe" In-Reply-To: <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > Yes that's what it does. But if in a future release this package update= s=0A> its CCFLAGS list in the Makefile, we will have to update our own pa= ckage=0A> definition accordingly. That's why adding 'CCFLAGS +=3D -fPIC' = somewhere=0A> seems safer to me.=0A=0AAh, gotcha! Hmm, I don't know how t= o do that through. I'll have to look into code base for examples.=0A=0ARe= gards,=0ARG. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:52:37 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:52:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2tJ-00024y-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:52:37 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:53708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2tH-00024l-Cx for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:52:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F542E92B; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:52:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H2Ljgqlw5na5; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586083952; bh=psMFLU8W8lidcxMBdKbmVkta5mdXddotqVa3/S2OMHY=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=EqwTJKHYBWv8ZyROr0YpkEpkQeDelt7ZWefSCYQwqLvNAW8yaVPcJV4UOV7TcLDGe Xy5uvjR1gvrvrE9FVaH6jCw+2CPW1rJLsibKz+RjRQsHn9TFt1ucEDhzmC0jUQ6UMX O4NpNiPMW/kXChj7V0O/J5I87YmyeSvsZXXZcJYN0McRN1+JQ3PBytqSaZ/SLSJxni dmtYkkM2AP4jH19MuiVmzoFlh6Sh2ED8DUM4aw3YpSl9rjOqj6kiOlIvLIbSwbZ5AY NiKNgtg7XU3NcVbF/Mu8sOvcNizbLsbQUvTwvmMp2IFvsmB+TKPdlMwFvzLdvgznGm 4cFwhBcxWyygQ== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:52:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: <14a100f71916e1de2ba69279984e320b@disroot.org> Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: "Mathieu Othacehe" In-Reply-To: References: <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >> Yes that's what it does. But if in a future release this package updat= es=0A>> its CCFLAGS list in the Makefile, we will have to update our own = package=0A>> definition accordingly. That's why adding 'CCFLAGS +=3D -fPI= C' somewhere=0A>> seems safer to me.=0A> =0A> Ah, gotcha! Hmm, I don't kn= ow how to do that through. I'll have to look into code base for=0A> examp= les.=0A=0ANo I also think that its a double-edged sword. 'CCFLAGS +=3D -f= PIC' also has to be changed/removed, if new release adds "-fPIC"?=0A=0ARe= gards,=0ARG. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 06:53:37 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 10:53:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2uH-00029A-9o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:53:37 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:44482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2uG-00028z-DB for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:53:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C462E92B; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:53:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0fOdeXZZ3EB; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1586084014; bh=EQu1TCsL/6pbNGbtwGcOcErFTk4o68ueSxuWZt7Kn9I=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=XhKWBawnAeKrLi5VfY4whWI0BDgEwohcCrC4YMuGrmd2/Ee/HujOwJg9p3NxncKzd gs/83ngf/t2KpMXjpt2DomUuKoNwPJVGu5PbIcNzvgMYKF10PnLxg0ti9F6WX2+bDF xTFB8SZ4WLAypB9qcUJrBat3CkOxzI2nNZ+yNB+00s0Pc0LoVw1gTjfsuZXN57oSeo gYKOkAytE4OqmTNBqLj3xSLXSz23tz2+DkyjXvnCdYPyoQ7MD/wvxNYZHfibzsEzvO y2xjjr5hGyUP/tg1ymAD+WlXTP03TwNHjtFnE98uMZejw43Sz9rqH5E/UAbtzKpWMt ehGrEzigOkjHA== Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:53:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: <41a61a922bd5ec0c22388c6c8d60e235@disroot.org> Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. To: "Mathieu Othacehe" In-Reply-To: <14a100f71916e1de2ba69279984e320b@disroot.org> References: <14a100f71916e1de2ba69279984e320b@disroot.org> <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>> Yes that's what it does. But if in a future release this package upda= tes=0A>>> its CCFLAGS list in the Makefile, we will have to update our ow= n package=0A>>> definition accordingly. That's why adding 'CCFLAGS +=3D -= fPIC' somewhere=0A>>> seems safer to me.=0A>> =0A>> Ah, gotcha! Hmm, I do= n't know how to do that through. I'll have to look into code base for=0A>= > examples.=0A> =0A> No I also think that its a double-edged sword. 'CCFL= AGS +=3D -fPIC' also has to be changed/removed,=0A> if new release adds "= -fPIC"?=0A=0A* Now From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 13:38:58 2020 Received: (at 40445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 17:38:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9EY-0003kG-KQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 13:38:58 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f177.google.com ([209.85.160.177]:34353) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9EX-0003jq-BF for 40445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 13:38:58 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 14so10739596qtp.1 for <40445@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:38:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=9oL0GHRUjmf5ajJ3DpMCtFYDBxxm904wD9fqS0MsyFY=; b=PSGnI58OAVZBt6fbReyyHvEmBAEYrXkeNtSooR3+JE+zkhgjT4I2IVQYYMytteuIhn BB5VOxdcUJ19vH13Y9sMpvVQtVFJzM14IpepccELTE1gtpxbI5Y/2q4yXsc4nhaJteze ZRZAJGQhPZ6l/AdO4Qh3dajwXoWiEBpuDPMenJxsENOaex/KtbGmSWmBIKdkch9gFfcv 0IPoDgp5t3Gv1kBWFSiujrhjchoUg0jhIq24xJh3IqER1PBbVQGHtL3PzNFXhSXFDzHD 19IyxRz4WbFobYZVLoQKWBsXYG0jqPQIdGeI0EqJqO1vrl2+rmRONkHdENTt+A5COF9u dCdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=9oL0GHRUjmf5ajJ3DpMCtFYDBxxm904wD9fqS0MsyFY=; b=pSfB1l3oh+qdF2+dy4PCRLMdlp2KpHmLapQOexv1SGHVslYxB5AhNd7Hr+PGV6tgYV HjJLMxQjzvQBQM7K+cJF0yyKKx6v4SCXuXhx/h6UxDUjD8XOoBoeFiqErOXvc2fvN8zY 9iYJAqPadXEGJMELXmP6TWn+KJRa8sL2v+1pKazxDohqiOi5evh/QZTa2DbCg1Y4+3EZ iPKeqGiAiDt5+qEFb7G3N8BHgOYqfGpCW8TAN5pkTEXxxsiuG+qJwCyrjL8Ak48xox1T JeHRB0sy5Q62a41Jnfedn+wdfHuLoBUEFGuFWR3CBCrvJFG240atC0BYGNkfS2sKI/XY fqqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYjAlH0q4WMxAwVvvDR/kAQXNAk+b3u/2oH48Omw/7IHDkCG69b WXUtaw3Z+64TSIeEnP0w/TvA+Ich1Ys= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLsV2vX4DZX1yUJxGv2Ke+SZaF8OJRvAiXKQWDT+jLxOGV6YzZI5BAtpDOedyd4y6Znq3ppmg== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3466:: with SMTP id w93mr17515050qtd.307.1586108331519; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-205-151-56-232.b2b2c.ca. [205.151.56.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y132sm12751381qka.19.2020.04.05.10.38.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:38:51 -0700 (PDT) From: maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: maxim@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me To: "Raghav Gururajan" Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. References: <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 13:38:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> (Raghav Gururajan's message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2020 09:45:55 +0000") Message-ID: <87blo53k9r.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445 Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , 40445@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, "Raghav Gururajan" writes: > Hi Mathieu! > >>> + #:make-flags >>> + (list >>> + ;; Added -fPIC with other default options. >>> + "CCFLAGS=-fPIC -c -O2 -DNeedFunctionPrototypes=1 -Wall -Wno-comment") >> >> I wonder if we need all those options, the package seems to build fine >> without them. Could you have a look? > > Yes, Maxim and I, updated these options, to use libgsm in mediastreamer, as a part of linphone packaging. :-) > > Btw, currently the gsm package is in unusable state, after the commit "74c7f367daa554cedeb5f02a00d1cd02acf1584b". > > Regards, > RG. Ooops. Sorry about that. I meant: - #:make-flags '("INSTALL_ROOT=%output" - "CCFLAGS=-fPIC \ + #:make-flags (list (string-append "INSTALL_ROOT=" %output) + "CCFLAGS=-fPIC \ But I'll take into accounts comments from Mathieu, which make sense. Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 05 14:21:17 2020 Received: (at 40445-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2020 18:21:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9tV-00062v-8q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:21:17 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:35792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9tS-00062P-0T for 40445-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:21:15 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id s30so1217362qth.2 for <40445-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:21:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=wFat0ULP0wIBOSWQ2RdcZJHmzF8fKiB6NzdTIW1pDdM=; b=o7OQDDujeR1TOfePI/nbdI8BCoFOWAoJe1nI2lFIhQ/T3KO4y5JzY/ABnIMdxZO//3 UCczBoqwXanyiP+94YRsxuWIphDh5KfNCB70ep3g/9CsX6WLUS8zUfr/DutzK+5vALHW EbzQho+KfyKocSGKu31RqEQ54qxIMKzlGmBi6eovzrbfvn79DrNiJgSD1Y/B3dM8MM3Y YLDh57PYddEpix4TOy074cm0xEwFEBIiweY/I9rtD7V+dniSzWrgBUgLFXhQroRxsmaY ip5YJEA6hL7LMCqpp97+RSYHSnmgVimlQBfi1xfcX4XZnt5h5p2p9W4dpkmWN7R6gRyb OvTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=wFat0ULP0wIBOSWQ2RdcZJHmzF8fKiB6NzdTIW1pDdM=; b=PW2fJQVCgog8uXSPJAV/JDm8vginHlZsdeQdJ2EgBGXg+Wte1TpQ16xf/ifhx8Co4i v6d1sHPBMM1vKFqqfO0Lqy1ke/8CoA4UamXPd1Gw1nqHwgzRCuZMbTixjgNSuZTgePAX YkTPSKS7JaDrx4z6+6kZQzURa1McTAMV9NnNy/hFQPLkQ5CwwQnJVXBwe1QHCn9LcTzz pmf+PC5KbFzCNRr0QJkXMG29cC04qlsRy3LrKKu0Ayae23iF2dFJgQ0NZ/h/8pI+fI78 ETkAbSgFFqaFMvWJj9hMLYabMCQIiktEXOAM4lGNt/b+4WI2rxy+n//pl3mHL+HjWqVh RhnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuauQoBxclumWSdhc4iPo9X9JGQovnVUCSICP52pcunUpqJ9yPnw wssIwKJP0An3S6sdOAMJ6hL39sIQp+g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJvBOyT7j93LL4KLjm7FmEaCswZR51RGoJlfd7s9Ar8MK32JChnPnCjiBlzLhnOMVxHV39i6g== X-Received: by 2002:aed:37e8:: with SMTP id j95mr17975487qtb.9.1586110866561; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-205-151-56-232.b2b2c.ca. [205.151.56.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r46sm13036893qtb.87.2020.04.05.11.21.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT) From: maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: maxim@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me To: maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com Subject: Re: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. References: <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> <87blo53k9r.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:20:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87blo53k9r.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (maxim cournoyer's message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2020 13:38:40 -0400") Message-ID: <878sj93ibb.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40445-done Cc: Raghav Gururajan , Mathieu Othacehe , 40445-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com writes: > Hello, > > "Raghav Gururajan" writes: > >> Hi Mathieu! >> >>>> + #:make-flags >>>> + (list >>>> + ;; Added -fPIC with other default options. >>>> + "CCFLAGS=-fPIC -c -O2 -DNeedFunctionPrototypes=1 -Wall -Wno-comment") >>> >>> I wonder if we need all those options, the package seems to build fine >>> without them. Could you have a look? >> >> Yes, Maxim and I, updated these options, to use libgsm in mediastreamer, as a part of linphone packaging. :-) >> >> Btw, currently the gsm package is in unusable state, after the commit "74c7f367daa554cedeb5f02a00d1cd02acf1584b". >> >> Regards, >> RG. > > Ooops. Sorry about that. I meant: > > - #:make-flags '("INSTALL_ROOT=%output" > - "CCFLAGS=-fPIC \ > + #:make-flags (list (string-append "INSTALL_ROOT=" %output) > + "CCFLAGS=-fPIC \ > > But I'll take into accounts comments from Mathieu, which make sense. > > Maxim I've fixed the breakage I caused with commit 5b05f8e9654ea722270c45c0fd0eead369bc0daf, and committed the update to gsm 1.0.19 from Raghav on top as 5e16e4401f854d39f5fbebaf247750e554bd4a09. Closing. Thanks for the ideas! Maxim From unknown Wed Sep 10 10:35:53 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator