From eliz@gnu.org Sun Mar 29 09:26:29 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2020 02:35:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIXxM-0001cS-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:26:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIXxL-0006qp-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:26:28 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIXxL-0007w8-26; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:26:27 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4995 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jIXxJ-0007TE-U4; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:26:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:26:33 +0300 Message-Id: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org CC: Alan Mackenzie Subject: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:26:29 -0000 When I visit a C source file that already has a buffer that visits it, and that file has been changed behind Emacs's back by "git pull", Emacs frequently signals an error. Here's an example: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (args-out-of-range # 1 217135) parse-partial-sexp(1 217135 nil nil nil syntax-table) c-after-change-mark-abnormal-strings(214738 215088 0) #f(compiled-function (fn) #)(c-after-change-mark-abnormal-strings) mapc(#f(compiled-function (fn) #) (c-depropertize-new-text c-after-change-escape-NL-in-string c-parse-quotes-after-change c-after-change-mark-abnormal-strings c-extend-font-lock-region-for-macros c-neutralize-syntax-in-CPP c-change-expand-fl-region)) c-after-change(214738 215088 0) insert-file-contents("branch/src/xfaces.c" t nil nil t) revert-buffer-insert-file-contents--default-function("branch/src/xfaces.c" nil) revert-buffer--default(t t) revert-buffer(t t) find-file-noselect("branch/src/xfaces.c" nil nil t) find-file("branch/src/xfaces.c" t) funcall-interactively(find-file "branch/src/xfaces.c" t) call-interactively(find-file nil nil) command-execute(find-file) In this particular case, the buffer's point-max is 216784, which explains the error, but I have no idea where did the 217135 value come from, because AFAICT the latest change in Git (the emacs-27 branch) made that file larger, not smaller. I hope this can be fixed soon, as this happens quite a lot to me, and is very annoying. In GNU Emacs 27.0.90 (build 3, i686-pc-mingw32) of 2020-03-06 built on HOME-C4E4A596F7 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 System Description: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 (v5.1.0.2600) Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Configured using: 'configure -C --prefix=/d/usr --with-wide-int --with-modules 'CFLAGS=-Og -gdwarf-4 -g3'' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUND NOTIFY W32NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 HARFBUZZ ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS MODULES THREADS JSON PDUMPER LCMS2 GMP Important settings: value of $LANG: ENU locale-coding-system: cp1255 Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec password-cache epa derived epg epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs text-property-search time-date subr-x seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader cl-loaddefs cl-lib sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp disp-table term/w32-win w32-win w32-vars term/common-win tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads w32notify w32 lcms2 multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 50720 11407) (symbols 48 7171 1) (strings 16 18862 2117) (string-bytes 1 532860) (vectors 16 9508) (vector-slots 8 127133 8382) (floats 8 21 66) (intervals 40 252 93) (buffers 888 11)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 16 08:25:00 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 12:25:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIWUe-0005FG-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 08:25:00 -0400 Received: from mail.choca.pics ([80.67.172.235]:60266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIWUc-0005F7-Fm for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 08:24:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3E218197CC6 for <40317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id jlvL3pXeScHv for <40317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0551818F7C3 for <40317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at choca.pics Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ybKIqlKQ32JE for <40317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (203.99.92.92.rev.sfr.net [92.92.99.203]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58FD518195BEB for <40317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Damien Cassou To: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I face the same problem while editing C# files in GNU Emacs 27.1. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 16 10:26:37 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 14:26:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYOL-0000JW-Bb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:26:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYOJ-0000JK-QO for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:26:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYOE-0004dJ-4h; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:26:30 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1472 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYOD-0007gG-DU; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:26:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:26:39 +0300 Message-Id: <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Damien Cassou In-Reply-To: <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> (message from Damien Cassou on Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:55 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Damien Cassou > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:24:55 +0200 > > > I face the same problem while editing C# files in GNU Emacs 27.1. Does that happen with _any_ C# file? If not, can you post an example of a file where this happens, and a recipe to reproduce the problem? Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 16 10:51:46 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 14:51:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYmg-0000xE-GZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:51:46 -0400 Received: from mail.choca.pics ([80.67.172.235]:34496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYmf-0000x6-7T for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:51:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id A061418197CC6; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id oXSsylfyDrdn; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3140F1818F7C3; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at choca.pics Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TXiSPShz1Web; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (203.99.92.92.rev.sfr.net [92.92.99.203]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECF0218195BEB; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Damien Cassou To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Does that happen with _any_ C# file? If not, can you post an example > of a file where this happens, and a recipe to reproduce the problem? I don't know how to reproduce, it is infrequent and seems random. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 16 11:09:13 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 15:09:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3Z-0001Rh-7f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3X-0001RQ-7A for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3R-0003is-5b; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:05 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4127 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3Q-0000uv-6k; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:09:13 +0300 Message-Id: <83lfh97o86.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Damien Cassou In-Reply-To: <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> (message from Damien Cassou on Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:42 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Damien Cassou > Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:42 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Does that happen with _any_ C# file? If not, can you post an example > > of a file where this happens, and a recipe to reproduce the problem? > > I don't know how to reproduce, it is infrequent and seems random. Ah, so it isn't consistent. And the Lisp backtrace is the same as the one shown in the original report? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 16 14:19:20 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 18:19:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIc1Y-0005yo-BB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:19:20 -0400 Received: from mail.choca.pics ([80.67.172.235]:38494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIc1V-0005yf-Hu for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:19:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF0A1818F7C3; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id yYaKAVPSFo5y; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C4018195BEB; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at choca.pics Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id eEn62Rfuhshf; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (203.99.92.92.rev.sfr.net [92.92.99.203]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C88B18002302; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Damien Cassou To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: <83lfh97o86.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> <83lfh97o86.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0wtmvod.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Ah, so it isn't consistent. > > And the Lisp backtrace is the same as the one shown in the original > report? yes it is. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 17 22:15:18 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 02:15:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ5vg-0003rX-Il for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:15:18 -0400 Received: from mta.tntech.edu ([149.149.2.87]:45987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ560-0002WP-1B for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:21:52 -0400 Received: from math.tntech.edu (unknown [149.149.102.6]) by mta.tntech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F1C3000D90; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:21:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from norden.tntech.edu ([149.149.102.4] helo=norden.math.tntech.edu) by math.tntech.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ55v-0007Bb-5m; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:21:47 -0500 Received: by norden.math.tntech.edu (Postfix, from userid 742) id 2365A2572B73; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:21:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeff Norden To: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: <87k0wtmvod.fsf@cassou.me> (message from Damien Cassou on Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:19:14 +0200) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:21:47 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SA-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-SA-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "math.tntech.edu", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. If you have any questions, contact @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:15:15 -0400 Cc: Damien Cassou , Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I came across this by searching for args-out-of-range bugs. I recently found a bug in forward-comment (which I'll post separately) that was causing out-of-range errors for me, and I wondered if forward-comment might be relevant to other issues. It isn't in this case, but I think I did find the source of the problem. The function c-after-change (in cc-mode.el) was changed between 26.3 and 27.1, to handle more cases where the before and/or after change functions get called multiple times. The function now begins (line numbers are from the current master version) with: 1993 ;; Note: c-just-done-before-change is nil, t, or 'whole-buffer. 1994 (unless (c-called-from-text-property-change-p) 1995 (save-restriction 1996 (widen) 1997 (unless c-just-done-before-change 1998 (c-before-change (point-min) (point-max))) 1999 (unless (eq c-just-done-before-change t) 2000 (setq beg (point-min) 2001 end (point-max) 2002 old-len (- end beg) 2003 c-new-BEG (point-min) 2004 c-new-END (point-max))) 2005 (setq c-just-done-before-change nil))) 2006 2007 ;; (c-new-BEG c-new-END) will be the region to fontify. It may become 2008 ;; larger than (beg end). 2009 (setq c-new-END (- (+ c-new-END (- end beg)) old-len)) It looks like it is now possible for the last line above, which increments c-new-END, to run even if c-new-END has been set to the after-change value of point-max. That will make c-new-END point past the end of the buffer. --- In the backtrace from March, > c-after-change(214738 215088 0) indicates that 350 bytes have been added to the buffer, although not at end. If point-max was 216785 (which would be the value if the buffer-length was actually 216784), then line-2009 would set c-new-END to 216785+350 = 217135, which would then be used by c-after-change-mark-abnormal-strings when calling parse-partial-sexp. This fits the args-out-of-range error in the backtrace. --- A simple fix would be to change line-2009 to (setq c-new-END (min (- (+ c-new-END (- end beg)) old-len) (point-max))) But, maybe the third 'unless' could be changed to 'if' instead, with the increment as the else. I don't know if c-new-END might need to be incremented when c-called-from-text-property-change-p is true. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to trigger this bug myself. If you want to be 100% sure about it, you might try adding (if (> c-new-END (point-max)) (error "c-new-END is too big! %d > %d" c-new-END (point-max))) right after line-2009 and see if it raises an error before it gets to parse-partial-sexp. Hope this helps, -Jeff From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 15:46:09 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 19:46:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJMKf-0004zU-FA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:46:09 -0400 Received: from mail.choca.pics ([80.67.172.235]:54694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJMKc-0004zL-3j for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:46:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7005718197CC6; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ApmAzeJm6oe2; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDF51818FAF3; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:46:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at choca.pics Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ByhFdUvsUOec; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (203.99.92.92.rev.sfr.net [92.92.99.203]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D6461819576F; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:46:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Damien Cassou To: Jeff Norden , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:46:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87imcac1hg.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Jeff, Jeff Norden writes: > Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to trigger this bug myself. If you want > to be 100% sure about it, you might try adding > > (if (> c-new-END (point-max)) > (error "c-new-END is too big! %d > %d" c-new-END (point-max))) > > right after line-2009 and see if it raises an error before it gets to > parse-partial-sexp. I wasn't sure if you wanted me to only add the `if` or if you wanted me to also change the previous line. I've just added the `if` with the attached patch and will report if I get the new error message. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=emacs-bug-40317.patch --- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-mode.el.orig 2020-07-29 23:40:41.000000000 +0200 +++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-mode.el 2020-09-18 15:36:37.409779350 +0200 @@ -2007,6 +2007,10 @@ ;; larger than (beg end). (setq c-new-END (- (+ c-new-END (- end beg)) old-len)) + ;; Trying to fix bug#40317 + (if (> c-new-END (point-max)) + (error "c-new-END is too big! %d > %d" c-new-END (point-max))) + (unless (c-called-from-text-property-change-p) (setq c-just-done-before-change nil) (c-save-buffer-state (case-fold-search) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 16:13:45 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 20:13:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJMlM-0005e1-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:13:45 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:13263 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJMlK-0005dm-Rh for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:13:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 41512 invoked by uid 3782); 18 Sep 2020 20:13:36 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15d0a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.93.10]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:13:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 1017 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Sep 2020 20:13:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:13:35 +0000 To: Jeff Norden Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error Message-ID: <20200918201335.GE5497@ACM> References: <87k0wtmvod.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Damien Cassou , Eli Zaretskii , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Jeff. Thanks for contributing towards this bug. On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 20:21:47 -0500, Jeff Norden wrote: > I came across this by searching for args-out-of-range bugs. I recently found > a bug in forward-comment (which I'll post separately) that was causing > out-of-range errors for me, and I wondered if forward-comment might be > relevant to other issues. It isn't in this case, but I think I did find the > source of the problem. > The function c-after-change (in cc-mode.el) was changed between 26.3 and 27.1, > to handle more cases where the before and/or after change functions get called > multiple times. The function now begins (line numbers are from the current > master version) with: > 1993 ;; Note: c-just-done-before-change is nil, t, or 'whole-buffer. > 1994 (unless (c-called-from-text-property-change-p) > 1995 (save-restriction > 1996 (widen) > 1997 (unless c-just-done-before-change > 1998 (c-before-change (point-min) (point-max))) > 1999 (unless (eq c-just-done-before-change t) > 2000 (setq beg (point-min) > 2001 end (point-max) > 2002 old-len (- end beg) > 2003 c-new-BEG (point-min) > 2004 c-new-END (point-max))) > 2005 (setq c-just-done-before-change nil))) > 2006 > 2007 ;; (c-new-BEG c-new-END) will be the region to fontify. It may become > 2008 ;; larger than (beg end). > 2009 (setq c-new-END (- (+ c-new-END (- end beg)) old-len)) > It looks like it is now possible for the last line above, which increments > c-new-END, to run even if c-new-END has been set to the after-change value > of point-max. That will make c-new-END point past the end of the buffer. [ .... ] > Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to trigger this bug myself. If you want > to be 100% sure about it, you might try adding I've spent quite a long time looking at this, trying various means to trigger the error (via `insert-file-contents' and `revert-buffer'). Then it suddenly dawned on me that the (setq c-new-END (.....)) is OK. If the body of the the last `unless' has been run, (- end beg) and old-len are equal to each other, and to the buffer length. So c-new-END doesn't get changed in this case. Of course, it's hopelessly confusing coding. It seems to have confused you, and it certainly confused me, even though I wrote it myself only a short while ago. If that code is to remain as it is, it definitely needs commenting. There seems to be an aesthetic benefit in keeping the (setq c-new-BEG ...) separate from the ~13 line section which deals with the out-of-sequence calling of before-change-functions and after-change-functions. But I'll sleep on that thought. [ .... ] > Hope this helps, > -Jeff Yes, it has helped, thanks. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 18:03:13 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 22:03:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJOTJ-0008JS-F4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:03:13 -0400 Received: from mta.tntech.edu ([149.149.2.87]:21543) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJOTH-0008JK-QQ for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:03:12 -0400 Received: from math.tntech.edu (unknown [149.149.102.6]) by mta.tntech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDB23000066; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from norden.tntech.edu ([149.149.102.4] helo=norden.math.tntech.edu) by math.tntech.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJOTE-0001Ho-2I; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:08 -0500 Received: by norden.math.tntech.edu (Postfix, from userid 742) id 061092572B73; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeff Norden To: Alan Mackenzie Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: <20200918201335.GE5497@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:13:35 +0000) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SA-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-SA-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "math.tntech.edu", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. If you have any questions, contact @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: damien@cassou.me, eliz@gnu.org, 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > I've spent quite a long time looking at this, trying various means to > trigger the error (via `insert-file-contents' and `revert-buffer'). > > Then it suddenly dawned on me that the (setq c-new-END (.....)) is OK. > If the body of the the last `unless' has been run, (- end beg) and > old-len are equal to each other, and to the buffer length. So c-new-END > doesn't get changed in this case. Yup, I guess I was more tired than I realized when I sent that off last night, and jumped to a conclusion. So, I'll fall back to my original theory, which I changed when noticed the code that precedes the (setq c-new-END ...) line. Somehow, and I sure don't know how, I think that c-after-change gets called with: c-new-END already set to the value of point-max after the insertion; and with the other variables set so that that beg, end, and old-len remain unchanged. It's the only scenario that I can see that fits the backtrace that Eli posted. If Damien and/or Eli can temporarily try out the test that I suggested and get it to trigger, I think that would verify this. In fact, maybe warn would be even better: (if (> c-new-END (point-max)) (warn "c-new-END is too big! %d > %d" c-new-END (point-max))) This should produce a warnings window *and* a backtrace with the args-out-of-range error. Don't change the line above yet if the goal is to diagnose this. Assuming this does cause a combination warning and backtrace to occur, then I guess there are two choices: 1) Try to figure out how the after-change function gets called in this way, or 2) Just add a min to prevent c-new-END from exceeding point-max, and leave it at that. Regards, -Jeff From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 19 03:35:14 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2020 07:35:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJXOr-0005Mj-Vw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 03:35:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJXOp-0005MT-4p for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 03:35:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJXOh-00088A-SZ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 03:35:03 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2895 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJXOg-00081a-Vn; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 03:35:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 10:35:18 +0300 Message-Id: <83zh5m2p8p.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jeff Norden In-Reply-To: (message from Jeff Norden on Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:07 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: damien@cassou.me, acm@muc.de, 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Jeff Norden > Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, > damien@cassou.me > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:07 -0500 > > Somehow, and I sure don't know how, I think that c-after-change gets > called with: c-new-END already set to the value of point-max after the > insertion; and with the other variables set so that that beg, end, and > old-len remain unchanged. It's the only scenario that I can see that > fits the backtrace that Eli posted. > > If Damien and/or Eli can temporarily try out the test that I suggested > and get it to trigger, I think that would verify this. In fact, maybe > warn would be even better: > > (if (> c-new-END (point-max)) > (warn "c-new-END is too big! %d > %d" c-new-END (point-max))) Unfortunately, the problem no longer happens to me, not in many moons. Not sure why: I didn't change my usage patterns. Hopefully, Damien will be able to test this theory. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 19 07:48:22 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2020 11:48:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJbLp-0003GR-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:48:22 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:23989 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJbLn-0003GD-Oa for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:48:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 83510 invoked by uid 3782); 19 Sep 2020 11:48:13 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p2e5d565a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.93.86.90]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 13:48:12 +0200 Received: (qmail 7652 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Sep 2020 11:48:12 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:48:12 +0000 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error Message-ID: <20200919114812.GB6057@ACM> References: <83zh5m2p8p.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83zh5m2p8p.fsf@gnu.org> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: damien@cassou.me, 40317@debbugs.gnu.org, Jeff Norden X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Eli. On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 10:35:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Jeff Norden > > Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, > > damien@cassou.me > > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:03:07 -0500 > > Somehow, and I sure don't know how, I think that c-after-change gets > > called with: c-new-END already set to the value of point-max after the > > insertion; and with the other variables set so that that beg, end, and > > old-len remain unchanged. It's the only scenario that I can see that > > fits the backtrace that Eli posted. > > If Damien and/or Eli can temporarily try out the test that I suggested > > and get it to trigger, I think that would verify this. In fact, maybe > > warn would be even better: > > (if (> c-new-END (point-max)) > > (warn "c-new-END is too big! %d > %d" c-new-END (point-max))) > Unfortunately, the problem no longer happens to me, not in many > moons. Not sure why: I didn't change my usage patterns. The reason is the following patch, which was committed slightly before you reported the bug, but before you had updated your Emacs to include it: commit a3c2d186eb514b505e61c2a89a1df886dbfcb06b Author: Alan Mackenzie Date: Wed Mar 4 21:17:04 2020 +0000 CC Mode: Fix the handling of two adjacent after-change-functionses. The bug involved failing to set c-new-END correctly, which lead to an args-out-of-range error when after-change-functions was invoked twice without an intervening invocation of before-change-functions. * lisp/progmodes/cc-mode.el (c-after-change): Correct a coding error in the handling of c-just-done-before-change. What triggered the bug there was insert-file-contents not calling before-change-functions when called from revert-buffer. > Hopefully, Damien will be able to test this theory. Thanks. What Damien has found appears to be a bug distinct from the one you reported in March. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 20 13:25:30 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2020 17:25:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kK35a-0006qW-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 13:25:30 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:29792 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kK35Y-0006qJ-Pa for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 13:25:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 98773 invoked by uid 3782); 20 Sep 2020 17:25:18 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15126.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.81.38]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:25:18 +0200 Received: (qmail 29411 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Sep 2020 17:25:17 -0000 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:25:17 +0000 To: Damien Cassou Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error Message-ID: <20200920172517.GA10641@ACM> References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Hello, Damien. On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 16:51:42 +0200, Damien Cassou wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Does that happen with _any_ C# file? If not, can you post an example > > of a file where this happens, and a recipe to reproduce the problem? > I don't know how to reproduce, it is infrequent and seems random. What do you mean by "infrequent"? Once a month, once a week, once a day, several times a day? Does it happen frequently enough that you would notice if it stopped happening? If so .... csharp-mode has an inappropriate use of syntax-propertize-function, which might be damaging things. Could you please disable this with code like the following in your .emacs (Note: this involves a minor loss of functionality): (defun dc-spf-disable () (setq syntax-propertize-function nil)) (add-hook 'csharp-mode-hook 'dc-spf-disable) And then see if the problem with csharp-mode still occurs, and report it here, please. Thanks! > -- > Damien Cassou > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 10:19:56 2020 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2020 14:19:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY8mS-0003lA-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:19:56 -0400 Received: from mail.choca.pics ([80.67.172.235]:55286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY8mQ-0003l0-Kp for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:19:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFB31818FAFB; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id eBjBZ6YgZgq5; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2693418195BEB; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at choca.pics Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id KmDSYajwSLKE; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (203.99.92.92.rev.sfr.net [92.92.99.203]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7E1218191BB1; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:51 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Cassou To: Alan Mackenzie Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: <20200920172517.GA10641@ACM> References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> <20200920172517.GA10641@ACM> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6w5qflk.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alan Mackenzie writes: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 16:51:42 +0200, Damien Cassou wrote: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Does that happen with _any_ C# file? If not, can you post an example >> > of a file where this happens, and a recipe to reproduce the problem? > >> I don't know how to reproduce, it is infrequent and seems random. > > What do you mean by "infrequent"? Once a month, once a week, once a > day, several times a day? This didn't happen for some weeks and happened twice today: Warning (emacs): c-new-END is too big! 1217 > 729 Warning (emacs): c-new-END is too big! 2331 > 1902 > Does it happen frequently enough that you > would notice if it stopped happening? If so .... It would take me a while to realize. > csharp-mode has an inappropriate use of syntax-propertize-function, > which might be damaging things. I don't know if your comment is still relevant because csharp-mode changed a lot recently. I'm on latest master (commit fb1f7d57675df8c38bbf9cc3c99e0059c8b16d7f). > Could you please disable this with code > like the following in your .emacs (Note: this involves a minor loss of > functionality): do you still recommend it? Best -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 20 10:11:40 2022 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2022 15:11:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33542 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLnsB-0000o4-Qx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:11:40 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLnsA-0000np-8s for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:11:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WS7RvAUQfhQ8D61A2ORCcdpgdzS4+EB4mNNp0ekbYOg=; b=gKbK3It9KtxXgqu6O+z090NLSL a5IRQ7AIDrfLyEAsC4+2qHC+mU8Uq9tKmtkZTIb7a6CZNc9sQUJEzyBi41HL1dJOFX/X3vvMQQd6h 6q1PAKiOOcpnOiPt/Ln6zdd3qTZ5tUL1hd9uO2V5o3ckIV1Gp9nlA73Ik4bRFYfXzgsY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLns1-0003A1-1G; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:11:31 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Damien Cassou Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> <20200920172517.GA10641@ACM> <87a6w5qflk.fsf@cassou.me> X-Now-Playing: Burial's _Antidawn_: "Strange Neighbourhood " Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:11:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a6w5qflk.fsf@cassou.me> (Damien Cassou's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:19:51 +0100") Message-ID: <87o831po80.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Damien Cassou writes: >> csharp-mode has an inappropriate use of syntax-propertize-function, >> which might be damaging things. > > I don't know if your comment is still relevant because csharp-mode > changed a lot recentl [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Damien Cassou writes: >> csharp-mode has an inappropriate use of syntax-propertize-function, >> which might be damaging things. > > I don't know if your comment is still relevant because csharp-mode > changed a lot recently. I'm on latest master (commit > fb1f7d57675df8c38bbf9cc3c99e0059c8b16d7f). > >> Could you please disable this with code >> like the following in your .emacs (Note: this involves a minor loss of >> functionality): > > do you still recommend it? (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) This was a year ago, and this was the final post in this thread. Damien, are you still seeing this problem on the current trunk? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 20 10:11:48 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2022 15:11:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLnsK-0000oQ-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:11:48 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLnsI-0000o7-9A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:11:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3Ks+P9zTf8SLvjoslI22Hqy9F2ZdaOK65gumwu8uv8Q=; b=Pv+hBGEAbPFUfEV5MjJjheh5fe HSKtDkcKDtUYzbUuNVT0EbeaCOMSuNRGO2XMG+INwfTx9E+XJ9zziLz7kCG2gS18KYW/gRqRyPFEj YS8cxt7aubmtBp5ChWA0XGAMB612cVoMlHWrbyILc5yEkCscDbOiHI/VXzlW3fIvPVu8=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLns8-0003AA-Ti for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:11:39 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:11:33 +0100 Message-Id: <87mtilpo7u.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #40317 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 40317 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 40317 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 21 05:09:15 2022 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2022 10:09:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nM5d5-00074T-7e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:09:15 -0500 Received: from mail.choca.pics ([80.67.172.235]:47120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nM5d1-00074H-R8 for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:09:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4200D18193F79; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id TZZhubY5haU9; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E6318193F7B; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at choca.pics Received: from mail.choca.pics ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.choca.pics [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id V0nn7W6fmT-M; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (39.99.92.92.rev.sfr.net [92.92.99.39]) by mail.choca.pics (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5112018193F79; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:09 +0100 (CET) From: Damien Cassou To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error In-Reply-To: <87o831po80.fsf@gnus.org> References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> <20200920172517.GA10641@ACM> <87a6w5qflk.fsf@cassou.me> <87o831po80.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0doila3.fsf@cassou.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Lars, > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved > at the time.) I'm following your blog and love your work. Thank you very much! > This was a year ago, and this was the final post in this thread. > Damien, are you still seeing this problem on the current trunk? I haven't been annoyed by this problem (since my switch to Emacs 28?). I suggest closing this issue. -- Damien Cassou "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 21 09:09:10 2022 Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2022 14:09:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9NG-0003AW-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:09:10 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9NF-0003AE-4g for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:09:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9bl7PoNVSKJcfUULR17Hu7DG0BX02A5e+wUFptJB8zk=; b=IwLrTyS2E30VarEaOkasEJ+HDb KdHKjeOZRNyuTWo33ZxC6wpsNfe+joc7KzulwuTWTt4dCdU4ptbKzjs2Y+aI7n31SowA0GlAic0mT 83FkvpHauUVHzLSx7Ps1umerLzYcDdXjdO4HKPR4X9lhMd7ZQV6cV+soPvHd1zDPLF6M=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9N5-00080x-Nc; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:09:02 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Damien Cassou Subject: Re: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> <20200920172517.GA10641@ACM> <87a6w5qflk.fsf@cassou.me> <87o831po80.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0doila3.fsf@cassou.me> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAJ1BMVEUTCg0uEBJxT0Fh EBW8XyTfsyGZERXu3xb69w3VERLqFBOZgoL///9f64ZzAAAAAWJLR0QMgbNRYwAAAAd0SU1FB+YC FQ4BBAUmfqAAAAGpSURBVDjLzdKxbtswEAZgCgIyW2YgIGOUF7ByDYGMQdIanV3HWVPBF9CzA/sB YohrkJYAtXcwHyBLXy53jBzUpLP3Bgm4T6f/KEiIYldVVZ3STXxUFtpCDIpiIP67yj5ZKr+Znh2U +cpsJgckn62N2dQpHM+MMavrdGROA6adjJKVxobhNnlXPjY0slomcHQX4BES4AhjHpsYTri9bmfJ Wic8sTZtAl+4/wm0dPb2KoaLkG02TXzCY5qYrs0TxBN0juXNg/mWnCP/bZY/xku8T76V/koJFqOI QsGl/zP9jrgfkcHCW+e3Du9jUM6idogQvQoAfv19RWxUBBLg57BCjDNEpqAeDDVqO+L/q9+I7/L8 NKu0c7xuRg+FfvgBh7UE55xtBpzI0kMhaTMqxJpXqQOQZJCrznsmWytUUDCQl8+Z9qFIgPYGAqka qZ/zLvS3ztNZSQiggYV7kb6HjgWAU0F791L6XjjKMnCfQHa9OM5BJAjr2H/Bby2HL3wY7nYh4ULh ZReg3MG2Bxn2J/C7Cg82Qu0DLRUABVx2e+Dej0+gXfhCpdsrfAOjWf5cuSsHHgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0 ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wMi0yMVQxNDowMTowNCswMDowMGoXbBgAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5 ADIwMjItMDItMjFUMTQ6MDE6MDQrMDA6MDAbStSkAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Anohni's _It's all over now baby blue_: "Be My Husband" Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:08:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k0doila3.fsf@cassou.me> (Damien Cassou's message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:09:08 +0100") Message-ID: <871qzwl3b8.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Damien Cassou writes: > I haven't been annoyed by this problem (since my switch to Emacs 28?). I > suggest closing this issue. Thanks; closing the issue, then. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40317 Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , 40317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Damien Cassou writes: > I haven't been annoyed by this problem (since my switch to Emacs 28?). I > suggest closing this issue. Thanks; closing the issue, then. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 21 09:09:22 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2022 14:09:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9NS-0003Az-On for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:09:22 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38970) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9NR-0003Al-B3 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:09:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6V6cJAiDU0iHRVJZrz7Q0W6E2ZUCGfNWxA5w6t8QqNg=; b=tAamw9q00iU1ZWR03YqzdWkcrn fPKL1qXcceDoz/61Uw9Bo3EYAG2bmoSL5FpPJ6AeyKtlBvBjX4PSu4/7q5pFWFR6RiCw0RrIIrFrW QV2rqWrY64gA2zl17fDfIGLGzHfc+ThLNZJIYXzRWIU4trKxZMjLnjk3wfc5xJoj4PUU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9NI-00082C-HF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:09:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:09:12 +0100 Message-Id: <87zgmkjoqf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #40317 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 40317 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 40317 quit From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:20:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator