GNU bug report logs - #40236
[PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:36:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier <at> web.de>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 40236 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:24:25 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:39:18AM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> > So compression saves me 26% ([69-51]/69), and deduplication saves me
> > 62% ([180-69]/180).
> 
> Thanks for sharing!
> zstd might give better results.  Any reason you chose lzo over zstd?
> 

My machine is about 10 years old so I was more concerned than normal
about the CPU usage. If lz4 was an option I would've gone with that, but
according to the Arch wiki or some other locations lzo was basically the
fastest option.

Since mail is mostly text I occasionally recompress that. I haven't
figured out how to use 'btrfs filesystem defragment' to choose the
compression level for zstd.

(ins)efraim <at> E5400 ~$ sudo compsize Maildir/
Password:
Processed 121378 files, 129245 regular extents (129245 refs), 19963 inline.
Type       Perc     Disk Usage   Uncompressed Referenced
TOTAL       66%      3.3G         4.9G         4.9G
none       100%      282M         282M         282M
zlib        55%      137K         248K         248K
lzo         53%      125M         233M         233M
zstd        64%      2.9G         4.4G         4.4G


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 71 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.