GNU bug report logs - #4010
23.1; a typo maybe.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: waterloo <waterloo2005 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 03:55:05 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Subject: bug#4010: marked as done (23.1; a typo maybe.)
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:20:07 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:12:03 -0400
with message-id <87vdl56cak.fsf <at> cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: 23.1; a typo maybe.
has caused the Emacs bug report #4010,
regarding 23.1; a typo maybe.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
immediately.)


-- 
4010: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4010
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: waterloo <waterloo2005 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.1; a typo maybe.
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:46:44 +0800
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
In 2.1 Printed Representation and Read Syntax of Emacs List Reference
, at second line there may be `print' not `prin1'.
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: waterloo <waterloo2005 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 4010-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.1; a typo maybe.
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:12:03 -0400
> In 2.1 Printed Representation and Read Syntax of Emacs List Reference
> , at second line there may be `print' not `prin1'.

No, it's `prin1'.

This bug report was last modified 15 years and 295 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.