GNU bug report logs - #40074
trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40074: closed (trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 10:05:05 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 10:55:51 +0100
with message-id <86leosbbvc.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#40074: trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40074,
regarding trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
40074: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40074
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:48:12 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

The source URI for 'trilios-serial-xyce' serves a 404 page.  Following
download links from the home page only leads to the git repository.

This package should probably be changed to download a tagged git
revision instad of attempting to fetch a defunct tarball.

ci.guix.gnu.org has a copy of the previous source tarball so it's not
very urgent (anyone coming here can add "--fallback" to their guix
invokation to get it).

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 40074-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40074: trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 10:55:51 +0100

Hi,

On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 17:37, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> This case should be covered by Disarchive and SWH.  Well, is it worth to
> keep open this issue when the question about the time-machine coverage
> is bigger than just this example.

After 2 weeks without an answer, I am closing since this specific case
is already covered by the ongoing work around Disarchive and SWH.

Feel free to reopen if I miss something.

Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.