GNU bug report logs - #40073
Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 12:26:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Subject: bug#40073: closed (Re: bug#40073: Checksum mismatch on
 python-llvmlite patch)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:36:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#40073: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 40073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
40073: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40073
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 40073-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40073: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 23:35:51 -0500
Hello,

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that
> has the wrong checksum.
>
> Starting download of /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch
> From https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
> downloading from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
>  D47188-svml-VF.patch  73KiB                             1.5MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch:
>   expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr
>   actual hash:   0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli
> hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch'
> build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.drv failed
>
> This is likely a regression from
> 6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you
> already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum.
>
> I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply
> on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8.
>
> There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the
> patches.
>
> Not sure what to do from here, help wanted!

I fixed this in commit 8a34f292923cc4b6487e39570a9c6e0526b094e1, earlier
this month.

Closing,

Thanks for the report!

Maxim

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:43 +0100
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that
has the wrong checksum.

Starting download of /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch
From https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
downloading from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
 D47188-svml-VF.patch  73KiB                             1.5MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch:
  expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr
  actual hash:   0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch'
build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.drv failed

This is likely a regression from
6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you
already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum.

I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply
on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8.

There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the
patches.

Not sure what to do from here, help wanted!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 171 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.