GNU bug report logs - #40009
[core-updates PATCH]: Use per-architecture GCC for libstdc++-boot0

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: bug#40009: closed (Re: [bug#40009] [core-updates PATCH]: Use
 per-architecture GCC for libstdc++-boot0)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 06:53:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#40009: [core-updates PATCH]: Use per-architecture GCC for libstdc++-boot0

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 40009 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
40009: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40009
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 40009-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#40009] [core-updates PATCH]: Use per-architecture GCC for
 libstdc++-boot0
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:51:32 +0200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:21:08PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:
> 
> > I've tested this on aarch64 and there were no problems. It also
> > provides a nice framework for other architectures as they become
> > supported.
> 
> What is the benefit of this patch?  I'd prefer to keep libstdc++-boot0
> identical across architectures for simplicity, unless there is a good
> reason to do otherwise (say, porting to a new architecture).
> 
> Now we could end up in a situation where someone patches GCC5 on
> 'master' and accidentally triggers a full rebuild on AArch64.

Sound reasoning. And currently most of the porting work makes use of
GCC7 and not GCC5. I'm closing this bug.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [core-updates PATCH]: Use per-architecture GCC for libstdc++-boot0
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:12:27 +0200

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

I've tested this on aarch64 and there were no problems. It also
provides a nice framework for other architectures as they become
supported.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[0001-gnu-libstdc-boot0-Use-per-architecture-gcc-versions.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.