From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 08 18:19:14 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2020 22:19:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49442 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jB4GQ-0007NN-5o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 18:19:14 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36063) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jB4GN-0007NA-OT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 18:19:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33903) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jB4GM-0007AC-Nw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 18:19:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jB4GM-0003sC-Jk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 18:19:10 -0400 Received: from 2001-1c02-0b03-a700-7589-14ca-42a9-492c.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl ([2001:1c02:b03:a700:7589:14ca:42a9:492c]:41974) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jB4GL-00017X-ET for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 18:19:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1. From: Roel Janssen To: guix-patches@gnu.org Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 23:19:06 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-aWKxrqON9pnOEl0EDDQ7" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-aWKxrqON9pnOEl0EDDQ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Guix, I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging something that requires a newer version. The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too many rebuilds. How do I check this? Kind regards, Roel Janssen --=-aWKxrqON9pnOEl0EDDQ7 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-Update-python-statsmodels-to-0.11.1.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-gnu-Update-python-statsmodels-to-0.11.1.patch"; charset="UTF-8" RnJvbSBkMDkzZmMyYmFhYzExMDI2ODViNGQxNGJkOGJmZWQyZDIwZGEyNTQ1IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBSb2VsIEphbnNzZW4gPHJvZWxAZ251Lm9yZz4KRGF0ZTogU3Vu LCA4IE1hciAyMDIwIDIzOjE2OjM0ICswMTAwClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQQVRDSF0gZ251OiBVcGRhdGUg cHl0aG9uLXN0YXRzbW9kZWxzIHRvIDAuMTEuMS4KCiogZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3N0YXRpc3RpY3Mu c2NtIChweXRob24tc3RhdHNtb2RlbHMpOiBVcGRhdGUgdG8gMC4xMS4xLgotLS0KIGdudS9wYWNr YWdlcy9zdGF0aXN0aWNzLnNjbSB8IDQgKystLQogMSBmaWxlIGNoYW5nZWQsIDIgaW5zZXJ0aW9u cygrKSwgMiBkZWxldGlvbnMoLSkKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9nbnUvcGFja2FnZXMvc3RhdGlzdGlj cy5zY20gYi9nbnUvcGFja2FnZXMvc3RhdGlzdGljcy5zY20KaW5kZXggMTJkOGEyMDc2Ni4uMTNk NjRiZTQ5OCAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3N0YXRpc3RpY3Muc2NtCisrKyBiL2du dS9wYWNrYWdlcy9zdGF0aXN0aWNzLnNjbQpAQCAtMTg4MCwxNCArMTg4MCwxNCBAQCBidWlsZGlu ZyBkZXNpZ24gbWF0cmljZXMuIikKIChkZWZpbmUtcHVibGljIHB5dGhvbi1zdGF0c21vZGVscwog ICAocGFja2FnZQogICAgIChuYW1lICJweXRob24tc3RhdHNtb2RlbHMiKQotICAgICh2ZXJzaW9u ICIwLjkuMCIpCisgICAgKHZlcnNpb24gIjAuMTEuMSIpCiAgICAgKHNvdXJjZQogICAgICAob3Jp Z2luCiAgICAgICAgKG1ldGhvZCB1cmwtZmV0Y2gpCiAgICAgICAgKHVyaSAocHlwaS11cmkgInN0 YXRzbW9kZWxzIiB2ZXJzaW9uKSkKICAgICAgICAoc2hhMjU2CiAgICAgICAgIChiYXNlMzIKLSAg ICAgICAgICIwZnhzOGE3c3A0ZDdqdnFsbTM2eWk0NWkyZDI4a2pmdnJhZjlxOGk5anIxY2hoeGdq cWI0IikpKSkKKyAgICAgICAgICIxdzZtZjhiODZ2aXppMjg5NWoxMXN6cXJ5cjJ2MWNramlnM3dw OWZ2OTRhc2xmaDN6cGp2IikpKSkKICAgICAoYnVpbGQtc3lzdGVtIHB5dGhvbi1idWlsZC1zeXN0 ZW0pCiAgICAgKGFyZ3VtZW50cwogICAgICBgKDs7IFRoZSB0ZXN0IHN1aXRlIGlzIHZlcnkgbGFy Z2UgYW5kIHJhdGhlciBicml0dGxlLiAgVGVzdHMgb2Z0ZW4gZmFpbAotLSAKMi4yNS4xCgo= --=-aWKxrqON9pnOEl0EDDQ7-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 09 06:46:28 2020 Received: (at 39990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2020 10:46:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBFvY-0003vt-57 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 06:46:28 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:54040) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBFvW-0003vY-CB for 39990@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 06:46:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.13.108]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C291403A7; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:45:49 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1. Message-ID: <20200309104549.GI1423@E5400> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39990 Cc: 39990@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > Dear Guix, >=20 > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging something > that requires a newer version. >=20 > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too many > rebuilds. How do I check this? 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you a list of = leaf packages affected by this package. As a python package, you should also check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-statsmodels python2-statsmodels' > From d093fc2baac1102685b4d14bd8bfed2d20da2545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Roel Janssen > Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 23:16:34 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1. >=20 > * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (python-statsmodels): Update to 0.11.1. > --- > gnu/packages/statistics.scm | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/gnu/packages/statistics.scm b/gnu/packages/statistics.scm > index 12d8a20766..13d64be498 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/statistics.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/statistics.scm > @@ -1880,14 +1880,14 @@ building design matrices.") > (define-public python-statsmodels > (package > (name "python-statsmodels") > - (version "0.9.0") > + (version "0.11.1") > (source > (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (pypi-uri "statsmodels" version)) > (sha256 > (base32 > - "0fxs8a7sp4d7jvqlm36yi45i2d28kjfvraf9q8i9jr1chhxgjqb4")))) > + "1w6mf8b86vizi2895j11szqryr2v1ckjig3wp9fv94aslfh3zpjv")))) > (build-system python-build-system) > (arguments > `(;; The test suite is very large and rather brittle. Tests often = fail > --=20 > 2.25.1 >=20 --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl5mHl0ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EElA//VczDiT0xhfUxj5vDyhlTnK5vZ2BX+HDc+lABRPChnwFh2mj+q1JKFpu8 YZaneqhlxebUhDbsTvel+o9DBC+ipgC8pJ3hjWBXCeeJ240XFNFoWVMndW/N98cL SEMH99tu+mOBMkScOFMLO61VYiiRGzp0x35wi/iuALO+1KrvmecKmxz/5dvjkckQ iH2wJcMFSnF9+yOyUqQA/jhf7D6m8cH6vJs6nCSgSSdZLwWVZipsEYzstcSTPF9b f0Nv0Dy6Ro2cRm/qbq7n/MR6NSenaFkuSdBX10VD6t0Pf+jsju3luBLx+p4snXf0 DG+kIRyu49ro/5EjRrCV63qmAjgoDAvqE5vBAe5F+nkCL4va5yuUwGNXBHmvgDGE Scyf6jaDmGEN3DO2Zl6FQm9K3IuzM6pOtS8Fd+2FVQrqpG2VyLmRSEC2FjeVkdFI /mJElS4+rH7s4mtfWFiYDdjOkWwj81/LJ4YdrQirhn2Emu8F2dG52d7swxUOul2a 3zMwTjuYdpmKpyn2wEnZ/fxLFZZJyIANB6veNbfoSUpksZ7B/WZrB/KK/YQVTmms EB+7cDnEd8EaHw11JJnQv7AKwlX1Vv/O8sydJR/MUjIQ7BNXoBg88ZMxzfzW2ghd vsHJiEV32/lAw7YF2GWU6J2sKpI1K6sPadI9qWKAfxxdwigHoH4= =AI9S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HkMjoL2LAeBLhbFV-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 09 07:20:58 2020 Received: (at 39990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2020 11:20:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49887 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBGSv-0006jj-U9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:20:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBGSu-0006jW-VD for 39990@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:20:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBGSp-0002do-R8; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:20:51 -0400 Received: from ip-80-113-14-101.ip.prioritytelecom.net ([80.113.14.101]:63454 helo=redstone) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jBGSo-0003sh-0t; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:20:50 -0400 Message-ID: <2fa8263b8d6c8744de76acaf06e8bc3f0cf3d2a1.camel@gnu.org> Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1. From: Roel Janssen To: Efraim Flashner Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:20:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200309104549.GI1423@E5400> References: <20200309104549.GI1423@E5400> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39990 Cc: 39990@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 12:45 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > > Dear Guix, > > > > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging > > something > > that requires a newer version. > > > > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too > > many > > rebuilds. How do I check this? > > 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you a > list of leaf > packages affected by this package. As a python package, you should > also > check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-statsmodels > python2-statsmodels' > Thanks! Is my conclusion correct that, by updating python-statsmodels (and thus python2-statsmodels), only "ribodiff" will be rebuilt? And therefore, the update can be pushed to master directly? Thanks! Kind regards, Roel Janssen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 09 07:48:28 2020 Received: (at 39990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2020 11:48:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49894 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBGtY-0000v2-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:48:28 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:45938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBGtW-0000uq-Jn for 39990@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:48:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.13.108]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0411403A7; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:47:49 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1. Message-ID: <20200309114749.GM1423@E5400> References: <20200309104549.GI1423@E5400> <2fa8263b8d6c8744de76acaf06e8bc3f0cf3d2a1.camel@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fa8263b8d6c8744de76acaf06e8bc3f0cf3d2a1.camel@gnu.org> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39990 Cc: 39990@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:20:47PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 12:45 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > > > Dear Guix, > > >=20 > > > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging > > > something > > > that requires a newer version. > > >=20 > > > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too > > > many > > > rebuilds. How do I check this? > >=20 > > 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you a > > list of leaf > > packages affected by this package. As a python package, you should > > also > > check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-statsmodels > > python2-statsmodels' > >=20 >=20 > Thanks! Is my conclusion correct that, by updating python-statsmodels > (and thus python2-statsmodels), only "ribodiff" will be rebuilt? And > therefore, the update can be pushed to master directly? Yep, straight to master. Although if ribodiff builds before your patch and then doesn't after you're on the hook to fix it :) --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl5mLOUACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GtDQ//WqOdobw3DzA9MLLpeDgv4tzfgBeP+Bc967ZeA2tHe27Gv+TP1FrcU1Qq isTXYkm8AH3ZyV6JP4lacd5C2CIlsFWZVooqceAdSIDMpqLi4F9dk1Z51C9Ow1rR NYmXz4sa+f6QLWmfO5gaGEmcooQfwH4BS3O3VthE1ycrRbNAZbHzqzsv0Ig/gFu8 VwfhSij365yfPDBxOH74IaevL/7xI+JwjBoxH+TtrZA+iWGREe7x7cNwdxdT8Eqs FY6DxazeSOvh2Wq3Rr3E16lAktknhN9ptL8BJRn69Qv4nZm5tNlkorGu+YJQ3DdW bcPycI+z6dao0bekUE7iRd3N7QvGPrxkbWXAYTGh2ufrn/PKhiJdYT92rxHCH2u9 kgZ6Nr7HQnxW7bVSUJmlMIMSp3vaZR+eq24N8ySn4nvZWBUPYedHDOa5iz6GoJna mXB1439o3uth/2zSYyJG3jM5AolJ5OylbhLlMkeAE2TfL3ALHw0QBfQC1CeNiFW5 5c6V+cUec5/A6wHzeaO+93MnIYTQCBn87Hd6uJyW1rG6hIwaqdXVPjGgZ7x1dI+c y5YnGYyCA3duvlbKVNcKHaQ0ohmViet7sJBZUEe3gSW79yMG1Rs0ATlLPOVCOkCH lIv59wkjMQs4QpGUGDijYz4K7YTsEqy8YT7LMRc37TOgQhSXui4= =Hcz4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 09 08:05:10 2020 Received: (at 39990-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2020 12:05:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBH9i-0001JD-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:05:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBH9g-0001It-Ne for 39990-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:05:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBH9b-0006OG-EG; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:05:03 -0400 Received: from ip-80-113-14-101.ip.prioritytelecom.net ([80.113.14.101]:55859 helo=redstone) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jBH9a-0006a6-9p; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:05:02 -0400 Message-ID: <652eb7e6c92ce135560f96d5681a16d64336b131.camel@gnu.org> Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1. From: Roel Janssen To: Efraim Flashner Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:04:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200309114749.GM1423@E5400> References: <20200309104549.GI1423@E5400> <2fa8263b8d6c8744de76acaf06e8bc3f0cf3d2a1.camel@gnu.org> <20200309114749.GM1423@E5400> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39990-done Cc: 39990-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 13:47 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:20:47PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 12:45 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > > > > Dear Guix, > > > > > > > > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging > > > > something > > > > that requires a newer version. > > > > > > > > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger > > > > too > > > > many > > > > rebuilds. How do I check this? > > > > > > 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you > > > a > > > list of leaf > > > packages affected by this package. As a python package, you > > > should > > > also > > > check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python- > > > statsmodels > > > python2-statsmodels' > > > > > > > Thanks! Is my conclusion correct that, by updating python- > > statsmodels > > (and thus python2-statsmodels), only "ribodiff" will be > > rebuilt? And > > therefore, the update can be pushed to master directly? > > Yep, straight to master. Although if ribodiff builds before your > patch > and then doesn't after you're on the hook to fix it :) Hehe. Well, it ribodiff seems to fail even with the older python- statsmodels. I am looking into it right away. Thanks for your help! I pushed the update in b6574660e3. Kind regards, Roel Janssen From unknown Fri Jun 20 18:16:25 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator